all 96 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 162 points 10 months ago (7 children)

The computers get faster and the software gets slower. Tale as old as time.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 83 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 39 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    Markdown formatted that as a bullet point. You can avoid that by putting a backslash in front of the asterisk.

    Typing this:

    \* Test Message

    Will get this:

    * Test Message

    Without backslash:

    • Test Message
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 259 points 10 months ago (21 children)

    Not sure why it would be unexpected? 8.1 was not a good OS from a UI perspective, but it was the last version before Microsoft went all in on making Windows a service and not a product you paid to use.

    They still had the incentive to make the OS better and faster. I remember videos from Microsoft at the time showing how fast Windows 8 could get to the desktop compared to 7. They don't really even try to work on stuff like that anymore.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 131 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (7 children)

    Windows 8 also had to run on atom CPUs with dire CPU performance and even more dire memory configs. So even once it was booted it needed to be relatively slim and quick. I actually preferred it at the time because it was faster than 7.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    I miss the Intel Atom, not because I wanted to use it, but because of the positive impact it had on big tech and software bloat. I wish we could bring it back, but it seems nowadays, even Chromebooks have 16 GB of RAM and an i5.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Current RAM shortage will bring good old days back :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    I actually really liked 8.1, preferred it to 7 once I got used to the Start Screen. Surprisingly well designed, actually found myself preferring the menu over 7's

    10 had the best start menu in my opinion, but the quality was just an ever advancing downward spiral.

    Now, I can't even stand it, deal with it at work as much as I have to, but at home, the only Windows machine left is only still on it because simulator peripherals are a pain to get working right on Linux sometimes, so my dedicated simulator machine still uses that, but it's used for nothing else

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 79 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Windows 8 was where Microsoft went all-in on optimizing Windows to run on low-power tablets to compete with the iPad. It's mostly remembered for the terrible tablet-first full-screen "start menu", but also continued the work to trim away all the Vista bloat that had started with Windows 7 (where the motivation was to make it work on netbooks so they could finally stop shipping XP)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    all the Vista bloat that had started with Windows 7

    The fuck?? Vista predates Win7, that sentence makes no sense

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Windows 7 was based on Vista, and started the job of trimming away Vista's bloat, which 8 continued.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

    I basically jumped from XP to 8.1 and I was amazed at how much of an improvement 8.1 was on a technical level. Yes, the UI was horrendous, and any usability expert should have been able to tell you it was a terrible idea, but apparently they weren't listened to. Luckily there was Classic Shell that restored a proper Start Menu, so I never had to use the horrible touch interface.

    8.1 was the last good Windows (with caveats). When support ended I went back to Linux, because 10 and 11 are enshittified to all hell.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I agree, 8.1 with Classic Shell was good. I also liked Windows Media Center.

    I hung on through 10, but last year, as I learned more about Win 11, I decided to finally bite the bullet and figure how to switch to Linux.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Windows Media center was an amazing money saver! I cancelled all my cable boxes, bought a server to run 8.1, bought some used xbox360's for every TV in the house, and everything was paid for in 9 months compared to the cable company rental fees. So I not only got 3 xbox360s and a server for "free" but was saving money for the next 3 years until I cancelled cable completely.

    Plus I had unlimited TV show storage and could transcode anything I wanted to keep permanently to mp4.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah I think Windows 8 in general is just what happens when you don't have proper user testing and go entirely based on what the shareholders think the next big thing in computing is going to be.

    At the time everyone thought that touchscreens and tablets were going to take over everything, at this point though it's become pretty clear that tablets are for media consumption and some creative work. For productivity they just aren't as good as a full on desktop environment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    I never understood how anyone thought touch screens were going to take over for productivity. Back when they were being hyped, it seemed plainly obvious to me that even multitouch didplays couldn't outpace a physical keyboard and mouse for input speed.

    I can't find it with a cursory search, but I remember seeing marketing back then for a laptop that was just two touch screens with no touchpad/keyboard. Color me shocked that it didn't become the new norm...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 42 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Seems like every hardware upgrade just makes software worse because they can just brute force it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 10 months ago (13 children)

    I have fond memories of Windows XP working well.

    Do not have fond memories of the multi-dvd game installations, but I still have my library of physical games. :)

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 10 months ago* (3 children)

    Nothing sucked more than buying a used game only for it to ask for disc 5 to be inserted to continue, when it only came with 4!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago

    Oh, true, but back then game companies would sell you those single disks you needed. My copy of Baldur's Gate 2 was missing one that I was able to replace for a few bucks.

    In hindsight, I kinda miss the awesome customer service that used to exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    Multi dvd? Those are from 2007 and later, iirc. Multiple cds were common by 2000 already, tho

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    And before that, there were games that spanned multiple floppies. Plus, floppies were less reliable, so there was a higher chance one of the disks would fail to read, leading to the Retry, Fail, Abort menu.

    They were only 1.44MB so a 50GB game would take like 40k floppies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    I installed Office 97 from 49 floppies on a bunch of office computers. We didn't have CD-rom drives, so we requested the floppies from Microsoft (this was a free of charge service). Took me a week. Got into graphic novels, as I was waiting for each floppy to load.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I watched a video where a dude wrote his own filesystem for floppies so he could run and play factorio from floppy disk. It was quite entertaining.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    I remember when Doom Ultra HD 8k came on 40k floppies. Back before we even had 2k displays. It took nearly 2 days to read it all into RAM (mind you, I had a cluster of 200 computers just to have enough ram...) and ran at about 0.01 FPS on my 640x480 CRT. And you had to read about 73 more floppies every time you loaded a new map.

    Ah, the good old days.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Windows Vista walked away as the fastest.

    My girl

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    I ran Vista for years, but recall people hating it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    At the end of its life, Vista was quite competent.

    But during the early years, the added animations and transparent features really tanked the performance on the hardware of that time. Combined with the issues any new OS has, it received much hate. Only after much optimization became it somewhat stable.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 73 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Even the older Windows XP managed 50 tabs, and that's because it kept crashing past that number because of its paging file failing to keep up, not because it had hit the 5GB memory ceiling.

    Windows XP 32bit can't hit 5gb memory ceiling, the 32bit memory addresses don't allow that

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Wasn't there a bug that made XP unable to hit even 4GB, I seem to recall a limit of 3,5GB ram....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Fascinating that the browser using so much RAM is the OS's fault, not the browser's. Though, it using more RAM could be considered a good thing if it sped up page loading, but apparently that's not the case with Win11.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Interesting. I've always said that I liked 8.1 the most out of all Windows versions. With classic startup, it was basically a more stable, faster Win7 that had newer DirectX and fastboot. Too bad it died with 8.0 and so 8.1 never got any market share, but damn was it awesome.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    I also liked 8.1, but I kept 7 until 8.1 was released so I never experienced 8.0. Personally I was disappointed with Windows 7 when I moved from Vista because I had heard that it would be faster but for me 7 was slower before I upgraded to a SSD. I used a debloated version of Vista and compared it with the standard 7 so not really a far comparison.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 23 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    7 was about the last time that it felt like Microsoft was trying to make a good product that was useful for its customers. They've always been anticompetitive sniveling greedy little shits that would buy out or otherwise kill competition, but used to be they'd try to sell new versions of Windows or Office on features they could reasonably expect customers to want. "It does spell check in real time now! We've included USB plug-and-play! Your PC with a modem is also a fax machine now! We made a 3D graphics library for gaming enthusiasts! We ship or OS with a media player that can play DVDs and MP3s out of the box! Here's a free video editor!"

    I...don't remember that happening after Windows 7. Windows 8 was an attempt to cash in on the mobile craze, they're gonna make Windows a tablet product now! Except a lot of computers didn't have tablet controls, and a lot of desktop PC software doesn't work with tablet controls. They made a confusing annoying buggy hell mess. Win 10...I remember people hating it when it came out, they REALLY preferred 7, I was on Linux by that time and didn't care that much, and Win 10 was almost a rolling release; it changed a lot over its lifetime. They'd go all in on something, pack Win 10 full of features, and then the fad would fade and they'd pull it back out. 3D, AR, a couple other things. And now we've got the openly user hostile Windows 11. "It Harms Your Family!^(R)^"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    The UI of 7 plus the kernel of 10, and the marketing approach of XP, would make a windows that might come close to being as good as linux today and certainly wouldn't be enabling linux to steal even a few % of market share.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    I always said that 8.1 is the most optimized even compared to 7 (mostly because they launched it together with phone version which shared a lot of stuff with 8 so it includes a lot of optimizations under the hood). Most people never cared to use it apparently.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    They made so many terrible Windows 8.1 tablets which they had to support. I used one of these with an atom z3735f and 2GB of RAM as my only Windows computer for a long time, and Windows 8.1 was completely smooth on it despite the anemic hardware. Some even cheaper tablets and mini PCs released with 1GB RAM and 16GB emmc yet somehow also were also able to run Windows 8.1 okay.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    Was that Windows 8.1, or Windows RT?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    Full Windows 8.1 thanks to Intel's x86 tablet push at the time.

    Windows RT never made it to any other devices besides the Surface RT iirc and was pretty much an immediate failure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    If I could just experience the high of having Windows Phone sounds and experience… I would be so happy. For all the shit it got, Windows Phone is still the most beautiful mobile OS, and the way it utilized sound is still next level.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    Personally I don't think an Os has any business but tying my hardware together and running apps I install myself.

    The amount of services/bloat on Windows now is completely ridiculous and your pc is basically 70 percent their spy device and 30 percent what you bought it for.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

    At first: Stop posting Tomshardware! They just bulk repost ad-enriched low quality clickbait content without validating anything (cough 9700X3D). Just post the original video.

    As the video creator said in it's disclaimer, the test is probably not accurate:

    • I'm having serious doubts about the test setup. The laptops are all on a carpet directly facing a wall. There is a 0% chance that this is using proper air circulation and this will likely effect heat dissipation.
    • Some tests (e.g. Video editing, Battery life) are extremly hardware dependent and shouldn't be used in a OS comparison.
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)

    Okay but can't we just post an article?

    Why does everything need to be a video? I am more sick of Everything needs to be a video then I am of This meeting could've be an email.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    It's the same exact laptop, the tests ran sequentially but were edited so that the video shows them in parallel. Since it's the same hardware in each test and only the OS changes, it's a perfectly fine setup for comparison.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    My father bought my nephews laptops for Xmas and didn’t talk to me about it before purchasing. He got them an i3 for one and a Ryzen 7 for the other with both having 8gb of ram for the memory and I just sighed. Like what sales person convinced you to go with 8gb of ram for Windows 11? So sad for their use.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    [Screaming in linux]

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Saw this video on YouTube a few days ago, it’s really interesting. Seemed like XP, 7 and (somehow 8.1) ran pretty good. Here’s the video for anyone wanting to see it :P https://youtu.be/7VZJO-hOT4c

    Tho while 8 may be more performant, it’s also less usable imo. Would like to see how this stacks up with different OSs!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Windows 8.1 was great. My favourite iteration of Windows ever.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 5 points 10 months ago (12 children)
  • [–] 18 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    the problem is that specifically in Windows 11, it isn't booted up when the login is shown, as integral processes aren't started. Some of these include: the start menu, the search menu, file explorer, and many other background processes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, I'd consider time from boot to login prompt to be a useless metric. You could design an OS to show a prompt before anything else to "win" this pointless race.

    Boot to usable is the only one that makes sense.

    Ok, one case where boot to login is useful: you want to boot up and walk away for a bit, so less waiting for a login means you can login before walking away. Though, personally, I find RAM training takes a long time these days if you're not waking from suspend, so still think boot to login is moot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    This is important to me. More than "time until login" I'd prefer "time until queue". I want to login before walking away because I want to open certain programs. So if an OS allows me to tell it "after you boot up, open these 3 programs" but hasn't completely booted up, I would prefer it to one that only lets you open programs once it has booted.

    And no, configuring so it opens the same programs at startup doesn't count. I wanna choose every time I turn on the computer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 10 months ago

    I believe that once the OS reaches a user login, that still counts as the OS as booted up.

    This is exactly the kind of gullibility for which the login is displayed before the OS is done booting / starting all background processes. Don't be gullible.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    I "early adopted" Win 11 when the Ryzen 5600X came out (late 2020 i think?) and it was objectively better at release. All MS had to do was fix the start button and then not fuck with it and I'm sure there would have been way less hatorade flowing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago* (5 children)

    I "early adopted" Win 11 when the Ryzen 5600X came out (late 2020 i think?) and it was objectively better at release. All MS had to do was insert AI

    • All that Satya Nadella read... probably
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    frfr. bill gates must be rolling over in his grave.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    I'm more impressed that the same hardware ran so many versions of Windows.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago*

    Of course Win11 ran slow, the CPU the tests were done on is 6 generations behind the official cutoff. I'd rather see the results from the same experiment run on a i5-8400, which is min specs.

    It'll still be slow, but at least it won't be an unsupported platform.

  • source