The Senate will vote next week on a bipartisan war powers resolution to block Trump from continuing military against Venezuela — a vote that takes on heightened importance after U.S. forces attacked the South American nation and arrested President Nicolás Maduro early Saturday.

The resolution to block the administration from engaging in further hostilities against Venezuela is privileged, which means Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) cannot stop it from coming to the floor.

The measure is sponsored by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.), Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.).

top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 270 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (12 children)

Next week??

Finish your weekend in the Hamptons why don't you, you fucking slackers.

How about an emergency session in the House? Like RIGHT NOW? Trump just attacked another country: do your fucking job!

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 88 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Well Mikey Johnson didn’t get Trump’s permission for an emergency session, so no.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 93 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Some reporter is gonna ask Mike Johnson on Monday if he saw that the US attacked Venezuela and he's gonna say he doesn't know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    What's the rush? Strongly worded letters take time to write.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    It's the United States of America. You've got to set appropriate expectations. The last time the USA launched a series of illegal wars they did it with broad bipartisan support.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 113 points 10 months ago (12 children)

    Next fucking week? This isn't warranting of an emergency session of congress?

    The US is so fucking fucked. The Dems are gonna find a way to lose the primaries or surrender to Trump's attempts to steal them.

    We've seen nothing from these assholes in the times of greatest crisis.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago

    The Democrats and DOJ have been doing a Sudetenland with Trump for since halfway through his first fucking term, through the Biden admin, and now. Just let him and his movement do and take what they want in hopes that they’ll calm down if they get what they want so everything can get back to business as usual. Just because it’s an ideological Sudetenland doesn’t make any less stupid

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    It's not an emergency, that's why.

    It's business as usual in the USA. We've done this many times. It's like our thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    For example, does anyone remember that time Citibank asked the US to launch an invasion of Haiti, and got it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    A powerhouse for 200 years! Citibank is one of the "controlling interests" that occupy the Fed and banking boards, along with Rothschild, Deutsch, BoA, and so on (I haven't kept up on the most recent list of FED participants and bank boards, corrections encouraged they do change names from time to time).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    It's the Republicans' job to do fascism. It's the Democrats' job to lose elections and offer minimal resistance against the Republicans' agenda. This is what they've been paid to do; the Republicans started with Reagan, the Democrats started with Clinton.

    Since then, it's become not only legal, but incentivized, for them to represent corporate interests over voters' interests.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    So you're saying they're literally the same. /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    Americans, please take this seriously. It's NOT FUCKING NORMAL for your representatives to take this so unseriously, and not doing the thing they've been literally elected to do. I mean being a politician, not against trump, this goes for both sides of the aisle. wtaf?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 63 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    Fucking lazy assholes. Time for a revolt. Put the people back in power, the way the founders intended.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I'm not so sure the founders intended for everyday folk to have power, regardless of the flowery language in the documents we know them for. Lately I'm questioning everything I was taught (or hoped) this country was. The more I look at our situation now and compare it to history, I feel like we're on course with the ideals we've demonstrated since our inception.

    I just feel incredibly disappointed, disgusted... Lots of things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    The three most populated cities in America are also in the most anti-gun states in the union. It's illegal to even possess the kind of firepower that'd be required for something like that. This is by design, of course.

    The only places where you can own that kind of hardware are the harmless rural areas, not near any critical infrastructure, but chock full of electoral votes and underfunded school systems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 59 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Next fucking week. Imagine your house is being robbed but the cops are coming next week.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    We going to just return Maduro like we picked up the wrong bag from the shared work fridge? Oopsie poopsie, sorry I ate all the tangerines before I realized they weren’t mine!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    Any war powers resolution passed by the Senate would need to be approved by the House and signed by Trump to have the force of law.

    The president is expected to veto any resolution to restrict his power as commander in chief and there are not enough votes in either chamber to override such an action.

    While they should be doing anything they can to stop this shit, this whole vote is purely symbolic. Unless they can get support from the house and a supermajority in the senate, no standalone bill will do anything.

    The only real leverage they have is a potential government shut down at the end of the month. Given how unpopular a repeat of Iraq and Afghanistan would be, I want to say that it should be fairly easy to find bipartisan support for a deal that would pull any forces out of Venezuala and potentially put some road blocks in place to dissuade further military interventions. You'd just need some competent leadership and a little bit of backbone.

    [Exasperated Sigh]

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago (9 children)

    So sad that we only need a HANDFUL of decent, non-trash Republicans yet can never seem to find them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    If they were decent, what would make them Republicans?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Voter registration. I’ve got some friends that are “old guard” Republicans - we’d disagree on tax rates and small policy matters like that, but at the end of the day they believe in the Constitution. They’re voting straight Dem tickets now, but haven’t officially changed their affiliation with the election office (I think in the hope that somehow the R’s can return to sanity).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)

    Is it required to register as a voter for a party? Why would anyone do that? Aren't the elections supposed to be anonymous?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    In some states you have to be registered as a member of a party to vote in their primaries. In states with open primaries you can vote in primaries without registering as a party member, but they still typically have party affiliation as an option on the form.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 10 months ago
    [–] 45 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    Trump: dissolves the US senate

    US senate: "we'll vote on it next month"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Someone should explain to Schumer how linear time works...

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago

    If the only choice you ever make is to fold than what meaning can time possibly have for you anyways? Every moment is every other moment, all one synchronous performance of cowardly capitulation to fascism.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago

    Chuck Schumer. Not just a name, but an entire sentence.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    ... And impeach the belligerent invader who usurped senate power in order to commit war crimes ?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago

    Why next week? They should maybe take a break for a while and give themselves a raise for all of the strategic "lack of work" they've been doing. Maybe things will settle down by then. /s

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago

    “My name is Treebeard.”

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    That's not how that works. They need his permission first.

    So they should vote to impeach for murder.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago

    That's an Onion headline forb today if I ever saw one

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago

    Senate Republicans: "Lol I'd say nice symbolic bullshit but my mouth is full of Trump's dick so I'll just click the Nay button."

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago
    [–] 10 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    My guess is they were told it’ll take a week or so to capture all the oil there.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago

    Senate issues decree stating, "No retaliation until next week, and even then, only the absolute bare minimum."

    -FTFY

    The democrats offer only token resistance, as usual.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    Lol, this country is a joke. I've lost all faith in the US.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    a week late.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    Why "hurry"? He won't stop anyway.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    They literally kidnapped the president and proceeded to threaten the replacement. They don't care.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    Little late, no?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    Fucking useless

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Already happened, ineffectual shitbags.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    What's the issue stopping them from meeting today or tomorrow? They can't clear their golfing schedule to do their job and address whether what the president did represents the will of the nation?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    Seems a little late there Schumer

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Bit too late for that.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    The US has been a nation no-one should treat as a serious entity since 2024-11-05, and will not be again until they can prove their ability to hold another legitimate election.

    Right now it’s a coin flip as to whether I’ll see that within the remainder of my lifetime.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    You definitely SHOULD treat the US as a serious entity. When the government is controlled by psychopaths, it doesn't matter what they intend to abide by. It means that they will use the weapons at their disposal when they so choose.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    Absolutely FUCK that. Treating psychopathic bullies as serious entities is appeasement, and provides them vacuous credibility.

    The US has been on the losing side of every armed conflict they’ve been involved in for over 80 years, the clowns they’ve currently placed in charge believe that streak is double.

    Distance should be applied until shit settles down, isolation if that fails, and ridicule until the populous matures enough to elect representation worthy of respect for once.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    I'm not sure what you're definition of a "serious entity" is, but just because the US military has done nothing but fuck up war since Vietnam doesnt make the US non-serious.

    Appeasement has nothing to do with it. All of the world's countries need to take the threat of the US seriously. Isolation and ridicule is what the regime wants anyway. If you infuriate the population against you, suddenly the military grows in numbers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Good luck dickheads.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Maduro and Trump are friends

    Maduro gets to escape his country and save face instead of being assassinated or executed.

    Trump gets to manufacture a conflict so he can start martial law and become a dictator

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Interesting choice of photos.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    Here’s the problem as I see it. Trump, Hegseth, and Rubio are deeply overconfident. Trump’s former ambassador was telling BBC that Venezuela is much easier than Iraq. Trump fell into the same mistake as Bush did of thinking the president is unpopular and that the outside opposition is all set to swoop in and replace the government and give Trump everything he wants in oil. This is too tantalizing. The problem is that the new government is not stable, patriots and nationalists and pro-Maduro pro-army forces will resist and fight a foreign occupation. Trump thought he could skirt the problems of Iraq by doing only airstrikes and wrapping up the whole conflict in less than 60 days (so that Congress can be cut out of the whole thing).

    Rebels can sabotage the oil lines, that means the need for troops to protect the oil. That will go longer than the 60 day limit; so either Trump will have to find another military or ask Congress for authorization. Trump will likely force Congress to go along; Republicans are too scared to cross Trump and Democrats are afraid of being labeled unpatriotic for not going along with it. The fact is that Dem leaders are being silent on this. The only good take I’ve seen is Graham Platner issuing a statement about how illegal this whole thing is, not defending Maduro or sounding unpatriotic.

    Long story short, Congress will meekly go along with Trump’s war as a fait accompli. Nobody wants to be painted as anti-troops or pro-drugs or whatever Republicans will smear them as.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    41 comments in c/nottheonion@lemmy.world view that post
    26 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post