Seeing as the quoted post is from Matt Walsh, I'm a little concerned about what would end up in his definition of an 8th grade civics exam.
post
This sounds like a goods idea until people start voting for certain people to get less education. Oh wait…
Civics wasn’t a class we took until high school where I was from.
So.
No exam.… too easy.
I hate people who use this rhetoric (the op) because literally every citizen over the age of 5, sometimes younger, is a tax payer. Any child that has gone to the corner store to buy candy is a tax payer.
What they really mean is a white, land owning male.
If you could pass an 8th grade civics class, you would know that testing for voting is peak jim-crow era BS.
Go back and try again.
Difference here would be the test is applied to everyone, not only a racial monitory. Still, the idea makes me squirm.
There can absolutely be a difference between a facts based civics test and the intentionally vague bullshit of the Jim Crow era.
Just because a process was used as a cover for systemic discrimination in the past doesn't mean the process is invalid.
We require it for gaining citizenship after all. I've taken the test myself and it's pretty basic 8th grade level stuff about how the government is supposed to function.
I don't think it's inherently wrong to insure that the people participating in the process actually know how the process works.
Disagree, any barriers to participation can (and historiclly will) be abused by those in power. I understand the desire for a minimum level of expectation of society, but unless those expectations are set in stone, they will be moved to disadvantage someone. It would be nice for people to behave and be informed, the world does not work that way...
"Camel, lion, donkey, camera, man, woman, cheese. See I can remember five things. Easy. Aced it. Sleepy Joe wouldn't admit to what I've just admitted to. Tremendous."
If you want socialist democracy, sure.
Honest question, why does wanting a politician to know the absolute bare minimum of civics, hence being a regular society member, is akin to a socialist democracy?
Follow up, if a civics test would be mandatory for a politician job, it should also be free to every taxpayer, period.
Anyone who supports something like this and doesn't make more than $200k a year shouldn't have passed their 8th grade civics exam.
College educated voters lean Democrat and people with no college experience lean Republican. So not the winning idea Matt Walsh thinks it is. Especially considering how dumb MAGA voters are
I would be curious if it's the educational component or the money component that influences people to be right or left leaning.
Yes more people who have second education degrees lean blue, but how many of them are arts degrees and whatnot where they never got to work in their field and are wage slave baristas at Starbucks or whatever.
Meanwhile a lot of people who never went to college went to trade school and are making bank, but most lean towards Republicans.
There was one article I read where people tend to move from Democrat to Republican as they get older, since they eventually amass wealth and net worth and then all of a sudden have more to lose by taxes going up or other policies benefitting those with less then they have and they won't benefit directly anymore.
I'm sure higher education has a role to play, especially down south where even grade school public education is abysmal and most lean to the right.
But money plays a big role too I imagine.
A really underrated part of the right always saying this is that your average uninformed viewer leaves the interaction thinking “educated people prefer the right” when nothing could be further from the truth. If this rule was actually fairly implemented and you actually had to pass an 8th grade civics exam idk if republicans would get a single vote.
Aren't all US High School students required to pass a civics exam before graduation? I was.
8th grade has civics exams?
all 34 comments