Project 2025. So that women will have to stay home.
Ain't gonna go like they think it will.
Project 2025. So that women will have to stay home.
Ain't gonna go like they think it will.
This will definitely encourage more people to have kids.
The US is just speed running Japan in the 90s so they can have a couple of lost decades and lose all significance in the world.
Ooh! Can we get the deflation too??
This is more than lost decades. America isn't rec9vering from this.
The president has a documented history of liking it when kids get fucked.
This country so desperately wants loads of children, but makes it so challenging to support the kids
Daycare is woke. Just another obvious win for the average American and MAGA voter.
/s
It’s like taking candy from a baby. In that it is taking food from babies.
The GOP motto is, "fuck them kids"
So, the dog whistle here is: "Because of the BROWN people from SHITHOLE countries who are here ILLEGALLY anyway, no one can have nice things!"
Trump will literally starve children, to distract the American people, from the fact that he raped children. And that, is fucking wild
Because that's what a total asshole would do.
Anyway....all sorts of meat products have vegan food smeared all over them... Like ketchup! In your face everyone! You guys thought you were being funny. In reality we vegans have been trolling your ass the entire time! So don't worry, you're not as big an asshole as the guy taking childcare services away.
Not sure I understand the background here, but I was reading a thread on r/vegan and there was a buffet of food, with a portion of it marked "vegan". It was mostly untouched, because there are lots of idiots that think "vegan? gross!"
The label was removed - not clear if that was intentional or accidental - and it got cleared out. Because it was just completely innocuous stuff, actually, but people have been programmed to think vegan is some kind of foreign concept. Labeling something that has not been tainted with animal products as "vegan", even if it's, say, a bunch of apple slices, causes people to steer clear.
Rich people doing the math and trying to decide if literal slavery will be cheaper than Bread and Circuses
I was wondering why tiktok algorithm starting spewing tons of self proclaimed journalists confronting Somali daycare centers proving some kind of fraud. Felt very propagandish
You can work a forty hour work week, live responsibly, pay all your bills and taxes on time, etc, and still be below the poverty line in America. You can have kids while financially stable and get hurt or sick. You could have kids and your spouse could die.
This is a foolish, uneducated comment.
You paid absolutely ZERO attention to the comment Ach made.
Your situation today is NOT guaranteed to be your situation tomorrow. You can afford kids today and get hit by a bus tomorrow, and now you can't. Don't pretend to be so thick you don't understand how circumstances can change beyond one's control.
What about the people who thought about it, budgeted the payments into those plans but now can’t afford the children because of the unforeseeable changes?
I don’t think the person you are responding to has nearly enough brain cells to comprehend such an obvious follow up question.
If people were to say that people shouldnt have kids because of most other unchosen life circumstances (for example, "you shouldnt have kids because you belong to a cultural/ethnic group that we dont like"), that sentiment would be seen as prejudice. If one was to go further and suggest that government policy should reflect this, that policy would be seen as an injustice. But if people say "you shouldnt have kids because you're poor", that's somehow seen as wisdom, and advocating that government policy reflect this by cutting off support systems is somehow seen as an acceptable position to hold. Given that people dont exactly choose to be poor, I find this inconsistent.
In any case, kids are not merely some expensive luxury. They are both something that any society needs a certain number of to sustainably function (since obviously, a society simply cant exist without people, and people dont live forever), and which represent a significant amount of generally unpaid labor to raise. Not everyone needs to have them, and some people just arent good with them or dont want them, but when your society's birthrate is below what is sustainable in the long run, telling some of the people that actually do want to have kids not to, because you expect those people to pay for everything themselves without help from the society that eventually needs those people, is a stupid policy, and not exactly fair. Why should everyone else get to avoid the consequences of an aging and declining society, but expect only those that choose to be parents to pay for that?
top 63 comments