all 69 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 68 points 10 months ago*

That's the least significant reason for beating Sam Altman to death.

  • source
  • [–] 59 points 10 months ago

    Once you’ve been searching on the internet for a fact, you’ll never stop wanting to beat every AI tech bro to death with your bare hands.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago

    whaaat? did he really say this or is this ai?

    ai is so realistic now.

  • source
  • [+] 38 points 10 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 53 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [+] 34 points 10 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    What was the original quote?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 81 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Came to ask the same thing.

    Once you've been to Cambodia, you'll never stop wanting to beat Henry Kissinger to death with your bare hands.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Damn, that's also true.

    Fortunately Kissinger is dead!

    Unfortunately, Altman is still alive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    I have 128g of Corsair ddr5 I am saving to pay for my sons tuition in 15 years.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I bought a new laptop with 16 GB of DDR5 (8 GB soldered and 8 GB socketed) as it was super cheap for an 8840HS, and was planning to buy a 48 GB SODIMM for 120€ but held off on it for multiple reasons, thinking "it can wait and I can make do with less memory for now"

    Yeah that 48 GB stick now costs 500€ which is just 50€ short of the entire laptop...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    This too shall pass - we can hope that now there is both a massive revenue opportunity in the server market as well as an abandoned consumer market ripe for the taking, some enterprising manufacturer is going to look into filling this niche. Probably someone out of China, or maybe even India if they can get their shit together in time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I mean I would still wanna do that even if it reduced costs to like $300 for a fully spec'd dream system.

    Even if it cost me $300 per hit, if stop turn him into a vegetable. That'd be the best money ever spent.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    You are now permanently banned from Reddit

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    wait until the bubble crashes and we have tons of ram in the pipeline with no dedicated buyers

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Hope you can use ECC in your boards, otherwise it'll be worthless

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago
    [–] 5 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    I saw 32GB of DDR4 RAM at best buy the other day for around 400 bucks. Which wasn't adding up for me at all but ok

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago
    [–] 2 points 10 months ago
    [–] 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Sam Altman has nothing to do with the current RAM shortage. Moreover, this is not the first RAM shortage. It also occurred during the earlier crypto-mining boom, and at that time no one was having public meltdowns trying to hunt down the inventor of Bitcoin.

    The reason there is a RAM shortage is straightforward, the manufacturers that control the majority of production have chosen to sell primarily to a single industry because that is where the highest margins currently exist. From a financial standpoint, they have little incentive to sell to anyone else.

    If you are looking for accountability, direct it at the large corporations that are deliberately allocating supply to maximize profit. They are the ones shaping the shortage, not individual tech executives.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Now, who could be in charge of the company most well known for needing absurd amounts of RAM to make their product work?

    Who goes around making hundred billion dollar deals to ensure their business has access to massive datacenters filled with GPUs that need 2000GB of RAM?

    Whose company recently wanted to buy 40% of all RAM on the market, and got a letter of intent from major RAM producers who were willing to supply it, assuming they got paid?

    Oh, right! SAM FUCKING ALTMAN! You're right that RAM producers are currently profit-maximizing openly and nakedly, but to call him blameless would be naive and just wrong. They wouldn't be doing so, at least not to this degree, had ChatGPT and LLMs not become the hottest new scam bubble tech industry through his actions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago

    Sam Altman put in an order for RAM. A company is willing to supply it. That company is souly responsible for how they distribute their product. They could only supply them with a small portion of the order and be fair about it but they choose not too. 🤷

    Yes Altman is not blameless but he's also not responsible.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -7 points 10 months ago* (24 children)

    Normally, I think killing a CEO will cause no good because they're so replaceable, but I could make an exception and celebrate Sam's death.

    At least until I have to look at 500 Tankie posts trying to convince western teens and facebook uncles to worship the killer.

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago (19 children)

    Tankie here. Marxists-Leninist don't condone stochastic violent acts during capitalism against Capitalists, the word we use to refer to such tactics is "adventurism", and it's criticized heavily.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    He's telling the truth for once. MLs don't believe that workers should have agency over their lives or the revolution. They only condone violence against capitalists if leadership ordered them to. They're very much a top down belief system hence the "Tankie" part: ie enforcing political orthodoxy with the threat of violence against the workers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago

    They only condone violence against capitalists if leadership ordered them to

    No. We just believe that adventurism isn't a good tactic in bourgeois dictatorship, and we distinguish it from repression of capitalists by the dictatorship of the proletariat, i.e. by the state democratically representing the workers in power.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago* (16 children)

    Then you don't support Russia, China, or North Korea and you're not a tankie, or you do support those entities and you're lying about their activities, in either scenario that's bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (11 children)

    You're not wrong that they support those countries but you haven't explained how that's pertinent to the topic at hand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (10 children)

    Because China, Russia, and North Korea run psyops that either directly or indirectly harm western nations, such as by endorsing, and in some cases funding and arming, people who oppose or disadvantage the governments and peoples in those nations in any way and by doing anything in their power to decrease credibility and trust of those nation's governments.

    Examples: China used its TikTok military op not only to collect and categorize americans (and other nations) but to directly endorse Donald Trump for president, followed by the largest shift rightward in young voters ever recorded. China wants Anarchy in the west, China wants an opportunity to grow their own borders unchecked and become the dominant global superpower.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (9 children)

    China wants Anarchy in the west

    Anarchy isn't a synonym for Chaos

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    It is a synonym for a weakened governing body, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    Unless China is pushing for community gardens, and mutual aid drives in the West, lets try a different word.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago* (6 children)

    They pushed for Donald Fucking Trump, mate. You should try some different words.

    China wants the USA to have a revolution, and the bloodier the better, and in the end they want a loyalist installed as the new leader(s).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    And Donald Trump is the extreme opposite of an Anarchist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago* (4 children)

    Oh, ok, so it's all communal gardens, then? Huh? Is that right, is that all China is pushing for? By getting Trump reelected China harmed the credibility of the USA federal government and pushed it towards lawlessness, it's called accelerationism and it's the preferred political ideology of selfish assholes with zero empathy which includes a very large number of anarchists.

    Trump also happens to be the most deregulatory president potentially of all time, by attempting to overrule the constitution itself and him and his followers are constantly cooing over abolishing income taxes entirely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Is that right, is that all China is pushing for?

    Are you playing dumb? Being snarky? China is pushing for chaos in the west.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I think I understand, you're not implying that what they want is related to communal gardens, you're simply in denial of how the anarchist movement can be misused by them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I'm saying that alot of people use the word "anarchy" to imply something akin to a riot; total chaos rather then what it is: a political movement opposed to hierarchy. The powers that be, approving of hierarchy and being opposed to anarchy encourage this incorrect use of language.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    What do Russia, China or the DPRK have to do with stochastic acts of violence against capitalists?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

    If you're a Tankie

    You support Russia, China, and The Dictatorship of North Korea.

    That's like the definition of the word.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments