I usually add some useful context in the post-body of the posts I make.

Sometimes, it's rather apparent when someone replies (typically antagonistically) without realizing that I've already addressed their concern in the body of the post that they decided not to read.


Strive to be more than a knee-jerk reaction.

  • me, 20+ years ago.

top 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 54 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If there's text in the body, I'll always read it.

Now a better question is if you asked us if we read the linked article before commenting lol.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 23 points 10 months ago

    Now a better question is if you asked us if we read the linked article before commenting lol.

    Touché.

    (I typically don't, myself. I look for a reply that gives me a tl;dr of it.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 10 months ago

    It depends on how funny of a joke I can make from just the headline.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I read the title and the body but I usually don't click on any links unless they're really good. 

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    I'm always honest! Also I don't always finish reading the title.

  • source
  • I'd say it's 95/5... I usually read the whole post or skim read it at least before replying, but sometimes I'll start typing and realize the post was very different from what I thought it was halfway through my rant, so I just discard it before posting (a couple of times I didn't though).

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Reading the title takes too long! I conduct a post vibes séance and respond based off that, namaste

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago
    [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    I read the comments first to see if it's even worth it. Websites are hostile now, with coercive tracking 'consent' popups, newsletter signup popups, 'related content' interjections every paragraph - and that's with an adblocker

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    If it's too long and I don't wanna read it, I just don't reply.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

    Rule 1. Never read the article.
    Rule 2. React with emotion.
    Rule 3. You’re always right.
    Rule 4. Anyone who disagrees with you, is always wrong.

    At least that’s pretty much how Reddit works. I guess many people imported the rules when they emigrated.

    Oh and almost forgot my personal answer: It depends. I try to read the post or article before commenting, but I’ve deviated from my own standards a few times.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    You forgot rule 5: If you can’t think of anything insightful to say, be sarcastic and dismissive instead.

    So many people here (as on Reddit) seemingly can’t resist the urge to drop an oh-so-clever zinger so they can watch the updoots roll in with zero critical thinking skills required. It’s tragic.

    Usually it’s combined with rule 1, so they’ll be reacting to something in the title without realising the article explained what they’re griping about. Confidently incorrect, always.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    For articles, I dont read the post body/article*, but I will read the comments then comment (which is already rare)

    For all other posts, I do read the post body + the comments.

    *If the article seems interesting, I'll read it. Usually though I dont.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Reading the title tells me if it's something I'm interested in. This is when I click and read the body. If the title isn't of interest, I'll mark it as read and move on.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    If the title is interesting I'll read the text and if I decide to reply there's a good chance I'll sigh and discard my comment and move on.

    Although sometimes I won't notice a post with an image has text underneath.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    I read the title, and if it interests me, go to the comments.

    And if there's something in the comments that hooks me enough to comment, I do. But often, I just check the article just so that I didn't miss something important. I sometimes still do miss something important though.

    But before I make a reply in anger, I check the article and the surrounding context first. I still have my blind spots, however.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    I tend to, unless I know the subject matter already.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    If the title is clickbailty than the problem is the title

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago
    [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    Is there something else to read that I’m missing?

  • source