5 4 10 2 12 9 6 7 8 11 3 1
post
Sure but the clock doesn't tell time any differently—now it's just displaying wrong, instead.
Which language provides the most random alphabetically sorted sequence?
Data
| N | Eng | Dut | Ger | Tur | Chi | Lex |
|----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----|
| 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 1 |
| 2 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 10 |
| 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 11 |
| 4 | 4 | 11 | 11 | 9 | 6 | 12 |
| 5 | 9 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
| 6 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| 7 | 7 | 12 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 4 |
| 8 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 11 | 10 | 5 |
| 9 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 12 | 12 | 6 |
| 10 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 8 | 11 | 7 |
| 11 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| 12 | 2 | 7 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 9 |
Sourced from comments in thread (English from image, Dutch from !Vinny_93@lemmy.world, German from !TJA@sh.itjust.works , Turkish from some rando, Chinese from !idealotus@lemmy.world, Lexicographical from !monogram@feddit.nl)
Plot with Correlation Scores
We will compute the pearson correlation (r-statistic) score by comparing the base number (column 1) with the corresponding language column. We will also compute the Serial correlation, by creating staggered columns that measure how close a number is in a sequence to the one before it.
Staggered Table
cat alphabetic.tab \
| awk '{print $0"\t"prE"\t"prD"\t"prG"\t"prT"\t"prC"\t"prL;prE=$2;prD=$3;prG=$4;prT=$5;prC=$6;prL=$7}' \
| tee alphabetic.tab.stagger
Plot Code
gnuplot -p -e '
set xlabel "Base Sequence";
set ylabel "Alphabetic";
set xtics 1,1,12;
set ytics 1,1,12;
set title "Alphabetic Number Plot with Correlation Score";
set rmargin 25; set key at graph 1.5,0.9;
set size ratio 0.45;
stats "alphabetic.tab.stagger" using 1:2 name "E";
stats "" using 1:3 name "D";
stats "" using 1:4 name "G";
stats "" using 1:5 name "T";
stats "" using 1:6 name "C";
stats "" using 1:7 name "L";
stats "" using 2:8 name "ES";
stats "" using 3:9 name "DS";
stats "" using 4:10 name "GS";
stats "" using 5:11 name "TS";
stats "" using 6:12 name "CS";
stats "" using 7:13 name "LS";
set label 1 sprintf("%10s %6s %6s", "", "Base", "Stagger") at graph 1.07,0.95;
plot "" using 1:2 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s %+.3f %+.3f", "English", E_correlation, ES_correlation),
"" using 1:3 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s %+.3f %+.3f", "Dutch", D_correlation, DS_correlation),
"" using 1:4 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s %+.3f %+.3f", "German", G_correlation, GS_correlation),
"" using 1:5 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s %+.3f %+.3f", "Turkish", T_correlation, TS_correlation),
"" using 1:6 with lines lw 3 title sprintf("%10s %+.3f %+.3f", "Chinese", C_correlation, CS_correlation),
"" using 1:7 with lines lw 1 title sprintf("%10s %+.3f %+.3f", "Lexicon", L_correlation, LS_correlation)
'

It looks like Dutch has the lowest (near 0) correlation to both the base sequence and it's own staggered sequence, with Turkish mirroring it's staggered randomness somewhat.
The least random alphabetic sequences are English and German.
Updated: Added chinese and staggered analysis.
Acht, drie, een, elf, negen, tien, twaalf, twee, vier, vijf, zes, zeven.
8, 3, 1, 11, 9, 10, 12, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7
I don't even know 100% that this is Dutch, but Dutch so often reads and sounds like someone German who doesn't know English trying to speak English and I love the language because of it ❤️
Acht, drei, eins, elf, fünf, neun, sechs, sieben, vier, zehn, zwei, zwölf
8, 3, 1, 11, 5, 9, 6, 7, 4, 10, 2, 12
Ah there it is. The real language, not the one a confused toddler trying to learn German speaks
altı beş bir dokuz dört iki on onbir oniki sekiz üç yedi
6 5 1 9 4 2 10 11 12 8 3 7
Transliterating from Mandarin Chinese and using English dictionary order
Ba Er Jiu Liu Qi San Si Shi ShiEr ShiYi Wu Yi
8 2 9 6 3 4 7 10 12 11 5 1 八 二 九 六 三 四 七 十 十二 十一 五 一
Thanks, I've added it to the analysis: https://lemmy.ml/post/32382201/19537907
I still don't understand how acht=12
Okay, here's the challenge: Make it always tell the correct time 8:30 should point to the 8 with the little hand and the 6 with the big hand. And 8:35 shoudl point to the 7 with the big hand.
Was thinking the same thing. This has to be possible, within reason of course
I could get it done with a couple stepper motors, an Arduino, probably a couple hall effect sensors.
In that case, I am officially challenging you. But if you do end up doing it. My instance is shutting down on Monday, so you won't be able to tag me :(
Make an account elsewhere and comment on this post.
Challenge accepted.
Interestingly it would be right twice a day
I'd think four times: 4:20, 4:35, 7:20, 7:35
Portuguese
cinco, dez, dois, doze, nove, oito, onze, quatro, seis, sete, três, um
5 10 2 12 9 8 11 4 6 7 3 1
cinco, dez, dois, doze, meia, nove, oito, onze, quatro, sete, três, um
5 10 2 12 6 9 8 11 4 7 3 1
(six can be "seis" or "meia")
If a mechanical clock or watch was like that it would be one hell of a fascinating movement
I don't get it
The numbers are sorted by their English spellings.
Is it a meme or a riddle?
"Two" is the last one. The order starts with "eight".
Think about it: on a real analogue clock, where is the smallest number and where is the largest?
I was equally confused initially, but then I looked at the clock in my house and realized that the number up top is the highest number, 12, and not 0. So the first number in the ordering is at the position of the 1 of a normal clock.
You're missing the lack of logic, aka you're not missing shit, OP has some soul searching to do.
Cinq Deux Dix Douze Huit Neuf Onze Quatre Sept Six Trois Un
5 2 10 12 8 9 11 4 7 6 3 1
top 55 comments