The governor of the Central Bank of Sweden comments our payment systems.

Hereโ€™s an AI translation of the text into English:

"Given the geopolitical situation, it is important to create European systems in a number of areas. This is according to Riksbank Governor Erik Thedรฉen in an interview with Ekotโ€™s Saturday program, where he emphasizes that Swedenโ€™s payment systems should not be as dependent on the USA as they have been. As an example, he points out that the two dominant credit card issuers, Mastercard and Visa, are American. 'It is probably wise to consider that we should also have European or Swedish systems that function in case the American ones do not,' he says. According to the central bank governor, Swish is 'a certain complement.' He also highlights that other countries, such as Denmark, have their own national credit cards."

top 48 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] 25 points 10 months ago (4 children)

We need digital euro. There are advances, but it's still going too slow.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 17 points 10 months ago*

    Yup. This is the solution to US control of cashless transactions. The sooner the digital euro can be agreed upon, standardized and rolled out at the EU level, the better.

    As a Romanian in a country still outside the Eurozone, I hope there's provisions to allow us to use it for RON transactions while our economy is still too much of a mess to join.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Doesn't this open up privacy issues?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Yes. They compare it to cash, but the FAQ specifies

    [Payment Service Providers] would be able to identify users for the purpose of compliance with anti-money laundering rules.

    Better systems include blinded signatures and ring signatures.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 3 points 10 months ago

    The amount of times I had my rent/bills bounce because my bank got frozen from anti money laundering AI bullshit that flags every single thing. God forbid you can afford to pay a friend's car insurance

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 10 points 10 months ago
    [โ€“] 28 points 10 months ago (16 children)

    It exists, it is called Wero. Check with your European bank if they support it. Many do.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [+] 24 points 10 months ago* (4 children)
  • [โ€“] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Fair point, however, it is happening. They already outline the payment process and it seems simple enough to implement, at least for payment by smartphone.

    Scan QR code with your banking app, confirm payment, done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] [S] 8 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    The scanning of the QR code is unfortunately a bigger issue than one can imagine. Takes slightly longer and is slightly more complicated than just blipping your credit card. Enough so to dissuade most people to use it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 2 points 10 months ago

    With the credit cards, you still need to get android wallet, Apple pay, authenticate, do the NFC dance...

    Many European countries already have local parallel systems already for pin and chip cards, Visa/MasterCard is already a secondary system if the card is used within the country's border despite the huge logos.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    It hasn't been rolled out to brick and mortar yet. This is planned in Q4 2026. ( And yes: they have planned much lower fees than visa/MasterCard and simpler P.O.S setups where existing hardware could be used).

    The EPI (European Payment Initiative , a grouping of 16 European banks and financial institutions) is deliberately doing a slow launch though the tech behind it is all set up.

    They don't want to F-up with people's money.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 7 points 10 months ago

    Wero is not widely supported yet, it's not even finished yet, it doesn't have feature parity with existing solutions. Compared to its predecessor, Giropay, it's also rather intransparent, in a "just trust our app, bro" kind of way, with little in the way of open standards.

    It needs support from every single bank to work (in stark contrast to PayPal, btw), and that support requires quite a lot of development and maintenance effort on the part of the bank. Parent poster (BarHocker) said many European banks already support it, but the practical reality is most of them don't, and largely didn't have any plans to, either. The number of supporting banks is artificially inflated by the fact that the German Volksbanken/Raiffeisenbanken and the Sparkassen, respectively are technically hundreds of small regional banks.

    This requirement to have direct support from the individual banks is, the way I see it, the main reason why Giropay failed. If Wero has the exact same problem, I don't see why it would succeed where Giropay did not.

    I do still hope for it, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 11 points 10 months ago (7 children)
  • [โ€“] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I see Taler brought up, and it always intrigues me.

    What is the current state of it? With the app it looks like I can add a bank potentially but there are no payment service providers populated.

    Does it currently function in a way I could transfer money between myself and a friend?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [โ€“] [S] 5 points 10 months ago

    I'm afraid you're wrong. We've had something very similar to Wero in Sweden since 2012 - it's called Swish. It helps, but it unfortunately doesn't get rid of the need for visa and mastercard.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 3 points 10 months ago

    Wero has a specific functionality. He is not talking necessarily about consumer-facing systems here. For european banks there are other systems and infrastructure that need to be thought about.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 9 points 10 months ago*

    Funny how when Visa and MasterCard cut off cross-border payments in Russia โ€” by their own initiative, without any laws forcing them to do that โ€” Westerners all cheered. Then three years later it finally hit them as to what that means.

    Meanwhile Russia was building their own payment system since 2014, and it was already working nationwide before '22, so people just got a new card if they wanted, and the system currently dominates the country's market.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 7 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    Source? You only linked an image

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 12 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    We need an open platform for payments, not just another centralized solution.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [โ€“] 4 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    I think the biggest issue with this is that payment systems require a certain level of trust, that's hard to achieve in a decentralized system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Good point. Trusted by who? Let's say a business has an open payment system and you are buying something from them using whatever money provider you use. What do they care if transaction is successful and money has been wired to them? Also we have certificates and what not, business could act like browsers - trust valid certificates and not trust invalid ones or do as they please. Of course the question here is who provides certificate validity - there could be more providers. I didn't really think deeply into it, but we should be free to not be under one or the other master that can and will bully and extort us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    we should be free to not be under one or the other master that can and will bully and extort us.

    I think that ship may have sailed for humankind since centuries back. ๐Ÿ˜

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 4 points 10 months ago* (4 children)

    I thought that there was already an EU payment system in the pipeline, due to roll out completely in 2026? Or did I make that up.... ๐Ÿค”

    EDIT - Wero - https://sbs-software.com/insights/wero-europe-payment-race/

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    There is a reason why Europe is not the leader in software development.

    An European team gave my south American office branch a piece of software that follows crappy programing guidelines.

    The local team from my city is fixing that shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    That's not a European thing, that happens everywhere in the world, I would blame your south American office branch for accepting it without checking or trying it first.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 2 points 10 months ago

    Not European, but here's a structure that I think would be best (for all currencies, European or not).

    Central bank creates a nationalised corporation "National payments processor". Loans out money to NPP to create a copyleft MasterCard competitor.

    NPP's objectives are to reduce interchange fees, establish sovereignty in this space while keeping transactions secure.

    Now, from what I understand, a retailer cannot charge different rates for different payment processors. Meaning, if I am a retailer, I can't charge more to customers who pay using Amex (who have high interchange fees) compared to those who pay using visa/MasterCard (lower fees).

    Meaning, if NPP keeps interchange fees low, the benefit would be passed on to retailers directly. Consumers would see 0 benefit. If consumers see 0 benefit, no one's going to pay using NPP. This is the case with interac in Canada. Interac payments are better for retailers. But I see 0 cashbacks through my interac card. Why should I not use my visa credit card instead that gives me better cashbacks?

    Therefore, here's what NPP does: it charges marginally less interchange fees compared to visa Mastercard, WHILE passing most of the fees charged to the retailer directly to the consumer as direct cashback.

    Consumer adoption happens because of better cashbacks, retailer adoption happens because there are people willing to pay using an NPP card (and also the sliiiightly less interchange fees).

    Now, to the organisational structure of NPP. State owned corps are prone to corruption. Accountability structures are top down. If I, the taxpayer owner of NPP am seeing corruption in NPP, I have to threaten my MP with my vote, who has to threaten the PM with their vote, who then has to threaten the finance minister with their job, who then has to threaten the head of the central bank with their job, who then has to threaten the ceo of NPP with their job.

    Instead, while the state maintains equity over NPP, the operations of NPP are controlled by a state started consumer cooperative, where member owners are those who own an NPP card. This way, accountability structures are much more direct. The inefficiencies of state owned corps are severely reduced while maintaining the benefits.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Just copy Pix and be done with it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 10 months ago

    at least we have Wirecard

  • source
  • [โ€“] 1 point 10 months ago

    I don't understand how this is an issue. In France there exists CB and as far as I understand other EU countries have got their own equivalent national Visa/MasterCard competitor... Why do some countries not have their own ? Why can't they just enter in an agreement to use this ? Why do people always comment about this app or this other app.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 1 point 10 months ago

    Japan started JCB in 1961.

  • source
  • [โ€“] -2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    For years I am watching the cryptocurrency Nano ($XNO). As many cryptocurrencies, it is free / libre / open source, decentralized (belongs to no nation). But it is also totally without fees (I haven't believed it but checked and it is really true), super fast (full confirmation under 1 second) and super energy efficient (on par with usual bank card transaction). And the guys beyond it are there for the original goal of crypto - enabling independent money usage - while also explicitly distancing themselves from speculative "investing".

    But it is not yet "commercial grade", so big companies are for now not encouraged to use it for high throughput use cases. And it is also not yet widely accepted by vendors, and widely owned by paying customers. Basically the chicken and egg problem...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 2 points 10 months ago

    Nano had centralized issuance with CAPTCHAs administered by a private organization. This means they could have given themselves >51% of the total supply at no cost by lying.

    It's unreasonable to expect the people of Europe to trust crypto bros that much.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] -5 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Eliminate the need for central banking altogether, buy and sell in Bitcoin

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 4 points 10 months ago

    BTC is highly inefficient.

    Central banks are good, as they can manipulate interest rates to avoid recessions. This is not possible with BTC.

    The USD was tied to gold during the great depression. This fact was one of the biggest reasons why the depression lasted so long. Had the USD not been tied to gold, the depression would have been much shorter.

    If BTC becomes the primary method of transaction, be prepared for recessions to be as devastating.

  • source
  • parent