Sometimes there’s free breakfast too. And less chance of hidden cameras.
post
Hostels are the best. Just give me a bed to crash and tomorrow morning I'll be off again.
I would love for the Japanese capsule hotels to become a thing here in the US. I've always hated paying $150 or whatever for a full room (or suite) during a road trip late at night when all I do is crash out on the bed and then get up and drive first thing the next morning.
Weirdly, the capsule hotels tend to be more expensive than traditional hostels, and that's for 150 dudes in a room.
I assume part of it is the novelty + influencers will pay anything for a few more clicks.
in japan or in the US?
Capsule offers no benefit over regular bunk beds. I've been in both but I try to avoid capsule now. You don't even save that much space, people still need to get in and out of their space anyways. But getting to your bed from the short end is just a damn hassle
I sleep in my car, often. If I drive until 2 am, and have to be back on the road around 8, I don't see the point in spending a bunch of dough.
If I was home, I'd probably be sleeping in my TV chair anyway.
I wish I could do that but I drive a roadster. Absolutely no fucking way to stretch out comfortably.
Yeah, a full stretch out doesn't really work in my van, either, but I can deal with it for a few hours. I can see where a roadster would be absolutely impossible.
At least your getting good gas mileage. You can use the savings to pay for the room.
By the way, when I do stay in a motel, I always stay in cheap places like Motel 6 and Super 8. They've renovated most of them, and while they aren't fancy, they're clean, the beds are comfortable, the shower works, and they have a TV. They usually have a fridge and microwave, but I seldom use them. You can usually find one under $75, and I recently found one for $37!
At least your getting good gas mileage.
Lol I get about 16-18 mpg. 6-cylinder engines ain't fuel efficient even when they're jammed into a go-kart. For bonus points, the damned thing takes 93 octane.
And I'm bitching because my van only gets about 22.
Keep the dirty side down, and the shiny side up!
Not to mention a lot of them even have private rooms for pretty cheap.
I've stayed at dozens of ~$80 a night motels in my day and never once has it been a negative experience. I check the room over with a UV light regardless, but I've never found anything. The service is always under paid burnouts so if you're cool they're cool. Plus the vibe is always this beautiful liminal emptyness that you can't get anywhere else.
I’ve seen roaches, which was gross, but never any bedbugs thank Christ.
Roaches are easy to avoid picking up. When you travel, take a "kitchen" size garbage bag with you and if you land at a place that's got roaches and it's the only available option for the night, put your travel bag into the garbage bag and hang it off of the shower stall rod.
Bedbugs is a sleep in the car option OTOH.. Yikes!
You can sleep in the tub if there's bed bugs. They can't grip the surface and do not fly or jump. The caveat being if they are so bad they are climbing to the ceiling and literally falling on you.
The caveat being if they are so bad they are climbing to the ceiling and literally falling on you.
New nightmare fuel unlocked.
Tbh I’m a bit surprised how quickly Airb’n’b enshitified. It’s not even a competitor anymore imo.
Too many people who should not own and rent investment properties bought investment properties to rent as ABnBs. It broke the spirit of the thing, which was to rent space in your house, not a property used solely for that purpose.
Why haven't zoning laws caught up?
They do but it’s apparently hard to enforce.
Couldn't you just search Airbnb for your jurisdiction, then catch the landlord red handed?
I would agree.
I say it less as I know why and more that I know a lot of municipalities (including mine) have laws and codes in place that prevent using properties as hotels, and have had them for years, and yet they still operate.
So either they’re hard to enforce or they’re understaffed to do so.
They can pretend they live there. It's harder than you think. And legislation takes time that a new app development does not. It is also local, so you are talking about thousand of civic governments not in concert with each other, and often playing the game with rental properties themselves.
The early days were actually great. People renting out spare rooms for cheap was a win/win, but of course "entrepreneurs" had to turn that into a side business and AirBnB had to maximise profits so it all went to shit.
Criminal money actually have real utility for being criminal money, the only problem is it being used as an investment vehicle.
It's interesting how the newer ones are more valued. Piracy isn't even on there anymore. 🧓
Holy shit, I love this!
Once again, Late Stage Capitalism in the root problem in all enshittification of an otherwise innocent and slightly innovative idea.
They have also destroyed rent in lots of places. Here in Spain prices have more than doubled for rent since AirBnB is a thing. Landlords even tell you that they get way more money from airbnb, so supply and demand and all that.
Tbh ive booked no less than 8 airbnbs in the last 3 years and have always had zero issues in any of them. No ridiculous rules or deposits or anything, and a lot more privacy than getting a hotel. More importantly, always far cheaper than getting a hotel that isn’t questionably shitty
In that same span of time, Ive booked like 4 hotel rooms. One was a four star property that was great but stupid expensive. One was a “3 star” property that was shoddy as fuck, had bedbugs, and refused to give me a refund despite bringing one of the bugs to the front desk and politely declining to be put in another room. The other two hotels were decent but cost more than what they were worth compared to a STR. Hence I roll on with airbnbs
Why anyone would pay more for less space and less privacy I fail to understand
Just an FYI, since privacy seems to be a big concern for you… AirBnB used to allow hosts to hide cameras inside of their rented spaces. It was explicitly allowed in their renting rules, under the premise of allowing owners to enforce rules and collect evidence in case of excessive mess/damage/theft. They banned hidden cameras in 2024, but over half of rental owners still admit to using them, and about half of all guests still report finding one inside of their rented spaces if they bother to look.
AirBnB never allowed hidden cameras; they allowed visible indoor cameras in common areas like a living room or kitchen. This isn't to say that some nefarious hosts might have hidden cameras, which has always been an issue, but to say that they explicitly allowed it in their policy is patently false.
Here's the archived version of the policy page in 2022: Use of cameras and recording devices
I meant privacy moreso as in coming and going as I please without interacting with anybody or being surrounded by other guests. But that is a valid separate concern I suppose
Says something about how awful some people are to interact with when anyone would rather the alternative, doesn't it?
This is blatantly false. Got a source for your claim?
Which part are you suggesting is false?
That it was explicitly allowed in the rental agreement for the purpose of collecting evidence of rulebreaking.
I don't know if you're going to find anything that explicitly states that the security cameras are intended for security, but
https://news.airbnb.com/an-update-on-our-policy-on-security-cameras/
you're looking for this.
From your link:
Historically, Airbnb allowed the use of indoor security cameras in common areas of listings, such as hallways and living rooms, as long as they were disclosed on the listing page before booking, clearly visible and were not located in spaces like sleeping areas and bathrooms.
How do you read that and conclude “they explicitly allowed hidden cameras”?
What sort of hotel are you staying at?
I just looked and the cheapest air BNB in my city is literally someone's RV for $100 a night.
In most cities I can grab a room in a nice hotel for $100 to $150 per night. Cheap hotels are more like $80 a night.
Short term rental, an umbrella term for airbnb, vrbo, etc
I stayed at one AirBnB where the owner had replaced all the kitchen counters with untreated butcher block. The instructions basically said "don't use the kitchen". For bonus points, my parents got the one bedroom and I had to sleep in the kids' room ... on the bottom bunk with the actual kid's sheets because there weren't any other sheets in the house. I just felt sorry for the kid.
My favorite hotel is the "C'mon inn" in Montana, North Dakota, Wyoming, etc. It's a small family-owned chain that charges about $100 per night and has rustic decor and always has a pool and a bunch of jacuzzis. Amazing service, tasty breakfast, low price, and I'm not feeding some gigantic corporation. It's a matter of finding the smaller outfits, I tell ya.
I'd love to try if weren't for the fact that you have Trump harassing foreigners.
And if it does exist, sometimes it's not legal. 🤡
I once had the guy tell me to enter and exit the building discreetly because the other tenants weren't supposed to know he was subleasing the apartment. I think they knew.
I had the same thing happen to me in London. Twice.
Both booked from hotels.com. The place didn't have the advertised room available so we got moved to another location. Both times.
Never book through Hotels.com even for actual hotels. Just look at the price and call the hotel directly. They will always price match because Hotels.com takes a cut of bookings through their site so they always win out if you book directly at the same price instead of going through hotels.com
AirBnB may have some niche uses, but it is no replacement for hotels if you are just looking for general lodging.

top 84 comments