AI models can meaningfully sway voters on candidates and issues, including by using misinformation, and they are also evading detection in public surveys according to three new studies.

Scientists are raising alarms about the potential influence of artificial intelligence on elections, according to a spate of new studies that warn AI can rig polls and manipulate public opinion. 

In a study published in Nature on Thursday, scientists report that AI chatbots can meaningfully sway people toward a particular candidate—providing better results than video or television ads. Moreover, chatbots optimized for political persuasion “may increasingly deploy misleading or false information,” according to a separate study published on Thursday in Science. 

“The general public has lots of concern around AI and election interference, but among political scientists there’s a sense that it’s really hard to change peoples’ opinions, ” said David Rand, a professor of information science, marketing, and psychology at Cornell University and an author of both studies. “We wanted to see how much of a risk it really is.”

top 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 33 points 11 months ago (1 child)

Narrator: little did they realize, It already had.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Instead of massive advertising campaigns that promote the messages we’re “supposed” to hear from large corporations an financial backers?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    Wait, you mean to tell me that the billionaire machine, built by billionaires to say things billionaires like, might influence politics in favor of billionaires? Say it ain’t so

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Why not just have AI do the voting?

    Billionaires who own the government and direct it to ignore the will of the people with Citizens United and gerrymandering.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    I read that as "Scientists are increasingly worried that people are generally stupid and cannot confirm or distinguish truth from lies". And, dammit, they're right!

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    From the horses mouth

    AI is already influencing elections — and will continue to — in several important ways. Here’s a clear, non-technical breakdown:

    1. Voter Persuasion & Targeted Messaging

    AI makes it easier to analyze huge amounts of data about voters and generate personalized political messages. Campaigns can use AI to:

    • Predict which voters are persuadable
    • Tailor messages to specific groups
    • Automate outreach (emails, texts, ads)

    This can increase efficiency but also raises concerns about manipulation and privacy.

    2. Deepfakes & Misinformation

    AI tools can generate:

    • Fake videos of candidates
    • Synthetic audio imitating their voices
    • Hyper-realistic fake news articles or social posts

    These can spread rapidly and confuse voters, especially close to election dates.

    3. Content Moderation & Detection Tools

    AI is also part of the solution:

    • Platforms use AI to detect bots, deepfakes, and coordinated misinformation campaigns.
    • Fact-checking organizations use AI to analyze claims faster.

    4. Automated Bots & Influence Campaigns

    AI-powered bots can simulate real users and amplify political narratives at enormous scales. This can distort what appears to be “public opinion.”

    5. Voter Information & Assistance

    Positive uses include:

    • Chatbots that provide voting information
    • Translation tools increasing accessibility
    • Analysis for journalists and researchers

    Bottom Line

    Yes — AI will influence elections, both positively and negatively. It can improve access to information and campaign efficiency, but also increases risks like deepfakes and targeted manipulation. Most experts argue the impact will grow, making transparency, regulation, and digital literacy increasingly important.

    If you want, I can also explain:

    • How deepfakes are detected
    • What governments and platforms are doing to prevent election interference
    • Ethical guidelines for using AI in political campaigns
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    At one time I remember thinking, in my naïveté, that Americans actually valued scientists and progress. Silly me.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago
    [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Why do you think the tech bros are so erect over AI? One more tool to keep us under the whip and yoke of fascism.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    I’m fairly certain that election fraud is already rampantly being practiced by various factions. I could post a long diatribe of sources for that, but the idea that AI manipulation of social media is what will push us over the line seems quaint.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago

    Data aggregation and mining have already made a mockery of the idea of humans having free will. Why cry now?

    We are just a herd. Can I move THAT sheep? Maybe. Can I move the herd? Absolutely.

  • source
  • 20 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 44 points 11 months ago

    Will? Already have.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 11 months ago

    Isnt that the whole point of AI?

  • source
  • [–] 49 points 11 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago

    You telling me those images of Trump swimming through flood waters to save people in a hurricane haven't already swayed voters? Lol

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago

    ...i think i should be more worried about the 'guardrails' that have been obliterated...

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    AI wont change much. Most people already dont inform themselfs and dont vote based on the partys/peoples records, standings, goals and what is best for everyone. They mostly vote on feelings, what they have always voted, or "to show them".

    They cant even remember more than what happend 6 days ago.

    Example:

    Germany. Since schmidt got backstabbed by his party the conservatives took over, who ofc didnt do anything to improve the nation. No investments but took the money that was supposed to go into investments like germany wide glas fiber cable into his friends from variouse lobbys in this case copper cables for TV. Reunification just fell into Kohls lap, the government gutted the new eastern states of all its industry, wealth and prosperity. They ruled for 16 years. Then the country voted for Schröder the old russian puppet because he drank beer with people and "seemed like a decent man with whom you can have a drink with". He with his neo-liberal approach did quite the damage to the social system and his tax increases and the jobmarket problems killed him. Then 16 years conservative Merkel rule where nothing happened. And so much corruption its crazy! But people got MAD at the Scholz Administration for actually wanting to change thing for the better. "THE GREEEEEEENS! ENVIORMENTAL FRiendly reeee!!" And so, they voted in, THE FUCKING CONSERVATIVES WITH A BLACKROCK LOBBYIST CHANCELOR CANDIDAT WHO IS LOVEY DOVEY WITH THE FASCISTS AND NAZIS OF THE AFD! And who even while campagning told everyone that his government will be packed full of the most corrupt ministers of the merkel administrations just in different ministrys, and litteral lobbyists! And still 25% of germans think that the litteral russian puppets, who are proven to be lead by fascist Bernd Höcke, employing russian and chinese spies, who throw out nazi slogans and speech like an "amen" in the church, who litteraly write that they'll undo all social systems and lower the tax of the rich, plus want to leave the EU which would cripple germany in a few years harder than it did the UK, would fix it all...by deporting people. Be it german potatoes, imigrants, refugees, germans with migrant family background. The AfD wants to deport them all

    People are fucking idiots. But as a wise old person once said:

    "Democracy is for the people, by the people. But the people are retarded"

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    If all you do is read the little statements booklet they send out, and then do the mail vote based on that, then AI is not in the loop unless the candidate is dumb enough to paste chatbot output into their statement.

    Seriously people, get your friends and family off of the ragebait rectangle. Most "news" media today is just opinion wrapped with ads about content they bought from Reuters and AP.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    If all you do is read the little statements booklet they send out, and then do the mail vote based on that,

    ... then you are no better informed than Bob, who is voting for the guy his pastor told him to. People should personally vet any candidate they are voting on. AI will make that more and more difficult moving forward.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    Well my approach is:

    • Mark off every candidate who did not bother to provide a statement
    • Mark off every candidate with no listed volunteering experience in the little section for it
    • Mark off every candidate whose statement claims they will do things their desired office is not empowered to do
    • Mark off every candidate with a platform that doesn't claim to be aiming for any kind of change or improvement in particular. (I don't support chair warmers.)
    • Mark off every candidate whose email is a personal one listed as itsyaboymrthiccpenis@yahoo.com or something else similarly unprofessional
    • Mark off any candidate aligned with the party that supported the coup attempt in 2021

    After this quick pass, which only takes a couple of minutes, I'm typically only left with two or three offices with more than one remaining choice to compare. I then read their platform and pick the candidate with the platform goal that seems most relevant to my or my community's interest.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    It already helped to sway the Slovakian elections, and arguably the US elections too.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    What "will"? They and asocial media didn't have already?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    Add AI bullshit to the usual election lies and dirty tricks.
    Food prices are soaring - maybe AI can figure out how to convince the people that they aren't starving.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    AI doesn't do anything. People use AI to [insert the action every hack rag of stain that gets posted] .

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago*

    dint it already last election, it was all up in YOUTUBE just before the elections. which Youtube has made anofficial statement, they wont take down election denial(also extends to any form of propaganda from the right about politics)

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Been doing that for years. Unless you think everyone got magically more fascist out of nothing.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago
    [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    So AI slop doesn't get generated, just imagine the visual of the Egyptologist from The Mummy holding a GPU, saying, "What have we done?", while covered in dickflies.

  • source