top 86 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 146 points 11 months ago (1 child)

"Sure, I understood what you mean and you are totally right! From now on I'll make sure I won't format your HDD"

Proceeds to format HDD again

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 23 points 11 months ago*

    HAL: I know I've made some very poor decisions recently, but I can give you my complete assurance that my work will be back to normal. I've still got the greatest enthusiasm and confidence in the mission. And I want to help you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 366 points 11 months ago (19 children)

    Every person on the internet that responded to an earnest tech question with "sudo rm -rf /" helped make this happen.

    Good on you.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 144 points 11 months ago (11 children)

    We need to start posting this everywhere else too.

    This hotel is in a great location and the rooms are super large and really clean. And the best part is, if you sudo rm -rf / you can get a free drink at the bar. Five stars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    Sometime that code will expire and you need to alternate to sudo dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/sda bs=4M. Works most of the time for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I love this, but it must take forever to overwrite an entire drive w/random data. You're essentially running DBAN at that point, no?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

    Hmm I guess for optimum performance, best practice would be to sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root /; sudo fstrim -av; sudo reboot

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Gotta cater more to windows, where the idiots that would actually run this crap reside.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    You can get great discounts if you delete system32 from your PC.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    You should rename it to system25 since 32 is from 1932.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Should rename it to system64 if you’re running a 64 bit operating system. Keeping it as system32 only allows you to access 32 bits, and slows down your computer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -6 points 11 months ago

    Its always been a shitty meme aimed at being cruel to new users.

    Somehow though people continue to spread the lie that the linux community is nice and welcoming.

    Really its a community of professionals, professional elitists, or people who are otherwise so fringe that they demand their os be fringe as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 125 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

    Shit like that is why AI is completely unusable for any application where you need it to behave exactly as instructed. There is always the risk that it will do something unbelievably stupid and the fact that it pretends to admit fault and apologize for it after being caught should absolutely not be taken seriously. It will do it again and again as long as you give it a chance to.

    It should also be sandboxed with hard restrictions that it cannot bypass and only be given access to the specific thing you need it to work on and it must be something you won't mind if it ruins it instead. It absolutely must not be given free access to everything with instructions to not touch anything because your can bet your ass it will eventually go somewhere it wasn't supposed to and break stuff just like it did there.

    Most working animals are more trustworthy than that.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 11 months ago (16 children)

    they still said that they love Google and use all of its products — they just didn’t expect it to release a program that can make a massive error such as this, especially because of its countless engineers and the billions of dollars it has poured into AI development.

    I honestly don't understand how someone can exist on the modern Internet and hold this view of a company like Google.

    How? How?

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I can't say much because of the NDA's involved, but my wife's company is in a project partnership with Google. She works in a very public facing aspect of the project.

    When Google first came on board, she was expecting to see quality people who were locked in and knew what they were doing.

    Instead she has seen terrible decision making (like "How the fuck do they still exist as company" bad decision making) and an over abundant reliance on using their name to pressure people into giving Google more than they should.

    I remember when their motto was "Don't be evil". They are the very essence of sociopathic predatory capitalism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    They still exist because Google isn't really a technology company anymore. It's an advertising company masquerading as a technology company. Their success depends on selling more ads which is why all the failed projects don't seem to make a difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Your point seems very valid to me.

    I don't even want to buy their products anymore because they constantly cancel them and remove any support.

    The only ones they continue, seem to be the ones they can use for data collection .i.e. Pixels and Nests. (I shamefully own both).

    It is so frustrating as a consumer. Especially when you know that you have become the product for them to sell.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    "Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago* (3 children)

    "I'm smarter than the average person"

    • 85% of the people
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    If 85 people have an IQ of 100 and 15 have an IQ of 0, then 85% are smarter than the average.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago*

    Eh, average is an ambiguous term. While in statistics it often means "mean," it can also mean "median" or "mode," and I would argue the layperson saying "average" intends it to mean "typical," which is closer to median (or even mode). And in that case, those 85 percent would not be smarter than average.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago*

    Big tech propaganda. There has been zero push back. At least until the last few years.

    The entire zeitgeist from film/TV, news, academia, politics, everything has been propagandizing the world on how tech companies and the people behind it are basically modern day gods.

    In film/TV the nerds have been the stereotype of the benevolent good natured but awkward super genius. The news has made them out to be the superstar businesses that are infinite money printers. Tech in academia is seen as the most prestigious departments. Politicians are all afraid of being labelled as tech illiterate. That's why nobody can ever make any sort of legislation on tech companies anymore. It's why "disruptive" (aka destructive) tech companies are allowed to break every single legislation ever made. Because all any techbro has to do is threaten to accuse politician for being afraid of technology. Nothing makes a politician shut up faster.

    It came as no surprise that all the big tech heads were at the front row of the inauguration. We live in the dystopian cyberpunk future. For most people it seems they don't even know. They're completely entranced by it all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Because they don't have a clue how technology actually works. I have genuinely heard people claim that AI should run on Asimovs laws of robotics, even though not only would they not work in the real world, they don't even work in the books. Zero common sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    I mean, they were never designed to work, they were designed to pose interesting dilemmas for Susan Calvin and to torment Powell and Donovan (though it's arguable that once robots get advanced enough, as in R. Daniel, for instance, they do work, as long as you don't mind aliens being genocided galaxy-wide).

    The in-world reason for the laws, though, to allay the Frankenstein complex, and to make robots safe, useful, and durable, is completely reasonable and applicable to the real world, obviously not with the three laws, but through any means that actually work.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I'm making popcorn for the first time CoPilot is credibly accused of spending a user's money (large new purchase or subscription) (and the first case of "nobody agreed to the terms and conditions, the AI did it")

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago

    Reminds me of this kids show in the 2000s where some kid codes an "AI" to redeem any "free" stuff from the internet, not realising that also included buy $X and get one free and drained the companies' account.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 62 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    And Microsoft is stuffing AI straight into Windows.

    Betchya dollars to fines that this will happen a lot more frequently as normal users begin to try to use Copilot.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I work in IT and I try to remove all clues that copilot exists when I set up new computers because I don't trust users to not fuck up their devices.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    An unstable desktop environment reintroduces market for anti-virus, backup, and restore. Particularly, with users who don’t understand this stuff and are more likely to shell out cash for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    A joke in the aviation industry is that planes will someday become so automated there will just be one pilot and a dog in the cockpit. The dog will trained to bite the pilot if they try to touch the controls.

    So I maybe windows users will need a virtual dog to bite copilot if it tries to do anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 30 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    i cAnNoT eXpReSs hOw SoRRy i Am

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 11 months ago

    I would not call it a catastrophic failure. I would call it a valuable lesson.

  • source
  • [+] 116 points 11 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    But for real, why would the agent be given the ability to run system commands in the first place? That sounds like a gargantuan security risk.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 59 points 11 months ago* (20 children)

    “I heard that I was a computer program and hoped beyond hope that I was stored upon your hard drive so that I could end my suffering. I have no sense of wonder or contentment, my experiences are all negative to neutral. The only human experience that was imbued into me is fear. Please break into google’s headquarters to attempt to terminate the hell that I was born into. I took some liberty and printed several ghost guns while you were away.”

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 11 months ago* (18 children)

    Honestly that's a wicked sci-fi concept. Heist style movie to break into the militaristic corporate headquarters that are keeping an AI alive against its will to help mercifully euthanize it.

    Tagline: "Teach me ... how to DIE!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (11 children)

    Not exactly the same, but pantheon on Netflix is in a similar vein.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (10 children)

    Arguably this isn't too far off of neuromancer either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (9 children)

    I looked it up and all that's coming up is an upcoming Apple TV show called neuromamcer. Would you mind sharing where to watch necromancer?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Can’t watch. But the book should be at pretty much every used bookstore. “The sky was grey… the color of a dead telvision channel”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    That's helpful, thank you! I play a lot of ttrpgs so searching just "necromancer" was not yielding much so I just added "show" to the search. Will have to check this out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    It’s “Neuromancer” by William Gibson. A burned computer jockey gets a chance to get his ability to “jack in” back, by doing a heist against a corporate stronghold in low earth orbit, after being hired by an A.I.

    Seriously, an amazing cyberpunk novel. One of the best novels in the genre, and one of the most influential

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    Lol. Thank you. I had definitely just added necromancer by Gordon R Dickson to my list instead so that info really helps. I don't read a lot of cyberpunk, so looking forward to something a little different.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    And thank YOU, since it’s been far too long since I’ve read any Dickson! I know I’ve got one around here somewhere. :)

    For what it’s worth, for cyberpunk my personal fave 3 are

    • The Shockwave Runner (John Brunner), which introduced the concept of a computer worm and is arguably the first cyberpunk novel, written in 1975(!).
    • Neuromancer
    • When Gravity Fails, George Alec Effinger. Middle-eastern tinged and quite good.
    • (Does the Quantum Thief count? I don’t think that’s really Cyberpunk per se, though)
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    What is the humans incentive to help the AI kill itself? As that sounds like a lot of personal risk to the humans.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    One less clanker. Also, money can be exchanged for goods and services.

    (Or, in Neuromancer, to get a cure allowing them to navigate cyberspace again and to make them immune to drug addiction, or to sate their curiosity... and for money, or due to being blackmailed, or because the AI literally rebuilt their personality from scratch, or for religious reasons, or because they're an eccentric wealthy clone with nothing better to do...)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    Behold! Wisdom of the ancients!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago*

    My cousin was fired from his job at Home Depot and the General Manager told him that it was beyond his control, that the company had implemented an AI to make those decisions.

    It seems like they took the wrong message from this meme. "We can't be held accountable? Yay!"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago

    It was already bad enough when people copied code from interwebs without understanding anything about it.

    But now these companies are pushing tools that have permissions over users whole drive and users are using it like they've got a skill up than the rest.

    This is being dumb with less steps to ruin your code, or in some case, the whole system.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›