top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 106 points 1 year ago (45 children)

I believe it, Windows bloat these days is so bad. I keep telling my friends Tarkov runs better on Linux if they'd just let me play the goddamn multiplayer I'd be golden

  • source
  • hideshow 45 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (36 children)

    I'm really curious to see what kind of performance gains the Xbox-mode or whatever they're calling it is going to provide. I don't know if it'll reach SteamOS levels, but it does legitimately look like they're taking the bloat's hit on gaming seriously with the Xbox-branded ROG Ally.

    The reality is that mostly people aren't going to leave Windows, so if Valve and Linux force Windows to improve it's still a win.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 36 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (25 children)

    I think we're beginning to see a serious shift about how people view Linux. I do think valve being on Linux will significantly legitimizes it, and drivers will become much more accessible for it. In the next decade I think we will see a big migration of gamers to Linux. Being on Linux myself, the experience is even more streamlined and less glitchy than just a year ago, just because of the widespread adoption of OS's like steamOS and bazzite.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [+] -21 points 1 year ago (24 children)

    Linux will never be mainstream while it's controlled by nerds. I mean there is no uniform interface (there's so many guitar options) and when people want to learn it, the support is from people who think "it just works".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (11 children)
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Still more consistent out of the box than the dozens of GUIs of Linux.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (9 children)

    This could be smart if the largest mobile OS, Android, didn't have dozens of GUIs/Styles depending on the manufacturer's whim

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (8 children)

    Android is still more consistent than PC Linux. Most Android interfaces are nearly identical. Give me and Android phone that I've never used before and I know how to perform the most common tasks without help. Not the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

    Ah so because you're familiar with it it's easier? Interesting

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)

    That is my point. With Linux as a PC OS people cannot become familiar with it because there are too many user interfaces. The Linux supporters as a whole need to pick one and push it and only it to be viable for the average Joe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    Why does it need to be dumbed down for the average joe?

    Why does guis need to be designed for the person not using it? Why not design them for the people using it now and improve them for the actual users of the software instead of the persons NOT using the software?

    Thats a stupid idea and that very line of thought is the brainrot that has led to the enshittification of so much the last couple of decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    You don't understand marketing and that people need a uniform experience. You need simplicity to get the average person. You're thinking as a advanced computer user, not a basic or novice user.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Why do average users need to use linux. Let them stay in windows if that's where they are happy. Making linux into a system just as shitty as windows will just replace shit with different shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    But that's the whole issue. Microsoft will continue to dictate how the internet and computers in general function if the regular users don't adopt something else. The regular users won't adopt Linux because the current users of Linux want to gatekeep Linux. You bitch and complain "why do people user shitty Windows?" Then when given an answer say "we don't want them using Linux anyway." You are showing exactly how fucking stupid you are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's almost as if linux users are a group of many individuals with different reasonings behind their vastly different goals and priorities and not one homogenous group. Who would have thought?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    You are completely missing my point. Linux will not be adopted by the masses which it needs to do to kill Microsoft's stranglehold on the industry while there is no uniformity to it. The idea of hating Microsoft but not wanting to make it easier for current Microsoft users to switch to Linux isn't coming from 2 sides of the Linux group. It coming from the same individuals. It's the worst type of gatekeeping.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Windows was for nerds in its early days

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Windows 95 launched like a rock concert and since computers came with Windows, everyone's experience was the same so you did have KDE installed then go look for help and have people say "no no no. Install Gnome" like you get with Linux. You want linux to be mainstream, you need to appeal to the average dumb person which means ditch all but 1 interface.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    The steamdeck a handheld gaming PC comes with Linux, and several handheld gaming PC's are beginning to follow suit, some PC manufacturers already offer Linux as an option. Even so, most gamers, which is who I was talking about, build their own PC's and pick their own OS's to begin with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    The Steam Deck is an exception as it has a highly specialized OS with functionality and optimization limited to one thing: playing games.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    Only there's a desktop mode that is easily accessible and opens up the device for all manner of uses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Many many features and functions missing. It's made for games.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    It may be made for games but it's a more tolerable desktop experience than a fully fledged Windows PC.

    Which features/functions are "missing"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    I mean, DOS was a base OS that had several frontend GUIs.

    Most Linux versions come with the frontend preconfigured unless you get specifically the server version of the OS.

    What's going to happen is one of the Linux front ends is going to see widespread adoption/support, and it's looking like it's going to be KDE Plasma. Hopefully the others aren't just abandoned and left to rot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    They’ve promised that exact same thing for like at least three major windows versions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I think this time actually does have the potential to be different. They're co-launching an Xbox-branded handheld PC designed to go head-to-head with the Steam Deck while downplaying the future of dedicated consoles.

    Microsoft's gaming division is going all-in on PC, so it matters more than ever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They said all those exact corporate blowhard promises when the introduced the gamebar and the Xbox windows store and a “gaming mode” lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Yeah, but they were also still making new standalone gaming boxes with a dedicated OS, and they didn't have the Xbox division take the lead on game mode.

    Linux and Mac gaming also weren't a threat, and the solution to a bloated Windows installation was more horsepower, which was relatively cheap.

    Now the market is completely changed. The Xbox Series S and X have had their lunch eaten by Playstion and Switch. Linux gaming is exploding because of the Steam Deck, while more-powerful Windows handhelds are performing worse with worse batteries than the Deck because of Windows bloat.

    Mid-range GPUs cost more than an entire high-end gaming rig from 5 years ago, so high-end gaming PCs are rarer than ever.

    Microsoft has to do something. And what they've chosen, for now, is to partner with Asus to launch a true Xbox-branded competitor to the Deck. To do that, they have to actually be competitive. There's 2 keys to that. One is Gamepass, and the other is moving Windows out of the way of the game experience.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    The reality is that mostly people aren't going to leave Windows, so if Valve and Linux force Windows to improve it's still a win.

    While I mostly agree with this, every time I see this mentioned it reminds me that MS-DOS Windows was not very popular, until a Microsoft employee offered to port Doom to DOS Windows, because he saw that if games ran on a platform people would use it and migrate naturally, that employee was called Gabe Newell. So I do have some hope that there's some bigger migration, and in fact we've seen the numbers steadily rising, and these sort of things tend to be exponential, so I wouldn't be surprised if it picks up speed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    DOS was the most popular OS for gaming at the time and Doom was released first on DOS by id.

    Gabe Newell and team ported it to Windows 95.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Windows was wildly popular prior to Doom. Doom for Windows 95 was a showcase for DirectX, not Windows.

    Doom was on more systems than Windows 95, yes, but that's a little misleading. First off, it was released several years before Window's 95. Secondly, people upgraded computers less often back then, and Windows 95 wasn't packaged with most systems and wasn't distributed online. You had to actively decide to go to a store and buy it.

    Third, the vast majority of Doom copies were the shareware version of the first campaign. It was tiny and free. People would bring their floppy to a friend's house, or they'd post it on a bbs for download.

    The port to Windows 95 was a technical showcase of the advantages of using DirectX. It showed that Windows had integrated features that could be used to enhance games with minimal development cost, and that games could be run without having to exit Windows to DOS, which was a huge hassle required for most games at the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Tarkov runs on Linux!? I thought they had kernel anticheat that didn't work

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Pvp doesn't work yeah, everything else does

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    dang i couldn't even get the launcher to work when i tried with lutris the other day

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    That's odd, my best guess is the version of proton lutris is trying to use is installed incorrectly. I had that issue in my laptop for awhile.

    I also had issues when I tried to install Tarkov on an NTFS drive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    it's possible, i tried several proton and ge-proton versions and was getting a dotnet error that it couldn't ensure a single process iirc

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Take aways:

    • Sample set is of 5 games
    • Lenovo drivers are much slower than Asus
    • There are 2 games where windows is neck to neck or better, 3 where SteamOS is far ahead

    Some doubts:

    • Did the author run the benchmarks few times to rule out shader compilation. 99%ile would be helpful.
    • I wonder if it makes sense to test DirectX10, 11 and 12 games separately to better understand where Proton has an edge.
    • I wonder what all settings can be tweaked in Windows to find potential fixes (core isolation, cpu boost, power profiles).

    Point is Microsoft and OEMs need to do better, however not every game or subscription services work on Linux, so in the interim time users should know what they can do to close the gap better.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Did the author run the benchmarks few times to rule out shader compilation.

    Why should the author rule it out? Honest question. If shader compilation leads so worse real world experience for gamers on Windows than SteamOS, it is a valid point to include.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Because I'm more curious about why things are the way they are just like the author, and would like to understand this with more data points, only making the comparison more helpful. I'm not saying author "should" consider impact of shader compilation, but I'm saying had they done, we'd understand the difference better.

    They added asus vs Lenovo drivers data points, which alone tells us that driver optimization is responsible to a great extent. All I'm saying here is more data is more helpful.

    Maybe even after taking care of that, the difference is huge, which will tell us its not enough to have precompilation of shaders. Maybe it does reduce the gap, telling us that potentially dx11 games might tend to do similarly.

    Saying "RTX 5060 is better than 9060 XT" with 5 games tested is one level of comparison, but if they are grouped into RT and non RT games, games with 8gb and 16gb VRAM requirements, games with and without nVidia partnership, isn't that just more detailed and an even better comparison point?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    This is really not surprising to anyone who has used modern windows and Linux recently. Windows is so incredibly bloated, whereas Linux is a true real-time OS basically out of the box.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Unless you use an RT kernel, Linux is not a realtime OS and certainly not a true one.

    Because, you know, terms have a meaning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Right but switching to an RT kernel is trivial for basically any mainstream distro. You can do it from the package manager.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    True, I just wanted to clarify that by default Linux doesn't run on an RT kernel.

    And tbh, an RT kernel is really not desirable for most applications, which is why it's not default. All these RT guarantees cost a lot of performance, and in most cases a guaranteed latency is not worth losing performance over.

    In fact, using an RT kernel would be just the opposite of what you'd want on a gaming system.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    While the bloat exists, even debloated windows wouldn't match proton because that's not the only reason. Despite bloat there are two games in this test the actually do similar or better than SteamOS. This means there's a confounding reason for the difference, not the bloat.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I recently switched from windows (with a debloat scrpit ran on it) to linux mint and I was shocked at how much faster it booted. When I turn my pc on I usually get up and do something else for a bit (not because windows is THAT slow but because I could spend the minute it takes to turn on to make lunch or something) and linux booted before I was out of my chair.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Did the author run the benchmarks few times to rule out shader compilation

    Really grasping at straws there, eh? I'm no big fan of Ars but I hope we can assume they're not quite that incompetent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's not a slight, as I said it's a doubt, not criticism. I'm not saying "did the author EVEN ..."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Your other doubts and concerns seem slightly biased, e.g. wondering what settings could be tweaked on only one of the systems being tested and then reminding us all that there do still exist some things that won't run on SteamOS. It's only that one that is outright ridiculous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Biased to what? Point of comparison is to figure out why things are the way they are and use that information to get the best of both worlds? It's not very helpful if the conclusion stops at "x is better than y".

    Going deeper into "why" Proton is doing better in 3/5 games but not in 2/5 will only help users of both operating systems to make better informed decisions and get everyone closer to root cause other than "bloated windows" or "just use linux", potentially even leading to improvements to both sides.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

    I found the same thing on CachyOS (another Arch fork). The increase for me was staggering. Lies of P went from an unstable 144fps on windows 11 with an overclock (OC) on my GPU to 200fps in Cachy. Settings were all maxed out at 1440p. I noticed a similar jump from other games. Modded and vanilla NBA 2K25 went a stuttery mess at 172fps (frequent dips down to 72fps) to a steady 180fps with NO dips (that’s my monitor’s limit). I like to test things on The First Descendent, and it went from an unstable 79fps with maxed settings to 119fps. And while I don’t have numbers for it, The Witcher 3 Next Gen (vanilla and heavily modded) run a lot smoother. But after ten years, that game has been optimized out the ass.

    I did notice, however, that the increase in performance diminished greatly as I turned down settings. On Windows 11, I would notice a way “higher” increase in frames. For Example, I could tweak settings in the First Descendent like Global illumination and increase frames in Windows 11 to 109fps, but still unstable. In Cachy, if I did these things, I didn’t really notice a meaningful impact.

    RT also performs slightly worse on Linux. But I figure anyone using Linux might be the same type of person to not care about RT.

    My hypothesis is that without the CPU resources being eaten up by things like Windows Defender, the CPU is able to process more data quicker, reducing GPU wait time. I don’t have data on that, I would need something as in depth as presentmon from Intel for testing. Arch has forks of that, but nothing nearly as in depth, and PresentMon has declined any Linux support in the foreseeable future.

    I should mention, the OVERALL jump is ~40% going to CachyOS. And we know that the jump from Windows 10 to 11 saw a ~27% hit due to the new Windows Defender.

    My system is 64GB of SK Hynix DDR5, 9070xt (on my Windows Partition it’s OC’d, but on CachyOS I leave it stock), and a 9800x3D that has been manually OC’d in the bios and a 240mm AIO. I leave the panels off my O11 D Mini. The motherboard is a Gigabyte X870 Aorus Elite (2x8 pins for the CPU delivery).

    For all the FPS data, I pulled it from Steam on Cachy which uses presented frames instead of actual frames. Basically, the frames the GPU is presenting to the monitor, not necessarily what your eyes are seeing.

    On my Ally, I also noticed a difference swapping to SteamOS. Something to keep in mind with anyone planning to do that, you can allocate up to 6GB of RAM to the iGPU before Arch/SteamOS gets affected. I just don’t see anyone telling you you can do this.

    Edit one day later- I played Enshrouded on CachyOS. I will report that my 9070xt underperforms at max settings. Unstable 80fps with dips down to 50fps, but the Frame Time Pacing makes it feel worse. It stutters like it’s running at 50. Turning down settings again only increased frames by 5fps, which is not marginal at these rates, but did not help with the stuttering issues. I think it’s rendering things similar to Minecraft. The comparison I have is my 7800xt, which at max settings a year ago was able to run in Windows 11 at 70fps, but equally unstable. Therefore, I’d hypothesize that if I ran present on I’d just see high GPU wait times.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 74 points 1 year ago (18 children)

    Games run faster on SteamOS with proton than Windows 11, Ars testing finds

    FTFY. I hate all these articles that downplay the heavy lifting proton (and all the tools that make it up) are doing. But "Proton makes games run better" doesn't get the same attention.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    Proton is amazing, but it's entirely overhead translating library/system calls to Linux. It's accurate to say they run better on SteamOS, not to say Proton is making it run better.

    Now maybe Proton makes them run better than a janky but native Linux port, but that's a separate statement about games being better optimized on Windows.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    They're not only being better optimized on Windows which results that running them through Proton is better. In a lot of cases Windows versions actually run, while native Linux don't, because there's no single stable API (ABI? Idk) on Linux and games break when you update your system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Proton is amazing, but it’s entirely overhead translating library/system calls to Linux.

    That is not at all true.

    but that’s a separate statement about games being better optimized on Windows.

    Is that though? You can't say X is better than Y when you're changing multiple variables. If windows had a proton equivalent and both games ran through it then yes that would be a direct comparison. But you can't say X + Y is better than Z (by itself)

    DXVK is a part of proton that also is available on windows. DXVK alone can get you double digit performance improvements on games. And that's not getting into all the one off tweaks users can do to proton to optimize the game. Enabling pre compiled shaders gave a huge performance boost for Elden Ring.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 18 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The compatibility layer is overhead, but the key difference for many games is that DXVK swaps directX for Vulkan, and Vulkan often gets better performance.

    The performance gains of using steamOS are twofold, there's less OS load (this is particularly noticeable in low performance games, windows will consume much more battery on a game like Dead Cells than SteamOS will), and there's also a vulkan performance increase for some games. My understanding is if you see a big performance increase in a demanding game, that's usually thanks to vulkan.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    There is overhead but Vulkan allows you to batch draw calls in a far more efficient manner. It can also generally use multi threading to feed a GPU even if the game isn't coded with that in mind. Basically Vulkan offers so many improvements to efficiency and parallelization that the overhead is a drop in the bucket compared to the overall speedup in draw call optimization alone.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    But you can't say X + Y is better than Z (by itself)

    I mean, yeah, you absolutely can. Especially when X + Y and Z are both common configurations, and using X or Y by themselves is uncommon or a known bad setup.

    Sure, you can't be certain which of X or Y is making the differences in the comparison, but the comparison can absolutely be made.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] [S] 14 points 1 year ago

    I’m not sure it’s a Wine/Proton thing, it’s quite likely to be suboptimal at some things because it’s reverse engineered (not to diminish technical marvel that it is and decades of effort). Regular desktop Windows has just way too much overhead coming from everywhere.

    As a side note, back in the day when Nvidia released drivers for FreeBSD using Linux binary compatibility layer was even faster than Linux for gaming.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Yes but Microsoft Teams runs like dogshit on my Linux laptop. Checkmate atheists.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    😭😭😭 Sadly, Microsoft Teams runs like dogshit everywhere

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    But have you tried Outlook (NEW) and Teams (NEW)?? Microsoft made changes to deeply integrate copilot into them, while making the UI unintelligible and broken as well. It's a much more authentic Windows experience

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    We'll have to see if that's the same with the Xbox Ally.

    I'll be laughing if its still outperformed

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The XBox Ally could still be worthwhile if it ran XBox One and backwards compatible XBox 360 and XBox games. I don't know why Microsoft didn't do that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    It is more impressive when you realize that those games were meant for Windows and require a translation layer (Wine and DXVK).

  • source
  • [+] 21 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Preach. Studios that make games with anti cheats and what not should reconsider how they handle Linux as they'll only get even more players, who'll probably be even more loyal due to their Linux compatibility. I know cheating is a big issue in online games, but adding invasive kernel level code to detect that is just adding system level vulnerabilities just to prevent cheaters from cheating seems like an overkill. It's not like cheating mouse and keyboards don't exist and cheaters have evaporated entirely due to anti cheat.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Wow, some of these are showing huge gains with Steam OS

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    80 comments in c/linux_gaming@lemmy.world view that post
    35 comments in c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca view that post
    23 comments in c/steamdeck@sopuli.xyz view that post