all 35 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 67 points 11 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 28 points 11 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 45 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Perhaps it's cumulative. 200lbs worth of cats total.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 11 months ago

    Do you know if they actually check? My leopard has let himself go a bit and may not be typical.

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 11 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 25 points 11 months ago

    If I let my Leopard eat the landlord's face I won't pay any rent. Sounds good.

    $35 a month pet rent...

    Fuck the capitalistic system, may the landlord's all die.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago

    Do you have the address been looking for somewhere to rent that i can keep my Leopard?

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    So a small female leopard would be allowed?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago
    [–] 7 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    What if my tiger is still a baby? 🤔

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    Monthly pet rent?! Is this a pet sitter?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (4 children)

    I don't think ita unreasonable to do so, but it should not be in addition to the deposit. Should be one or the other.

    Like, over time it's more likely for damage from pets to build up and can easily get over $250 after a year or two.

    But good luck getting over $250 damage in 2-3 months.

    So I would see it reasonable to charge per month per pet, in the assumption that there will be damages to fix building up over time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    deposit is the only acceptable thing here… rent? no way! you don’t pay rent per person in the house. the landlord is losing nothing per month for your pet

    the potential damages come from the additional deposit/bond

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    So a pet should have a deposit or added rent but not a child? Or a second tenant? Is none of this the point of an overall damage deposit

    Slippery fuckin slope.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    Seems reasonable

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    The extra fees may sound unfair, but as long as my baby can scout her own food it all balances out.

  • source
  • [+] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    If you can get a tiger through the door, I don't think anyone is going to argue with it.

  • source