441
We are good up to Leopards. Sorry about the Tiger. (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 11 months ago by to c/funny@sh.itjust.works
34 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Monthly pet rent?! Is this a pet sitter?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (4 children)

    I don't think ita unreasonable to do so, but it should not be in addition to the deposit. Should be one or the other.

    Like, over time it's more likely for damage from pets to build up and can easily get over $250 after a year or two.

    But good luck getting over $250 damage in 2-3 months.

    So I would see it reasonable to charge per month per pet, in the assumption that there will be damages to fix building up over time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    deposit is the only acceptable thing here… rent? no way! you don’t pay rent per person in the house. the landlord is losing nothing per month for your pet

    the potential damages come from the additional deposit/bond

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    So a pet should have a deposit or added rent but not a child? Or a second tenant? Is none of this the point of an overall damage deposit

    Slippery fuckin slope.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •