this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025

441 points (99.6% liked)

Funny

funny@sh.itjust.works

16,714 readers

3,904 active

94 users here now

General rules:

Be kind.
All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago

moderators

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

example@reddthat.com

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works

We are good up to Leopards. Sorry about the Tiger. (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 11 months ago by Lisk91@sh.itjust.works to c/funny@sh.itjust.works

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

So a pet should have a deposit or added rent but not a child? Or a second tenant? Is none of this the point of an overall damage deposit

Slippery fuckin slope.

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

landlord can't legally charge more for children

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 11 months ago

Hmm I wonder why, maybe because they tried and people were sensible enough to push back.

parent