Venezuela has accused Donald Trump of making a "colonialist threat" after he said the airspace around the country should be considered closed.

The country's foreign ministry called Trump's comments "another extravagant, illegal and unjustified aggression against the Venezuelan people".

The US does not legally have the authority to close another country's airspace, but Trump's online post could lead to travel uncertainty and deter airlines from operating there.

top 68 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 66 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I’m old enough to remember when trump would pretend to be opposed to foreign military adventures. He literally built his political career on shitting on the neocons that launched us into illegal wars like what we did in Iraq.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago

    Im certain the nobel commitee is currently scrambling how to not give him an award without triggering an international incident.

    And the actions surrounding Venzuela kinda prove that Trump is willing to go to war to receive his peace price.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    You're not wrong. But what is missing is all the cult building that he did since them. He built his entire political career on mentioning things other politicians refused to mention and then gaining loyalty for it. While, at the same time, literally doing nothing about any of the popular ideas he mentioned.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 50 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    Just so it's clear, Venezuela has ample oil, and holds one of the world's top ten supplies of fresh water.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    i think they have 2nd highest amount of oil/gas deposit outside of the ME.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    Actually they have the largest proven oil reserve in the world, although it is a composition that needs more processing to turn into fuel. Which may make it unique for precursors for certain plastics, pharmaceuticals or advanced materials.

    Top estimated reserves are:

    1. Venezuela 48 Gm³
    2. KSA 42 Gm³
    3. Iran 33 Gm³
    4. Canada 26 Gm³

    As for gas reserves, it's

    1. Russia 47.8 Tm³
    2. Iran 33.5 Tm³
    3. Qatar 24.3 Tm³
    4. USA 9.1 Tm³
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 88 points 11 months ago (17 children)

    The post above this was:

    As Epstein files release looms, questions abound on what happens next: ‘Possibilities are endless’

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 11 months ago (14 children)

    If the prediction markets weren't all owned by Trump and his cronies I would bet that boots go on the ground whatever day they are supposed to turn over the files.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (13 children)

    I’m ignorant of the culture and structure of these markets still.

    Would the market have to set up a bet for this? Can you propose it? How would it work?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    It's unregulated bookies. You would be better off betting a stranger in a pub.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Its like 90% timing of politics too. So since they are all either owner by Trump and his inner circle or are friends with them they can just call Trump up to delay or accelerate something a day of the odds get too lopsided.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (9 children)

    There's Bookmakers, who are professionals responsible for estimating likelihood of events using maths

    But they can become corrupted, or simply told "you're not allowed to accept bets on this subject, ever, or lose your license"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 11 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] -1 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    You DO know that Asimov's Foundation series has been around for at least 70 years now, giving humans plenty of time to make fancy posters and cover art?

    Bluntly, your type of "Ew, AI slop", is dumb and disingenuous. It became an excuse to hate stuff, no matter the merits, context, or source.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    Yes I'm aware the book series is from the 50s, it's excellent.

    But the image is AI slop. It's very clear of that. Have a look at the letters around the edge, they blur and artefact in a way no human would do, and the same generic overly rendered hair that they always have in AI slop.

    I'm on about the ugly-ass image, which is very very clearly made by AI.

    Another telltale sign is inconsistent level of detail, stuff like a heavily rendered background element right next to a loosely rendered foreground element, something humans would never do.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    If you don't see it, I dunno what to tell you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    And you fail to explain whatever it is that makes it AI, let alone why that would be a bad thing. It is on anti-AI people to prove that their beliefs have merit. Careless speculation such as yours is irresponsible, unjust, and is pretty damn likely to hurt real people.

    You are welcome to dislike AI - but using that as a crutch for falsified criticism is just plain wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago* (1 child)

    I don't usually engage with trolls, but my train is late and I'm all out of productive things to do while I wait.

    I am not going to debate whether this is AI. If you want to believe it isn't, you're welcome to do that. As for why it'd be bad - I believe that a technology that is trained on the work of many artists, without permission or compensation, that puts control of visual - I am not going to call them artistic - outputs under the control of a few tech oligarchs, is bad, and should be boycotted and sabotaged if possible. Even open weight models are, ultimately, usually trained by large corporations, and openly available by their 'benevolence'. If they decide their next generation model will be closed source, it will be.

    I also believe that the sheer amount of both monetary, and physical, resources currently expended on generative AI and related technologies is largely wasted, in a world where we can hardly afford such waste.

    Also, please substantiate why using rather clear signifiers of ai generated content to claim something is ai generated is likely to cause harm, and why, in your eyes, 'pro-ai' aren't required to proof the merit of their believes.

    Oh, and while we're at it - do you happen to know whether there is a seahorse emoji?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago*

    I have no idea what a seahorse emoji implies, and never had the desire to use one.

    Anyhow. I personally believe that AI can be used to empower the common person, provided that it is available and publicly funded. Something along the lines of Switzerland's Apertus could be very helpful. Be it keeping an eye out for discount goods, pairing news with investments, or determining the legality of a Kavenaugh Stop, AI can make it easier for people to have agency in their lives. But that is dependent on whether we support the establishment of that agency.

    I personally feel that anti-AI people are bad for the future of humanity, because they encourage the 1% to become the sole owners of AI, by trying to deter the ordinary person from becoming masters of it. Rejection of tools and power, only ensures it is used by the worst people.

    Also, all existing human artists derived their skill and creativity from observing the works of other people. IMO, the same can be said of AI. While an AI currently isn't fit to independently create original works, eventually it will be able to make great creations, be it in collaboration with a human partner or by itself. It is simply a matter of when that AI becomes capable. Of course, I can't prove that - but neither can the technology vegans. We will have to see in a couple of decades.

    AI, being a technology, will become more economical and effective over time. My gaming rig isn't well suited for running medium-sized AI like GLM Air, but it is an AM4-socketed machine. When a post-AI boom socket is released, such as AM6, the memory and PCIe lanes for it will be much faster and larger to account for AI usage. It is through the improvement of software and hardware that the progress of AI will march forward. For example, we can expect GLM to run about 30% faster on consumer hardware once MTP is implemented in LlamaCPP. A prompt that took 40 minutes to generate an response for me, becomes 28. Time savings like that, translate into less energy and heat being needed to run AI. It isn't dissimilar to how aircraft massively improved over time.

    As to why the Pro-AI don't need to prove our beliefs: we aren't claiming that people aren't artists, nor are we trying to make other people feel sucky. We just want to do neat things for our folks, without bothering other people. Anti-AI folks tend to throw around accusations and generally be jackasses. It is why court systems and society needs the accusers to prove their points, otherwise they will just bully people for anything and everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    he using nixons method, go to war with drugs/vietnam, in order distract from his political problems, its a time honored tradition amongst conservatives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 35 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (9 children)

    What's even the thought there, you shot boats claiming they had drugs on them, are they claiming every plane is also carrying drugs? Why wouldn't they just intercept them at the runway in the U.S. to sieze the drugs if any of it was drugs coming to the U.S. supposedly?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    Precursor to an invasion. It’s basically a warning to the rest of the world: all flights going to, from, or through Venezuelan air space would do well to divert around it because soon that air space is going to be a war zone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    He's showing he's trying to be a real threat. Now they're sending in the military to scare Venezuela into a good deal for resources or else.
    It won't work. Internally, Congress is already calling out the illegality of attacking the boats. Congress won't allow a war and has already figured this out enough to tell the military to not follow illegal orders. It's still a sticky situation, but Venezuela's best move is to warn people and wait it out.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago*

    They have answered that question and they said that "the drugs" in those planes is still in transit between other countries. So the planes and boats are not directly going to the US but indirectly.

    Allegedly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Oh, Mr Nobel peace prize is just grouchy.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Don’t worry everyone. Some democrat will post a very safe and polite tweet soon.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Wouldn't 'Imperialist' be more accurate than 'Colonist' though?

    I don't think Trump wants a new American Colony in Venezuela, he just wants their resources and (unpaid) labor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    I mean it's basically just declaring war. It's the US acting unilaterally to attack a foreign nation for no reason at all. Granted that's nothing new, but at least with Iraq and Afghanistan, Bush got permission from Congress through the Iraq Resolution (and the AUMF Against Terrorists Act in Afghanistan's case) before he actually invaded. I get the feeling Trump isn't even going to ask, he's just going to attack Venezuela, get dragged into a war, and die.

    Then again, Obama attacked Libya without congressional approval, and while Congress could have done something about it, they didn't.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    They have oil. That's the reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    It's not even good oil though! It's hard to refine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    But the US has a lot of refineries on the Texan coast, which are designed to refine Venezuelan oil. Canadian crude can not be easily supplied, due to KeystoneXL having been blocked and Mexican crude is just not enough to run those refineries at capacity.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago

    why not do something useful like ATTACK RUSSIA!

    fucking traitors.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Thr anti-war candidate, according to the nyt and wapo opinion sections

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Every single fucking MAGAt, including Barron, should be lining up at the US Army recruiting offices signing up for 11 Bravo.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    It Is a colonialist threat

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    Fuck this nazi shit country of the united christofascist goat fucking america

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    Just wait 'til Trump sets his eyes on Colombia and Panama. There's a reason he's unilaterally renamed that gulf...

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago

    He's desperate to use anything he can to declare martial law, either by triggering mass anti-war protests or simply using the war as an excuse to suspend elections.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›