It probably was drugs - but that is not the point. It's wildly unethical and a violation of many rules of war to simply kill people like they are doing.

We don't summarily execute people at the president's say.

There was the one high profile commander who stepped down du to this. Wish more would follow suit since it’s technically illegal for all involved to disobey orders unless they all do so collectively.

Unfortunately the US doesn't consider that one to be an illegal order. It is heartless, and unnecessary. But ever since the advent of airpower the US has maintained that planes, helicopters, and drones are not required to accept surrender because it is impractical to impossible in any given situation. So the standard is usually to keep firing. Desert Storm and Iraqi Freedom had notable exceptions with mass surrender instructions dropped beforehand. And again, I know that's not reassuring. But this is why politics isn't supposed to be a team game. This is the level of power we are making decisions on. For other things that are completely legal but most people don't realize; heavy machineguns can absolutely be used to target individual soldiers; Flamethrowers are still 100 percent legal against military targets; You can be shot after your surrender is accepted, (I'll expand below); You will be shot if you do not or cannot actively surrender; and Nobody respects the rule against shooting medics and medevacs.

To expand on the most inflammatory one, the only time you are "safe" is while you are in custody. Modern combat operations move very fast and surrendering people are often left in place after their weapons are removed/destroyed. If they don't actively surrender again to follow on forces then they are legal targets because we haven't developed psychic powers yet. This especially matters with surrendered wounded who may not be in a condition to surrender again. Shooting bodies as you advance is legal and expected in a war. You just aren't allowed to personally go back and shoot someone again without them presenting a new threat. With that information in mind you should also know the US military and any professional military sends multiple waves across a battlefield. It is incredibly lethal, by design.

I say all this not to call you out but to highlight that war is a giant bag of dicks that most people outside the military are still naïve about.

The other pressing thing here is this is an order to fire on a declared enemy, outside our border. Meaning the president signed a sheet of paper declaring them to be the enemy, Congress hasn't thrown a flag, and they are beyond the jurisdiction of law enforcement. That is very clear cut to the military. If you change any one of those 3 parameters then things go to gray zone or illegal very quickly. Someone asked me some months ago while Trump was vomiting about Greenland if the military would obey that order versus an order to hunt down and kill Americans inside America. And the answer is Greenland would be fucked but those Americans are pretty safe from the military. They are not however safe from anonymous DOJ task forces and DHS.

There's a big difference between this and shooting at unarmed American citizens who are legally exercising their 1st Amendment Rights.

it was not proven those boats were not carrying drugs nor have fuel capacity to reach the US coasts. They most likely killed fisher boats:

https://factually.co/fact-checks/justice/evidence-vessels-venezuela-us-drug-trafficking-e51d01

That's very cute of you to think that they will face consequences.

When? You expecting an election in the future?

The U.S. doesn't recognize the ICC and sanctions its officials if they investigate war crimes by the U.S. or its allies.

We briefly ratified the Rome Statute in 2000 but pulled out shortly after invading Afghanistan and shortly before invading Iraq.

No, the US would invade the Netherlands if they tried to investigate.

The us said it would invade the Hague of anyone were tried and attempted to be put on trial.

"all means necessary and appropriate to bring about the release of any U.S. or allied personnel being detained or imprisoned by, on behalf of, or at the request of the International Criminal Court"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Service-Members'_Protection_Act

Only for political opponents of west.

Too bad laws are only suggestions for the US government.

It's the Geneva checklist or Geneva suggestion for a reason.

Yea, this bothers me. At this point I agree that any politician that doesnt start fighting this Nazi is a traitor to the US.

1 billion venezuelans per 1 Austrian archduke

"Sir, what should we do this Martin Luther King day?"

Banning the griefer's Minecraft account would save countless lives.

Even of God dint exist i Hope these officers and soldiers and contributors go to where they can experience the suffering they caused