all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 18 points 11 months ago (8 children)

Since 2008 I feel that's all we've had. Cuts, austerity, and an overall decrease in public service quality and availability.

Why the fuck are we even paying taxes?

The money keeps getting funneled into private interests through corporate subsidies supposedly to help improve the economy. But these companies don't pay back their fair share and keep all the profits.

As a millennial, I'm so sick and tired of this shit. I've witnessed our society collapse since the 80's with this neo-liberal reaganomics BS. It's a failed experiment, but the people who benefited the most from it own the media that convinced the population that it's still the best system.

We need to do like the French and go on a general strike and start asking for our due. We deserve better goddammit!

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I'm gonna guess your postal starts with a T, K, or S.

    If so, you will have seen a really rough go after Mr Harper trashed a bunch of long-running programmes for short-term gain, and sold a lot of land rights to foreign interests. It was really bad Reaganomics.

    Since then you will have seen a revolving door of similar leaders, inexplicably voted in despite a history of disastrous resource management.

    I'm thankful that our federal leadership went from Absolute Worst Idea to Second Worst about a decade back. It's been rough, but our position through COVID was nowhere near as bad as it could have been.

    Right now we're dealing with a real shortage of doctors, as many of them left due to harassment during COVID, and replacing them will take a decade or more. There's nothing we can do but suffer it.

    But I agree we're not using our tax money enough on services. We're rebuilding infrastructure neglected for a while after maintenance that was rejected from so many bills. Our staffing is very low, and in trades important to keeping things running optimally. This downsizing scheme won't help. If we're going to rebuild things and repair our infrastructure, we need more people -- to add now and to maintain now and after.

    But right now, we don't have a better option. We have a worse one, and let's avoid that. But let's get that better option in place before we challenge the status quo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    We are paying taxes still because the rich need to pay less of them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (3 children)

    I'm not sure I understand the meaning of your comment. Can you elaborate? Do you mean they need to pay less because that's what they say they need or what they want?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I'm being sarcastic 😅. That's what they want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 3 comments in c/canada@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 6 points 11 months ago

    BUT SURE LETS INVEST LIKE A BILLION IN AI.

    Fuck’s sake.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago*

    Not surprising given the hiring spike under Trudeau. Like since 2019 public sector jobs increased at roughly double the pace of private sector, and had gotten to the point that public sector job characteristics skewed national averages on things like wage growth.

    So stats like the increase in national average incomes/wages, was largely driven by gains for public sector employees -- ones who's salaries are paid by the collective taxation of primarily private sector employees. It's sorta like seeing a spike in people demanding food, but no change in the number of farmer's supplying that food -- if the supply doesn't catch up quick, you're going to have less people (or at least, increased cases of hunger/starvation). Some people need to go back to farming, if you're going to keep an equilibrium. Especially if the people eating, have gotten union-pushed food/plate increases, have become significantly more numerous in comparison, and are getting far more of the total food supply by percentage produced.

    Significantly increasing taxes on the rich might help, though I imagine it still wouldn't be enough to support the recent increases in public sector costs. That's sort of moot though, as the gov in general is loathe to increase taxes on the rich.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Not surprising given the guy is a banker.

  • source