all 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 32 points 11 months ago (1 child)

You know someone’s toddler took the controls for the platypus design.
“I want a duck…but you can milk it. Poison! Like bad bad sting. BEAAAVER tail.”

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 11 months ago

    Life has convergent evolution. It's like when devs on different branches solve the same problem over and over again without telling anyone else or merging back to main so no one else has to code the same shit over and over again.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    To be honest, as someone who only very tangentially works with git – it fucking scares me.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    It's simple really. Like saving a computer game and then if something doesn't work out you can go back to a previous save game.

    It only really gets tricky when multiple people are continuing on the same save and you want progress from both when you load it. But you can leave that to the most senior person to figure out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I understand the basic concept, but what with all the forked diagrams and heads and mains and I just want to try something with my one changed parameter in one config file

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    It makes sense for distributed teams of contributors working on many features with governance what gets into main. For small co-located teams where probably collaboration and chronology are more important, not so much, but it’s the cool thing so people try use it for that anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago

    When you add a bunch of libs to the project but only use one function from each.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)

    Evolutionary trees pretty much look like a git tree in a large company: always changing requirements, only patches, rarely less code. It somewhat works and nobody understands why.

    I wanted to say that at least the programming language is always the same, but it's at least two.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago

    LOL how about horizontal gene transfer, and Eukaryotes being a merger of Alphaproteobacteria (and cyanobacteria for the photosynthesizing ones) and Asgard Archea.

    It's all interconnected, intertwined, nature man! Holobionts and shit.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    When I first saw a platypus in person I was amazed by how small they where. They seem bigger in most photos.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    When the project contains decades-old legacy code, but it still works in modern environments.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago*

    test in production:

    welp turns out it actually works fine, suck it losers

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    you know how all mammals were once fish? Well some of those intermediary species still survive to this day, like the lovable platypus :3 Also marsupials aka pouch things—one of those intermediary steps from layings like fish to incubating them in a placenta.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    We still filter out all our salt, then mix it back into our blood, a slight modification of a marine fish's method for dumping excess salt. Being terrestrial we can't afford to lose salt

  • source
  • parent