Despite his "no" vote, the Senate deal to reopen the government bears Schumer’s fingerprints

Either Schumer no longer has effective control over own his caucus, or he has permitted the deal to progress with a wink and a nod behind the scenes — and with a strident disavowal for the bank of cameras he famously loves — while taking Democratic voters for fools.

top 85 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 121 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

Now, Roginsky is “thoroughly disgusted,” she said. “I don’t understand why they would subject people to hunger and to layoffs and to flight delays and to missed paychecks for the past 40 days, if only to get nothing out of it now.”

...

Schumer, who was the target of near-universal vitriol among Democrats in March when he backed down in a budget battle that threatened to evolve into a shutdown, was quick to announce his opposition to the deal and he voted against it Monday night.

But in fact, his fingerprints are all over it.

Get rid of this useless piece of shit, Schumer needs to be in a nursing home.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 79 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Get rid of his weak Nazi appeasing ass...40 days for nothing

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It's so fricking infuriating because, literally we were actually seeing the cracks form. Trump admin is violating the hatch act, pushing "dem's have shut down the government", and yet poll after poll shows the american people put the blame on the republicans. Trump was constantly boo'd to his face at the commanders game... and the democrats had an amazing election where they won every contest they were in. I can't fathom a worse time to fold

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    the democrats had an amazing election where they won every contest they were in. I can't fathom a worse time to fold

    That's your answer right there: the moment the election was over, they went back to screwing over the voters on behalf of their owner donors.

    If the election had been a week from now, they'd have caved by Thanksgiving at the latest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    His whip voted yes. Either he can't even control his whip, or he orchestrated it.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It’s the latter. Just magically the 8 that are retiring or aren’t up for reelection just manically all got together at the same time to do this? Right…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I mean, it isn't magic. They also had more pressure because of snap running out. Also, some of them, like Fetterman, always voted against the shutdown.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 25 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Here is my bipartisan compromise and before you say anything and call me a centrist, hear me out:

    Schumer and McConnel BOTH tied together and in cement shoes at the bottom of a deep sewage pond.

    I know neither side gets much out of it at a glance but think of the implications and ROI.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    We could pay down a significant amount of the national debt just with ticket and PPV sales.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    When will people understand that it's mathematically impossible to pay off the national debt? Debt = money. The more money you print the more national debt you have. As long as you back your currency with debt instead of hard resources then paying off the national debt is as impossible as finding unicorns and dragons to ride.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    McConnell is a Republican and any Republican is worse than any Democrat, but as far as Republicans go he voted against the most Trump cabinet picks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 109 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    Democrats are honestly a bunch of fucking pussies at this point.

    There's a literal fascist authoritarian wannabe in charge and where's the resistance? Christ, MTG is being more critical of Trump than they are.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Resistance should be grassroots organized, please don't rely on the Democrats (or any political party) for that.

    Don't waste any time mourning. Organize!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Why not both?

    We're organizing locally, and won the last set of elections. But that doesn't mean we can't still expect resistance on the national level when there was an overwhelming victory in the last slate of elections.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Organize at the grassroots level to retake the Democratic party. People sorely underestimate the work and time involved in raising a new party from scratch. We already have an apparatus and, for about half of voters, a recognizable and somewhat trustworthy brand, although tarnished these last couple decades. Kick Schumer out. Alienate all the establishment assholes. Brutally reject the cowards and the bribetakers. Let the sun shine in so the healing can begin.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    “At this point” implies there were not pussies at some point. The Democrats have always been cowards.

    People keep forgetting it’s not left v right, it’s rich v poor. Democrat leaders are just playing their part.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    Two points:

    1. No one was calling for Chuck to go when he approved the previous budget without a fight. This is not because he folded but because he dared to fight. He will be replaced with someone who will never try to fight Trump

    2. The 8 Democrats that voted for this are not some traitors to the party. Republicans needed 8 votes so Dems gave them 8 votes. If they needed 20 votes they would find 20 Dems to vote with them. They chose the ones that are ready to retire or have no chances at re-election but if needed they would just go down the list and find more people. If you think Dems have a problem with 8 members you're delusional. Both parties have the same owners and the same goals. Don't get fooled by the theater.

  • source
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The blame was on the Republicans until Schumer decided to be a Nazi

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    I'm sure he'll write a strong letter

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    That was the plan all along.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Does anyone know the strategy or play for doing this? I mean, this seams super weak on the surface. I do know that the timing or the next negotiations would be advantageous, but geesh, that the best they got?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Elections are over. That was the stop gap. Now they have to reopen so people can get paid to go shopping for holiday season.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Ding ding fucking ding.

    They did to the people suffering the shutdown what tRump did to the people who voted for him. Told them what they wanted to hear, that he was gonna help them, got their vote, then walked away. We were ready to help weather the storm for our communities over the holidays. All the dems had to do was keep the message unified and refuse to budge until they put back what they removed. Heaven forbid these rich fucks, who share the same airspace as us normies, potentially miss flights and their rich donors lose profits over the busiest travel period of the year.

    Honestly, this would be the time for a general strike. We already did the legwork to help provide for those who would have gone without SNAP. Lots in my area set up little pantries at work, donated supplies to places catering to underprivileged families, and were ready to help neighbors over the holidays. None of that disappeared this week. I personally plan to refuse holiday shopping and continue giving what I can to food banks and local childcare facilities.

    Unfortunately, we're too disorganized and too many are forced to live a tightrope between poverty and wage-slavery to really see this on a grand scale. Still, I'll be the change I want to see and not begrudge those without the means to do the same. Despite the govt. and their rich-cuck donors, we only really have us and our communities to rely on.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    This is a really good question and ive not heard a good answer.

    Even schumer's stooges didn't really seem to know why they were doing it. 'It was the only deal' or 'it had gone on too long' are both non-answers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Every single elected democrat should be primaried from the left in 2028, full stop.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    8 democrats are not the entire party. The party is made up of individuals.

    • Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia
    • Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois
    • Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire
    • Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania
    • Senator Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire
    • Senator Angus King of Maine
    • Senator Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada
    • Senator Jacky Rosen of Nevada

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/democrats-who-voted-to-end-shutdown-b2861979.html

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You know Schumer was directing them, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    The entire DNC needs to go

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    It's just a structurally bad system. Disband parties, change the voting system to one that doesn't create a "vote against the other thing" dynamic (I like STAR voting) and fix campaign finance once and for all - the solutions exist but the ones in control would never allow them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Replacing First-past-the-post voting will allow yhe democrats to run alongside other 3rd parties without a spoiler effect.

    Electoral Reform Videos

    First Past The Post voting (What most states use now)

    Videos on alternative electoral systems

    STAR voting

    Alternative vote

    Ranked Choice voting

    Range Voting

    Single Transferable Vote

    Mixed Member Proportional representation

    I would never want blue conservatives to be unable to vote how they want. I would never want to do what they do to us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Huh, I wonder which Democratic member of the House or Senate said that

    For Roginsky, a self-described establishment Democrat

    Who?

    Julie Roginsky, a longtime Democratic strategist, television commentator and author of the Salty Politics online newsletter.

    Again, I agree Schumer should be replaced, but not in a heated coup that shakes up the Epstein investigation just in time for House Democrats to finally have enough votes to release the files.

    I find it so very, very odd, that other than Ro Kahnna, there seem to be no House or Senate Democrats jumping on this bandwagon (including the actual progressives members who aren't owned by Peter Thiel).

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Chuck the Chuck.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Chuck Schumer should run as Gavin Newsom’s vice president.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago* (1 child)
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    While I agree the Senate needs a new minority leader, does any congressional party leader truly control their caucus? Even Republicans can't stop members of their caucus from voting differently. It wouldn't be a democracy if they could.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    One or two, sure, sometimes.

    But eight of the 44? Nearly 1/5 of the Senate democrats, all at once? At least one was saying that they were "keeping leadership in the loop", too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Politicians aren't new to talking among each other & forming factions. They had 41 days to get there.

    keeping leadership in the loop

    Awareness doesn't mean leadership could stop them. If leadership positively encouraged them or didn't try to discourage them, then that would mean something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    If leadership couldn't get even one of the eight to reconsider on something this important to the entire party, or wouldn't, then they're not effective leadership.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    For all we know, they had discouraged the others until these 8 emerged that couldn't be discouraged. It's still a democracy: leadership can't just use a crowbar.

    The leadership definitely sucks, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -25 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Chuck Schumer voted against the capitulation. Blame the Senators who voted for it.

    Put aside your axe to grind with Schumer and make statements that reflect reality.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Ain't no fucking way Chuck Schumer isn't responsible for this. That motherfucker has been doing shit like this for a while. But, let's be fair and say, for some fucking reason, that Schumer had nothing to do with this. Then he has absolutely no control over his party, and he should go.

    Like, either he sucks at his job and needs to go or he coordinated this and needs to go. And I no longer think he is bad at his job. Out of touch? Yes. A fucking dipshit? Yes. But bad at his job? No. I am not stupid enough to believe that for one second.

    Which means we need to replace every Dem senator with progressives. Every senator should be followed everywhere by homeless people in their state. They should be seated next to starving families in restaurants. They should be forced to share medical treatments with the people whose healthcare they just sacrificed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Ain’t no fucking way Chuck Schumer isn’t responsible for this. That motherfucker has been doing shit like this for a while. But, let’s be fair and say, for some fucking reason, that Schumer had nothing to do with this. Then he has absolutely no control over his party, and he should go.

    Is that a joke? Senators are independent human beings, Schumer doesn't have a mind control device.

    He did EXACTLY what you all said you wanted him to do. Now, the goalposts have been shifted so you can continue to grind that axe. It's bad faith.

    Like, either he sucks at his job and needs to go or he coordinated this and needs to go. And I no longer think he is bad at his job. Out of touch? Yes. A fucking dipshit? Yes. But bad at his job? No. I am not stupid enough to believe that for one second.

    Do you have any actual PROOF that Schumer engineered the capitulation? Your personal opinions on the matter aren't really what's under discussion here. Just vague and unsubstantiated accusations, pretty Trumpian if you ask me.

    Which means we need to replace every Dem senator with progressives.

    Keep living in a fucking dream world. Any honest person knows that that is an impossibility. You're going to hold out for something that can't happen and in the meantime, Republicans will continue to control the country. It is BEYOND fucking stupid.

    Why do we need to replace all the moderate Democrats that did EXACTLY what you said you wanted them to do?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Ain't no fucking way you're not a troll.

    Why do we need to replace all the moderate Democrats that did EXACTLY what you said you wanted them to do?

    Because they didn't do what I wanted them to do. Obviously. Did you not read?

    Do you have any actual PROOF that Schumer engineered the capitulation? Your personal opinions on the matter aren't really what's under discussion here. Just vague and unsubstantiated accusations, pretty Trumpian if you ask me.

    Like, either he sucks at his job and needs to go or he coordinated this and needs to go.

    Idk, man, it's literally right there.

    You should try harder?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    The deal was the Republicans got their eight votes from senators that aren't up for election soon.

    It always goes something like that. It's never 30-40 senators or house members from the opposing side that vote for something when a deal is reached. It's always just enough, with the votes coming from the ones most able to take the hit due to not being up for election next time, in a safe seat, very high popularity, etc.

    Even when the minority leader admits to being part of the deal, they aren't necessarily part of the group voting for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago

    The deal was the Republicans got their eight votes from senators that aren’t up for election soon.

    And the proof that Schumer engineered it? Does he control every member of the party or not?

    That's a lot of convenient assumptions that prevent you from having to examine your preconceived notions.

  • source
  • parent