Yeah I've found Reddit to be complicated at best. Kinda drama driven most of the time. So I tend to lose interest and just go there on occasion for tech related stuff. Even less so now.

Yet another reason to stick with LibreOffice and other FOSS open source software.

Well considering I use a laptop and no couch....

I remember goldeneye. And yeah it would be annoying. You could probably plug the snipe commands onto the right thumbstick. But yeah trying to emulate 90s single stick controls onto double stick controllers is a pain. Almost as bad as trying to emulate a Wii lol.

Yeah and it's still inferior to a keyboard and mouse for FPS. Better for RPGs tho.

Just this last little while?

• FFVII (Intergrade)
• Above Snakes
• Kena: Bridge of Spirits
• Devil May Cry (DMC1) of the HD collection.
• Valheim
• Tales of Beseria

Of course they do: their jobs are becoming increasingly obsolete as AI gets better.

Everyone who I know who is antivax supports everything on that list. Boosting natural immunity, hygiene, better nutrition, any number of other health improvements.

When will people understand that it's mathematically impossible to pay off the national debt? Debt = money. The more money you print the more national debt you have. As long as you back your currency with debt instead of hard resources then paying off the national debt is as impossible as finding unicorns and dragons to ride.

I mean your premise seems to be that various diseases will reemerge and that will scare people into getting vaccines. But what if they end up healthier and so adapt in different ways? Better sanitation, immune boosters, improved forms of treatment, etc. What if the medical culture takes a totally different route because you allowed people not to get vaccinated?

And if you're wrong? What if those who are vaccine free do better? I mean you've got a good idea there with the A/B testing but what if your premise is wrong or the anti-vaccine crowd is right and they do end up healthier despite the presence of diseases?