all 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 19 points 9 months ago (14 children)
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    If it's made with GenAI it shouldn't be copyrighted if nothing else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    I bet you bought more slop games than you'd like to admit. This stupidity is boundless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (6 children)

    Really?

    How much did I just win from your bet?

    Since I own zero games with slop in them, what we have here is you just you talking out of your ass.

    The stupidity is boundless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (5 children)

    I dont even understand why you would think you know which developer is using GenAI. But keep your hopes up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (4 children)

    It sounds like you're a keen observer of human behavior, and know more about my purchasing habits and resolve than I do.

    By all means, continue to educate me on what I will and will not do, and give me some indicators as to when I will cave.

    You can start by telling me down to the cent, how much money I've spent on games on any platform since Tears of the Kingdom.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

    I dont understand your reply at all, are you implying you are the developer yourself? Otherwise this sound like a comment aimed at something completely different.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    I dont understand your reply at all,

    This is entirely a you problem.

    are you implying you are the developer yourself?

    No, you're just making things convoluted in your own head.

    Otherwise this sound like a comment aimed at something completely different.

    Once again, that's a you problem.

    The reality is that I made a declaration that I don’t buy slop, you challenged that and implied that I probably have. I then asked you to state which slop-inclusive games I've purchased (or any games since TotK), and then you failed to do so.

    Everything following that is you redirecting away from the fact that you ran your mouth with "I bet you bought more slop games then (sic) you'd like to admit.", but cannot name one slop game that i have purchased.

    Tl;dr: you wrote a check with your mouth that your ass can't cash.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (1 child)

    So are you seriously saying you didn't get my sentence as an implication that I doubt your ability to detect AI has been used in a game you bought previously?

    I mean this was my original reply and you went into some kind of defense for me not knowing what you bought or will buy. No shit Sherlock.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    So are you seriously saying you didn't get my sentence as an implication that I doubt your ability to detect AI has been used in a game you bought previously?

    You don't get to pivot.

    I said I won't buy slop. You said oh bullshit you've probably bought some without even knowing/how could you tell, implying that I am talking out of my ass.

    Produce the evidence that I have purchased some slop, or shut your fucking yip yap.

    I mean this was my original reply and you went into some kind of defense for me not knowing what you bought or will buy. No shit Sherlock.

    Your defense was to back down from your original accusation, and and attempt to shift the conversation away from that which you couldn't substantiate.

    Might I suggest that you just sit the fuck down, as you're too far behind to salvage your initial turd of a comment?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Bad news then: almost all software engineers will be using various forms of genAI for their work, let that be LLMs for coding or image generation for quickly visualising things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago

    Of course they do: their jobs are becoming increasingly obsolete as AI gets better.

  • source