Revenge (piefedimages.s3.eu-central-003.backblazeb2.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/memes@sopuli.xyz
 
"Caught a cicada that was keeping me awake at night. Well guess what asshole, it’s Baby Shark on a 12 hour loop" Picture of a cicada taped to two headphones

all 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Aren't their noises a mating calls? You should've played a porno to it. Or a romantic commedies? Not sure what would be the best equivalent

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    Tangential thought on mating calls:

    Imagine when I'm alone & sexually frustrated I just step outside and let out shrill continuous screeching bursts of noise until a man descends upon me and inserts his penis into my vagina.

    Wouldn't life be so much easier this way?

    Why must humans make mating such a complex psychological game involving money & cosmetics & material possessions & status & mental manipulation

    Why can't we just go outside & scream?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Cicadas don't buzz at night. It was your tinnitus.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    June beetles will get on your screens and vibrate, making a creepy noise people sometimes think is a cicada.

    We have mockingbirds that, when they become sexually mature, scream in atonal bleats all night long. You can't chase them off, they're in the trees and roofs. So you just lie awake, imagining a drone that could automatically fly around and shoot them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Ah yes, animal torture, humanity's favorite

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Do do do do do do do

  • source
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    Not really a fan of animal abuse posing as comedy.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I've laughed about jokes concerning dead babies.

    Shame you didn't like the joke, though, taste does differ.

    But I think you conflate the joke with somebody harming an animal, it's not proven that anyone did that in this instance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    There is a cicada taped to a surface - that's animal abuse, unless it's a dead one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    To be honest I never would have considered that somebody actually taped a live insect to something, just on feasibility alone, before these comments

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It wouldn't be hard to do with a cicada. It probably is a dead one, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Neither am I. But the post is done, and I can't under it. For the sake of my sanity I'm going to assume that: A. It was already dead B. nobody would do this because they would actually do this and even if it was alive it was just for the picture. Not that they actually left it playing music for 12 hours

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I'm not against OOP getting their revenge, but yes
    it's just an insect and you are just a human. ^[assuming you are a human. Not sure, but I'll go with that.]
    Just because it's suffering isn't as relatable to you as mammals, doesn't make it fine.


    I remember having been answered once for plants, on their responses to stimuli and poisonous features are "just evolutionary".
    Now, what most people find it hard to imagine, is that for some being significantly higher in the evolutionary path, can consider our brains as "just an evolutionary feature".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    I’d take it a step further—there is no evolutionary chain. A chain implies linear direction. I’d argue it’s more like a rhizome, evolving in a rather random direction at every moment. Intelligence as we know it is just (1) a single arbitrary attribute and (2) a single arbitrary form of intelligence. Something with more capacity toward intelligence might not even share the same kind of intelligence as us, which could mean their logic would be incomprehensible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Stop stop it’s already deaaaaaad

  • source