258
Revenge (piefedimages.s3.eu-central-003.backblazeb2.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/memes@sopuli.xyz
28 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
"Caught a cicada that was keeping me awake at night. Well guess what asshole, it’s Baby Shark on a 12 hour loop" Picture of a cicada taped to two headphones
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 41 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Not really a fan of animal abuse posing as comedy.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I've laughed about jokes concerning dead babies.

    Shame you didn't like the joke, though, taste does differ.

    But I think you conflate the joke with somebody harming an animal, it's not proven that anyone did that in this instance.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    There is a cicada taped to a surface - that's animal abuse, unless it's a dead one.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    To be honest I never would have considered that somebody actually taped a live insect to something, just on feasibility alone, before these comments

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It wouldn't be hard to do with a cicada. It probably is a dead one, though.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Neither am I. But the post is done, and I can't under it. For the sake of my sanity I'm going to assume that: A. It was already dead B. nobody would do this because they would actually do this and even if it was alive it was just for the picture. Not that they actually left it playing music for 12 hours

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It's just an insect

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I'm not against OOP getting their revenge, but yes
    it's just an insect and you are just a human. ^[assuming you are a human. Not sure, but I'll go with that.]
    Just because it's suffering isn't as relatable to you as mammals, doesn't make it fine.

    I remember having been answered once for plants, on their responses to stimuli and poisonous features are "just evolutionary".
    Now, what most people find it hard to imagine, is that for some being significantly higher in the evolutionary path, can consider our brains as "just an evolutionary feature".

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    I’d take it a step further—there is no evolutionary chain. A chain implies linear direction. I’d argue it’s more like a rhizome, evolving in a rather random direction at every moment. Intelligence as we know it is just (1) a single arbitrary attribute and (2) a single arbitrary form of intelligence. Something with more capacity toward intelligence might not even share the same kind of intelligence as us, which could mean their logic would be incomprehensible.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •