Dozens of reporters turned in access badges and exited the Pentagon on Wednesday rather than agree to government-imposed restrictions on their work, pushing journalists who cover the American military further from the seat of its power. The nation’s leadership called the new rules “common sense” to help regulate a “very disruptive” press.

News outlets were nearly unanimous in rejecting new rules imposed by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that would leave journalists vulnerable to expulsion if they sought to report on information — classified or otherwise — that had not been approved by Hegseth for release.

Many of the reporters waited to leave together at a 4 p.m. deadline set by the Defense Department to get out of the building. As the hour approached, boxes of documents lined a Pentagon corridor and reporters carried chairs, a copying machine, books and old photos to the parking lot from suddenly abandoned workspaces. Shortly after 4, about 40 to 50 journalists left together after handing in badges.

top 37 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 230 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Bravo to all those reporters rejecting this new opaque authoritarian!

Here's the second most important piece of into in the article:

Only the conservative One America News Network signed on.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 84 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Does anyone hear the propaganda if there is no one there to listen? The republicans are really fucking themselves on this one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 93 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    They could all also stop sucking his dick and start reporting on reality. Call a spade a spade, or a dictator a dictator. If trump loses the media, he loses a lot of his power to control the narrative. I don't believe that most of these news outlets have a spine and are willing to work together to tell the truth, but I can dream... Sometimes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    idk if i were a billionaire i wouldn’t want the economy as wildly fucked as it is and i’d be pretty keen on cheap exploitable immigrants

    i really don’t understand what they’re going for

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    It's all about money. They're making boatloads from the stock market dips. They won't care about immigration until it starts hurting them. Even then this administration will just bail them out

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Sadly, I think it's a win-win for the fascists.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 1 year ago

    The press only had a presence in the pentagon because it was advantageous to have them there. The media isn't disappearing just because they are no longer given easy access. They will just have less of a relationship with the department of defense. Yes, it's bad for the journalists, but it's worse for the administration. Those reporters had been there so that they could spread the official talking points. Letting reporters become dependent on their easy access and maintaining a reasonable working relationship makes it a lot easier to seed stories, to ask for small favors and to give off the record comments that shape narratives. Ol' Whiskeyleaks is failing at coercion and in the process is sacrificing influence. That he doesn't understand this is amazing considering he was (theoretically) a journalist until less than a year ago.

    As with so many things, they are destroying what their predecessors spent the last century building by being both malicious and incompetent.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Not explaining how this is a hallmark of authoritarian rule, but quoting the bullshit reasons the regime pretends to believe in is still a failing of the duty of the press.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

    There is essentially no legitimate mainstream media anymore. They've all been acquired by some late stage cap oligarch, so anything they print will be filtered through the lens of disseminating propaganda and manufacturing content on their behalf.

    Edit: I'm in no way advocating that "alternative" news is less bias or more trustworthy. The point is that you can't inherently trust ANY media by brand name recognition, the same way that you can no longer trust that brand name equals quality in general; that only applied when there was actual competition instead of a handful of corporations owning the majority of every industry, all sharing the same board of directors, reporting to the same few hundred oligarchs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago* (9 children)

    Ap news is solid. Their reporting is consistently high quality. With breaking news they dont try and report all the unverified information sticking close to what is actually known.

    You are never going to get news that isnt filtered through someone's lens. Alternative news is 1000x worse when it comes to disseminating propaganda.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    They did not include which orgs complied with the regime, or draw parallels to the "ministry of truth" authoritarian precedent that this action represents. Look at what they choose to omit.

    I never said alternative media is more trustworthy or less bias.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    They did not include which orgs complied with the regime...

    From the article in the OP:

    Only the conservative One America News Network signed on. Its management likely believes it will have greater access to Trump administration officials by showing its support, Gabrielle Cuccia, a former Pentagon reporter who was fired by OANN earlier this year for writing an online column criticizing Hegseth’s media policies, told the AP in an interview.

    They didn't? It sure seems like they did to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    APnews isnt there to list orgs that comply or draw parallels. Theyre a news site they tell you what's happening you read that and if you want to go further you can.There are plenty of other sites that will do that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    It's called due diligence, journalistic integrity, and reporting the facts.

    "They're a news site." isn't an excuse for not covering all the facts of the story, in fact, that's the exact reason they're being held with scrutiny. It is their job to provide as much information as possible. That's quite literally what news reporting is for.

    I want to insult you because tbh your comment is really fucking dumb.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Due diligence is checking your facts and sources are correct. Journalistic integrity is reporting on the truth even when its disadvantageous. None of those are broken by AP. They covered all the facts of the story.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    If they didn't list all of the orgs that complied (which they did anyway), they would not have been covering all of the facts of the story.

    If you can't wrap your head around that simple concept, you are someone that isn't worth engaging with.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    My comment that's older than their shows that they did name the one org that complied. I agree, the comment above is stupid, but the AP did do what you want. The person above just lied (through ignorance or on purpose) and said they didn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I don't see this as a win as I'm pretty sure they wanted less attention and questioning of their activities. It's easier for them to blame the press for walking than to put up restrictions that make it look like they're hiding things.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    A few months ago I would accuse Americans here of being a bit hysterical but not any more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    A lot of us are panicking because the future is crystal clear and we just cannot understand how so many people around us as being all business as usual.

    A friend of mine was getting tired of my “conspiracies,” so I agreed to write them down with the a date and when one of them happened I’d tell them. I’ve got pages of check marked items. “Believe me yet?” I say. 😡

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Any chance you could share some version of this list? For science

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    I’ll see about putting it together

    The big one on the list is martial law by June.

    I am also eyeballing the 401(k) system. I think within the year a significant number of people will start pulling out of it to live. I’m not sure if it will be enough to do any permanent damage, but it will screw over a ton of people… Who are not gonna forget, or recover

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    inb4 trump says he fired them all or some stupid shit.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I wonder if "FUCK YOU AND YOUR POLICIES" was written on any badges. Using a Sharpie, of course.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Honestly, this seems like a no-brainer. Having Pentagon press access means you get to break stories sooner, but if your only reporting what the Pentagon gives you, you’re basically just getting press releases a little earlier. That's not worth giving up you're ability to get an exclusive story from a leak, and there's always someone who wants to leak something. I'm sure that even these journalists' cooperate overlords see agreeing to this as a bad business decision.

  • source
  • 13 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    When you even have Newsmax and Fox walking out, you know the rules must be absurd from a business standpoint.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I hope someone said “”all the Americans are leaving, later Nazis” on the way out.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    So, with all the journalists returning their access badges, there will be no journalists left so the Pentagon can do whatever the fuck they want without snooping journalists around?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    Yep, that's a very common thing with these Trump policies, they are designed so he cannot lose.
    If they go along with it Trump wins, if they don't, the opposition to him won't have access, and Trump also wins.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The American corporate media have been bending over backwards to normalise the fascist takeover and that's still not enough for the Nazis. But will that have any real consequences? Of course not.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'll be honest, the narrative against journalism is starting to feel a little sus and a bit like a propaganda campaign.

    Not to say that there aren't plenty of things to criticize corporate media for, but I think turning in their badges and refusing to play the game was the right call in a no win situation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    Regardless of the pervasive reach of interpersonal social media and of the Internet in general (unless blocked by effective firewalls), control over the mass media emanating from the political center will still be our most important weapon in establishing our authority after the coup.

    – E. Luttwak, Coup D’État: A Practical Handbook. pp. 131.

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/usa@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    If you can't report the truth, then why bother showing up.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Nazis hate actual media, they only want to spread lies and propaganda. Like American cities on fire, when they're just dancing in the street protesting peacefully.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago*

    They dont believe its lies though. I think even the most evil person has convinced themself they are on the good side.

    We see this with Israel most recently, defending complete genocide of children and families while sleeping well at night, because they think its the right thing to do.

    Pretty insane.

  • source
  • parent