Dozens of reporters turned in access badges and exited the Pentagon on Wednesday rather than agree to government-imposed restrictions on their work, pushing journalists who cover the American military further from the seat of its power. The nation’s leadership called the new rules “common sense” to help regulate a “very disruptive” press.

News outlets were nearly unanimous in rejecting new rules imposed by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that would leave journalists vulnerable to expulsion if they sought to report on information — classified or otherwise — that had not been approved by Hegseth for release.

Many of the reporters waited to leave together at a 4 p.m. deadline set by the Defense Department to get out of the building. As the hour approached, boxes of documents lined a Pentagon corridor and reporters carried chairs, a copying machine, books and old photos to the parking lot from suddenly abandoned workspaces. Shortly after 4, about 40 to 50 journalists left together after handing in badges.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

There is essentially no legitimate mainstream media anymore. They've all been acquired by some late stage cap oligarch, so anything they print will be filtered through the lens of disseminating propaganda and manufacturing content on their behalf.

Edit: I'm in no way advocating that "alternative" news is less bias or more trustworthy. The point is that you can't inherently trust ANY media by brand name recognition, the same way that you can no longer trust that brand name equals quality in general; that only applied when there was actual competition instead of a handful of corporations owning the majority of every industry, all sharing the same board of directors, reporting to the same few hundred oligarchs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago* (9 children)

    Ap news is solid. Their reporting is consistently high quality. With breaking news they dont try and report all the unverified information sticking close to what is actually known.

    You are never going to get news that isnt filtered through someone's lens. Alternative news is 1000x worse when it comes to disseminating propaganda.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    They did not include which orgs complied with the regime, or draw parallels to the "ministry of truth" authoritarian precedent that this action represents. Look at what they choose to omit.

    I never said alternative media is more trustworthy or less bias.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    They did not include which orgs complied with the regime...

    From the article in the OP:

    Only the conservative One America News Network signed on. Its management likely believes it will have greater access to Trump administration officials by showing its support, Gabrielle Cuccia, a former Pentagon reporter who was fired by OANN earlier this year for writing an online column criticizing Hegseth’s media policies, told the AP in an interview.

    They didn't? It sure seems like they did to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    APnews isnt there to list orgs that comply or draw parallels. Theyre a news site they tell you what's happening you read that and if you want to go further you can.There are plenty of other sites that will do that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    It's called due diligence, journalistic integrity, and reporting the facts.

    "They're a news site." isn't an excuse for not covering all the facts of the story, in fact, that's the exact reason they're being held with scrutiny. It is their job to provide as much information as possible. That's quite literally what news reporting is for.

    I want to insult you because tbh your comment is really fucking dumb.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Due diligence is checking your facts and sources are correct. Journalistic integrity is reporting on the truth even when its disadvantageous. None of those are broken by AP. They covered all the facts of the story.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    If they didn't list all of the orgs that complied (which they did anyway), they would not have been covering all of the facts of the story.

    If you can't wrap your head around that simple concept, you are someone that isn't worth engaging with.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    My comment that's older than their shows that they did name the one org that complied. I agree, the comment above is stupid, but the AP did do what you want. The person above just lied (through ignorance or on purpose) and said they didn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)