The integration offers conversational, cited answers instead of traditional links and follows positive feedback from earlier tests in select markets. Perplexity will expand to mobile soon.

1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 1 year ago

Inb4 people here treat a search engine option like an antifeature

  • source
  • 59 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Firefox adding another search engine choice isn't really headline news to me but cool I guess, especially if it's another option that's not Google?

    I'll continue using something else, though.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's not a search engine, it's a random text generator disguised as an engine. It's worse than Google, if you can believe it. We don't need more shit that is worse than Google

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah it's pretty lame.

    I will say in its benefit that if there is to be AI-summaries as answers to search queries, this has the right ideas: List your sources atop, even have a separate sources tab, include direct quotes where possible (though this feature is weird, I don't always get it, maybe topic-specific).

    I still don't like it (just link me to the bloody source instead) but I know a ton of people who explicitly want those AI-summaries as their answers, and this at least exposes what was used to create the answer.

    Rubbish, but on a conceptual level doing better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    My main problem with that, is that it actually doesn't use the sources it lists. It does it sometimes, and other times the links have nothing to do with the generated text, and some of them might be also non existent, but because it's not always wrong, it makes people complicit, nobody actually checks the sources, but believe it more because the links are there.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 64 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Librewolf. You're welcome.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Has anyone figured out how to automate updates on macOS (ew I know, but it's my wife's computer)?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I just use homebrew with quarantine disabled (otherwise homebrew will auto-update the package with quarantine enabled again, even if you installed it without).

    I don't like macs. Just have to use one for work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Aaah, ok. I read the docs at https://librewolf.net/installation/macos/#homebrew but got scared when I saw "flagged as broken". I'll give it a shot anyway, thanks!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Homebrew has announced they're gonna stop supporting disabling quarantine. Which means I'm gonna stop using Homebrew, as most of their reasoning didn't make much sense besides "daddy Apple doesn't like it".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    pretty easy to just remove it as an option. settings/search/ scroll down to list of search engines, click perplexity, click remove. If enough people do this, maybe they will get the hint.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    How do I prevent new antifeatures from being added? How do I even know about the new antifeatures as they are added? Does Mozilla publish an RSS feed of each antifeature like this that they add, that gives a quick explanation of how to undo it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 54 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    I use librewolf via nix home-manager to declaratively configure preferences, plugins, engines, bookmarks, and policy settings. My librewolf configuration module is my largest config file by far... At least I don't need to reapply it by hand anymore, but I really wish Firefox didn't suck so much.

    Here's hoping ladybird is a success.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I’m not upvoting out of support for this move but to spread awareness

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Whereas I'm upvoting because I support adding options. If you don't like it, don't use it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    I really don’t know enough about Perplexity AI to have an opinion one way or another, which is why I’m upvoting for awareness. I can’t say whether it’s a good or bad thing, although I’m not optimistic given the general trend of shoehorning “AI” in whether it makes sense or not, but I’m sure there are actually useful applications for the product and a better search engine could be one. I want actual search results, though, not a generated slop answer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Why does AI need to be shoved into everything, honestly its not AI its just an LLM that summarizes your search, and plays as a yes man.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Because it costs money to add shit nobody wants so we need sponsors, to add more shit nobody wants…

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    "Almost nobody wants". Happy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Can you back it up with data? Or is it just what your bubble thinks? For whatever reason anti-AI sentiment seems very prevalent on much of the Fediverse, but the Fediverse as a whole is niche.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    Another reason not to use vanilla Firefox.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This is just a search engine option not some built in AI tool.

    No issue here other than fuck AI in general. Just don't use it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I have no idea why they call it "integration"? It's just a search option like any other search option.
    Personally I have 10 search options enabled already, so this is number 11, and if I don't like it, I will just disable it, which is dead easy to do, with a button for the purpose of changing settings right beside the search options.

    I tried it for 2 terms I know very well, and the response was very good, but I would never trust an AI response without double checking.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    How about not adding more AI shit instead?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I get that Mozilla needs to keep the lights on but... yeah.

    I've increasingly been meaning to switch to a fork. Anyone aware of a good way to self host a bookmark (and preferably tab) sync?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Good to see some diversification away from google.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Ones that work well take your natural language input, spend time searching and offer results. Not summarize anything. How well does perplexity work in that regard I wonder?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    I find that chatgpt and claude try to give you one answer and sounds mildly to very certain about themselves without giving references.

    Perplexity actually gives reference links for each claim it makes, which I find better because I can check it's work and fork off and explore further myself at any point along it's reasoning.

    As a definite AI Hater, I find it to be a good middle ground LLM / search engine

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Boooooo. I hope Mozilla is at least getting paid a shit ton of AI money for this.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago
    [–] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Once again Mozilla adds shit nobody wants and wonders why nobody uses Firefox anymore

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I mean honeslty why use base firefox when there are much better forks of firefox. Floorp for example which I like.

    If I want straight up firefox without the AI stuff then I'll just go use Librewolf.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    Why must they keep digging into their crate of foot guns....

  • source
  • [+] -13 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Can you read, mate?

    It's an optional choice for the search engine.

    YOU decide if and when and what to send there. What's the big issue here?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago*

    There are many ways, a popular choice would be managing your own recursive DNS resolver and then blocking the endpoint it contacts.

    PiHole - Non recursive but offers blocking capabilities, can make it recursive with Unbound.

    Technitium - Recursive but not nearly as user friendly as PiHole, also lacks the fancy Ui.

  • source
  • parent
  • 3 comments in c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 22 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Exactly what I do not want.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)