no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
29 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 108 points 1 year ago*

Well done MIT. Hopefully this will encourage others to stand their ground too, even if they're not so well equipped with other sources of funding as MIT.

  • source
  • [–] 84 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    "With respect, we cannot support the proposed approach to addressing the issues facing higher education,” the Massachusetts Institute of Technology president wrote in a letter.

    https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/WithDueRespect

    With Due Respect

    "Why is it that whenever someone says 'with all due respect', they really mean 'kiss my ass'?"

    — Ashley Williams, Mass Effect 1

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    This is particularly impressive considering 48% of MIT's funding is from the federal government. This is the largest percentage of any university.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    MIT is in a unique position to negotiate here though as that funding is a bargain for the US. And honestly MIT's reputation and capacity to attract the global top talent in stem will remain long after a funding battle unless they trash it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yeah being ranked as one of the best schools in the world will hopefully help them gain leverage. On the world stage there are only a few U.S. schools that say "the U.S. is still good at things" and letting MIT fall from those positions will make the U.S. look like their re-imagining of education is the complete failure we all know it is going to be. Would someone else take their place, yes. Will they be from the U.S., no. I was hoping UCF would reach that point somewhere along the line, but I'm biased and I think they got a boot on their neck for the last number of years that stopped them from research growth and diverted it to stupid Desantis shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's not even that, MIT has this reputation because they produce results. They're well known to be the upstream source of massive amounts of technological innovation with all the financial benefits that comes with

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm afraid the current administration doesn't care about the reputation of US institutions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago

    pretty sure MIT did the math

  • source
  • [–] 64 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    Universities have legacies to maintain. Some have already irreparably fucked that up.

    Looking at you, Columbia.

    Straight to the trash, any resume from Columbia. Sorry not sorry. Your institution is beyond tainted. Just tell me you got a GED instead.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm sorry how is that fair to current students or alumni who predate current events?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Fair isn't how things normally play out. If hiring was fair, the name of your University wouldn't have half the impact it does on law firms and such. Any good company will know they are still a good student if they graduated, but stains come from before/during/after no matter what.

    Were the Harry Potter books a great series for kids at the time, I say definitely. Do the stains from the authors views after they come out stain the actors/actresses who don't denounce them.. unfortunately yes. You see it in so many threads shitting on anyone willing to work on their upcoming series.

    Is it reasonable... Many people think yes, so they will lose audience. Many people think no, so they will keep that audience. If Rowling died, would that stain on the product still hold in 10 years.... It will stay for some forever.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago*

    Good; hopefully other universities follow.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    How can there be funding benefits of there is no funding? They kinda gave up their leverage

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    and to provide instruction in American civics to all foreign students,” the memo about the compact said.

    Of course, they will have to use the civics curriculum provided by the illegitimate MAGA Nazi government, which will be prepared by the Conservative Propaganda Machine.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    American history currently taught in schools is already colonial propaganda, they wouldn't need to change much. Most of the world learns a very different history of America, and it would be sufficient to expose them to the propaganda Americans grew up on.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Signers would be required to freeze tuition rates charged to American students for the next five years, among other conditions, according to the memo. In return, the schools would be given a “competitive advantage,” including priority for grants and invitations to White House events and discussions with officials, a White House official said in a statement.

    Going to the white house to talk to officials there does not sound like an "advantage" under the current leadership. It sounds more like punishment.

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago

    i was going to say, but MIT is a pipeline for Israeli weapons research industry, scientist, engineer that dont feel conscience when supporting israeli efforts.

  • source