top 95 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 149 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I thought it had had that for twenty years?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I think they are just making a ui to manage it natively.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I tried it during covid when wfh started. I found it really annoying to switch between personal and work profiles. I prefer the chrome way of asking which profile each time I click the icon or having two separate icons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Just add -P to Firefox launch flags once and then selected "prompt me everytime". This also has been true for rlike 20 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Impressive that theyre finally adding a feature that ive already been using. Makes you wonder how they do that

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago

    I already use profiles in Firefox but this looks a much better interface for managing them.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago*

    Feels super strange to read this. They had profiles for what, decades now? It just required a simple command line flag.

    I mean, this is better, but... Yeah.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago*

    So...... about:profiles is what then ‽‽

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    One thing that I wonder is if I can convert my old firefox -P profiles into this new kind of profiles, and have them all be synced by firefox with a single account instead of recreating them on all my devices. On the filesystem they seem to be the same, just not in the same place.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Their blog implied you would need to create a separate sync account for each profile. It'd obviously be better if you could choose which profiles are linked to which account, in addition to local only.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    i guess you’d need to expose both options: the ability to sync some profiles to some accounts and others to another… for example, i probably wouldn’t want my personal profile to sync to my work devices but id want my work profiles to sync between each other and be accessible from some of my home devices

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    This should have been a feature 10 years ago

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It wasn't. It was a hidden feature.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yes, and also no. Usually, I’d call something a feature if non tech savvy users can use it easily. If it’s hidden behind the command line, most users probably can’t use it. So, to me and colloquially, I wouldn’t call it a feature. Although I get the argument for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    I think containers (that Firefox already has) are a much better way to handle this. Profiles, art least the way they are implemented on chrome, feels like a massive downgrade.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It depends on how much separation you need. If you want different bookmarks, history, or settings per, then I believe you need profiles to make that happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    You can use containers all you want, just don't create another profile and you're golden.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    This is what I do now, just trying to figure out why ff keeps spending time on profiles. Do they have any advantages over containers?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    For highly technical users containers are going to do everything we need.

    For non technical users who need separation, profiles are a standard known framework.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    My non technical spouse prefers profile to separate work and personal. She uses different themes for each profile so it is very obvious which is which.

    Also one of the extensions she likes interferes with a work site she is required to use. She has that extension installed in the personal profile but not work profile.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Different set of cookies, different set of preferences, bookmarks, history, etc. If you need to completely separate two instances, for example one for work and one for everything else, you can only do it with profiles

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    containers are for general browsing; profiles are for the whole browser

    profiles allow you to have different addons installed, different configurations between addons in different profiles, different browser settings (eg a SOCKS proxy for work profile, or a different default search engine, default fonts, etc… or for technical users you can have a profile with experimental settings turned on)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    took em long enough.

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    uhhh, this has been a thing for a long time already. I don't know whats new here. put about:profiles in your url bar for anyone uses a firefox based browser.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (13 children)

    I wish there was a feature like this on YouTube. I'd love a profile for watching educational videos, a profile for feeding me cool videos when I'm high, and a profile for when my kids want to watch stuff. I'm tired of vibing and listening to music videos only to get hit with a language learning podcast or Disney songs.

    It's insane that they have an incognito mode that still serves up ads even though I have premium.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You can create different accounts under different email addresses.

    Once you're logged in, you can switch between accounts from the dropdown menu.

    I've done this in the past to separate French YouTube recs from English ones.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I did this as well but the other accounts get ads because the premium only applies to my first account. Terrible user experience and Google go hand in hand

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Youtube > Profile picture > Settings > Add or manage your channel(s) > create a channel

    You basically get a new "profile" with your own subs, history, profile picture, and comments and premium/channel subscriptions apply to all of them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They do have categories and I've tried to put different channels in different categories, but the thing is just so hard to use I gave up.

    It's quite surprising how bad Google can be at UX.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    It really is wild how a company can be so massive yet unable to do basic UI. I got a notification that someone replied to a YouTube comment I made so I clicked the notification and it opened up YouTube's landing page. I tried to find notifications and couldn't so instead I tried to find a page that has my comment history.

    I had to look it up and apparently you can't even find it on YouTube, you have to go to a separate website, my activity.google.com.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I agree, I would love seperate "recommendation profiles" so like if I am in the mood for music, swap to music, if I want education, I can swap to that, feeling lets play? swap to gaming, horror could be creepypasta or horror games.

    All under the same parent account so the premium status could apply while google would still be able to leech data off the main profile, the only difference is the curated content given is based off the profile.

    edit: HOLY CRAP APPARENTLY THIS EXISTS ALREADY; you just need to make a sub channel under your parent account and the benefits share. I didn't realize recommendations were isolated with that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Uhm ... is this perhaps for the android browser then?

    The desktop browser has had this for a long long time, though in recent builds a bit hidden. I still use various profiles, very handy.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Why would I use this when I have Firefox containers?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's the same as about:profiles

    Just an easy way to separate people's browsing histories, cookes, bookmarks, etc I guess. And you can have them sync independently as well. For if other people want to use the same computer

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I love containers, but it has a pretty frustrating and unfriendly ui. If something else allowed sorting and categorizing, I think that'd be an upgrade.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Fair, I just always felt containers were better than profiles, cause each tab is a profile now. The tooling does need improvement, I still get lost when trying to access some configs for it

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I find multi account containers to be the best workflow ergonomics when it comes to separating logins and sessions. I think having the same bookmarks, theme, etc. is actually nice. But I’m sure many really enjoy profile swapping.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    profiles also allow different addons and addon configurations, default fonts, browser config, etc… it’s kinda like having a whole other user account or a whole other copy of the browser, rather than just cookie and storage isolation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    about:profiles always worked for me. And the profile manager. I don't need a 3rd ui for switching profiles.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The new one is a much better experience. It works like profiles in chrome now. The old one is still there for you to use if you prefer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    It works like profiles in chrome now.

    Is it gonna pop up obnoxiously every time you start the program?

    Is it gonna demand that I create a new profile every time I sign in to Google?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Is it gonna pop up obnoxiously every time you start the program?

    Your choice, there's a checkbox to ask every time or not

    Is it gonna demand that I create a new profile every time I sign in to Google?

    I don't recall anything like that, though I don't recall that in Chrome either.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Ironically, in the article it's pictured running on Windows, which now has a built-in mechanic for automatically screen shotting everything you do and keeping records.

    Yay.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It is a great feature and is the main reason I like Floorp (Firefox fork). But the UX does not look good, I think the way Floorp does is better:

    https://docs.floorp.app/docs/features/how-to-use-workspaces/

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Oh good, the current profile management is a little bit clunky. Having the option to launch random profiles wherever and whenever would be nice.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    tried tab groups, waste of time. trying to save my pinned tabs from disappearing. have to avoid closing single tab windows last. opens on the single tab and pins are lost. keep about 20 pinned in one window.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    pins are attached to the specific window. if you close the windows one by one it trashes them. use the quit function in the menu on the right, that it does not trash the windows, each of them will reopen next timealong with the pins

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Finally! Profile management is easily the worst feature in firefox

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    What do profiles do that I can't do with multi account containers?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I can let my kids play on my computer without them screwing up my personal browser history or getting into any of my accounts without having to teach them how to use yet another extension.

    Vivaldi has a great example of profile management where I can literally create a desktop shortcut for each person that uses my computer, complete with their name, and it's their own separate internet profile.

    Yes, I'm aware I could solve this problem by using multiple user profiles on my computer, but the overhead and the amount of management would also be a massive headache. It is just far easier to do this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Fair, I mostly use my PC alone, so there's no need for separate profiles. Having multi-account containers is a godsend for me. It isolates session data between tabs allowing me to have as many browser sessions as I need in a single browser window.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Zen has "workspaces", which I don't get at all. Profiles seems like too much, containers works fine for me.

    Crazy all the useless nonsense Mozilla has room for, since they helped kill RSS by dropping browser UI support for it for "simplification". It was the same rationale for removing live bookmarks and Shift+Enter to add .net to an address and Ctrl+Shift+Enter for .org.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Finally! That was my biggest gripe when I switched from chrome but I ended up just getting rid of all my profiles, time to set up my old workflows again

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    This features great if you habe two people who use a device. I have it on the steamdeck in my lounge and its nice for people to be able to open Firefox and have all their accounts saved and their extensions

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Until it gets a proper Guest mode like Chrome (which is basically a private window without the shame of using one), the only thing they did is add a cute little interface to an ancient feature.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    have 4 default profiles. on latest, 'Profile: default-release-3'

    about:profiles

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I this a reskin of about:profiles?

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›