all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • 18 comments in c/spacex@sh.itjust.works view that post
    [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    If say that's more of a dynamic fire.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Can't blame snipers this time.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Let's just pretend the V2 ship design never happened.

    Hopefully the ground infrastructure isn't too damaged.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Ever since they got rid of woke the starships just keep blowing up

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Wow. When Ellen Musty said he would decommission the rockets, he really meant it.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You know,

    Last time dingledorf made a mess, there was consequences/investigations by the FAA. Now that this has happened, what are the chances it will be investigated at all or any consequence of dangerous actions?

    I wonder what people will die as a direct result of SpaceX going all Titan Submersible now that they aren't held accountable, because Elon got in there and gutted the FAA.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    there was consequences/investigations by the FAA

    That was a flight test. This was a ground test. Ground testing is not a licensed activity with the FAA, so they have no reason to get involved here. (Per Adrian Beil of NASASpaceflight)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Look at all those beautiful tax payer dollars!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    tax payer dollars

    Not really. SpaceX are paying for these tests. While NASA have agreed to purchase Starship launch services for the Artemis program, they aren't funding each test individually. The Starship contract for Artemis is fixed-price, not cost-plus. Whether SpaceX blow up one Starship or ten during the testing phase, NASA pay the same amount for the operational flights.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 13 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Yeah it did. Wowsers!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    The headline in the news banner just had impeccable comedic timing: "First next-gen superheavy possibly under construction" a few seconds after the rocket exploded

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Holy fuck. When was this? The last time something like this happened at Starbase was before the integrated flight tests started. With this, plus the recent suborbital Starship failures, it's really not looking great for the program.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    That's a glorious boom

    But that's why they do testing, it's cheaper to boom on testbed than on a launch pad or in the air

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    But the idea behind doing things with the risk of them going boom is to learn things. I'm not sure they're learning what they need if they're going from testing Starship in launches to going back to static firing. If the idea is to rework the engines for Starship, I have to wonder if that's a fundamental enough step to put the entire project back to pretty much square one.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Could you possibly whitewash this any harder?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    I don't think that means whet you think it means.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Agreed. "Spin" would be the better word.

    It's another embarrassment added to a long list of embarrassments at this point. SpaceX has utterly failed to deliver on its contracts and at some point people need to recognize that the private sector does not always do it better. Especially when the company is run by a conman.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    What do you think whitewash means?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 2 comments in c/usa@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I guess this falls under “rapid unscheduled disassembly”

  • source
  • [+] -11 points 1 year ago

    Rocket explode..all go noooo, hope anybody got injured.

    Elmo's rocket explode..all go yeaaaaahhhhh!!!!!!Awesome! Hope anybody got injured working for that c**t.

  • source