Incidentally, here's some kids presenting an unofficial Starbase Louisiana Update .
I'd guess a huge number of sites in Australia might be suitable for SSO?
But also, there are parts of Australia less than 11 degrees south of the equator, so perhaps SpaceX were considering taking advantage of that, with a site that is also great for eastbound launches?
Official Rendezvous and Docking video.
From 1:25:25 to 1:25:48 something flies from the bottom left corner to the top middle. Is that Dragon still shedding ice?
From 1:27:57 to 1:28:28, the popup in the bottom right implies we are getting a Windows screen-share from space!
Other relevant comments:
- "The cause of the engine out, I think was basically a failure in the ... engine computer software." It didn't seem to be present in any of the other engine computers.
- "The heat shield is looking robust."
- That engine "glitch doesn't seem to be too much of an issue"
- Not many changes between flights 14 and 15 "but some of them take a fair bit of work and we've got to go inside the tank"
Ah, that's probably what he had in mind. But really it's more like the opposite. It seems like SpaceX is causing chaos by abandoning their captive market.
(Unless the term is also used to refer to the relationship between adjacent layers in a vertically integrated company.)
Pedantic semantic point ...
"I can tell you SpaceX has already gone captive because we have a whole bunch of customers coming to us and saying, oh my God, can you fly us?" Ranzo said during the company’s 10 September earnings call.
I'm not aware of "gone captive" really meaning anything, at least in British English. The best I've found is that, pertaining to animals, it could be roughly synonymous with 'domesticated'. E.g. tortoises
They should be able to perform propellant transfer tests with the current ships
Interesting, thanks. Now that you mention it, I do think I've seen some potential refilling hardware (probe-and-drogue?) on recent Starships. Presumably that's just for the sake of testing and would not form part of an ongoing pez dispenser variant in the long term?
Back-to-back launches from the same pad, or one launch from each?
Well it does seem like they want LC-39A to be ready soon (potentially soon enough to launch Flight 16), so my guess is that they might as well go with the two-state solution (Texas & Florida).
It’s rare, but astronauts have been off the planet for their child’s birth before.
This got me wondering whether any space agencies make crew assignments for women conditional upon agreeing to a contraception regime, and require pregnancy tests before launch. And whether any of that would even be legal in North America or Europe.
SpaceX has nine more Crew Dragon flights in its backlog, including three additional crew missions to the ISS that NASA recently secured in a $946 million contract extension
Seems like a 'nice little earner'. I can understand that SpaceX might want to retire Falcon 9 ASAP, so that Starship can take over all the launch pads and other launch site infrastructure. But this got me wondering whether Dragon could go on top of a Frankenstein version of Starship! Probably too much hassle ...
So, how much is known about the upcoming ship serial numbers, with regards to what variants they will be?
I'm assuming S42 will definintely be the pez dispenser variant? (And I'm very tempted to assume it'll be loaded with 42 Starlink sats!)
But what about 43? 44? At some point they need to start their propellant transfer tests.
NSF's Alex opined on this 10 hours ago, from 08:53 to 08:56 CDT.
Ship Forte now has Ship Forty https://youtu.be/GTIaZaDn-84
If they send the ship to orbit, I wonder where they'll de-orbit it, given that it won't be RTLS. Perhaps:
- in their 'usual' place for soft splashdowns, west of Australia
- in the Gulf of Mexico
- Pacific, west of California
- Pacific, the cemetery
- near the planned path of Forte, timed so that she can just pick up Ship 41 the day after its splashdown. Strap it alongside Ship 40, and take them both to SpaceX at the same time.
P.S. The sidebar links here but I can't access that. Would this be better? (I'm not very familiar with the technology or etiquette of Lemmy.)
NASA's "Space to Ground" videos are nice. (All 573 of them!)
But Varda takes the concept of a 'space to ground video' a little more literally. And I love them for it!
If SpaceX eats their core business, I hope they pivot to just sending cameras on all sorts of exciting journeys around the solar system!