It sounds like they're contradicting themselves in the mail they sent:

Previously we said we wouldn’t use your inputs, data, outputs, or suggestions to train AI models. This is still the case, unless you explicitly allow us to do so

(emphasis not mine)

The word explicit doesn't IMO cover anything but informed opt-in, not opt-out of any kind.

It's genuinely impressive how the whole ecosystem of proprietary software is speedrunning enshittification at an unprecedented rate. The net is tightening, and the only escape is FOSS.

I'm still running v2023.1 because that's the last version before they stuffed so much AI into it that my CPU screams constantly while running it. The writing is on the wall with those guys.

I feel there will be big JetBrains leak with all the stolen code they say it's secured with restricted access.

this is why i stil use sublime text. it edits code with none of the bloat.

What frustrates me most is that jetbrains had a winning formula

They made, imo, the best ide's, striking the balance between intuitive and useful without drifting too far into bloat

I just don't vibe with jetbrains wanting access to my code and data and how i use the ide itself - imagine if your hammer took a picture every time it was swung while tracking the swing trajectory and force and sent it to a thousand unknown people

its just fucking weird and its fucking weird that jetbrains presses this onto us - even as an opt-in its wierd

Even at it most innocent, and not the reality of trying to build the tool that ousts us out of our trade and craft, i still dont want some code cuck sitting in the corner of my periphery hyperventilating on every keystroke and variable name i make