"What if it shows up in court to fight the ticket, Darryl? What then?"

"Oh geez, I don't know. Don't even think about it."

all 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 26 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Tow it and only release it to an executive of the company who shows up to the yard and personally signs off on the fact that they allowed it to happen.

Start a paper trail of execs you can sue when one of these illegal u-turns hurts or kills someone.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    Surely it can't be that complex. The ticket goes to the register owner if no driver is present.
    Just like a parking ticket.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Parking tickets are civil violations, speeding tickets are criminal. Two totally different systems. Police don't typically hand out parking tickets either

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    They don’t do that with speeding tickets, why would that apply here?

    Moving violations are different than parking. It’s why it’s usually different agencies who do them, and parking don’t carry guns.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    So automatic speed cameras know who is driving the car to issue the fine to the correct person?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    They can’t prove who’s driving, so who gets the demerits? So in the US, those get thrown out all the time.

    In Canada, no demerits, goes to the registered owner, they can fight their friends for lending it out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    BC has a points system that effects your insurance premiums if you collect so many in a year period. Tickets get sent via mail and charges to owner, if it was camera feed capture

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    But its the software driving the car thats at fault. Clearly need to ticket the AI company

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Right. Also, flat rate ticketing is regressive, since it impacts poor people far more than rich people. So the ticket should be scaled to match the total combined income of all shareholders in the company.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    You'd think police would know how to impound a car. I've seen tow-trucks do it to unoccupied cars frequently enough.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    If there is no driver to ticket for driving in a dangerous or otherwise illegal manner, then impound the vehicle and the owner can pay the fine when they retrieve it from the impound yard.

    It's what would happen if a driver fled the scene of a normal traffic stop.

  • source
  • 106 comments in c/nottheonion@lemmy.world view that post
    6 comments in c/avs@futurology.today view that post
    3 comments in c/world view that post