Breaking news: in act of gross defiance, student reads book

knowledge is knowing Frankenstein is the doctor, wisdom is knowing Frankenstein is the monster

These damn college educated liberals and their basic reading comprehension

You can be a victim and still be a monster.

Was it cruel for Frankenstein to bring this tortured being into life? Yes.

Is the creature a victim then? Yes.

Does the creature purposefully harm and kill others (and also try to force Frankenstein into making another tortured being because he wants her to be ugly and face the same torment as him so she’ll have to be with him; showing that he is just as if not more willing to commit the same horror as the Dr. just to feel slightly less alone)? Yes.

Does that make him a monster? Yes.

I mean seriously guys he’s still a fucking monster.

The doctor crossed a line and did something monstrous, but he didn’t know how bad it would be. The creature, however, knows exactly how bad it is, and still wants to do commit the sin again because—by incel-esque logic—this new cursed being will have to love him. If you’re willing to knowingly subject another person to indefinite torture just to feel slightly better yourself, you might be a monster.

Serial killers often had bad childhoods, but that doesn’t excuse their monstrous actions. Frankenstein’s creature had a rough life, but he’s still a monster.

Shelley was woke as fuck. Daughter of two woke ass motherfuckers and marries Lord Poet Snokeflake.

In the UK, The Sun newspaper targets those blessed with the gift of not having to worry about having their own thoughts. It is infamously a standout vile paper. They continued having a full page different topless girl on page 3 for decades. Throughout they routinely describe black, brown, Muslim, LGBTQ+ in derogatory ways. Charlie Kirk would have promoted them.

Nick Groom, external, a professor of English literature at the University of Exeter, who has written a new introduction to mark the novel's 200th anniversary since publication.

“It’s interesting when I teach the book now, students are very sentimental towards the being,” Professor Groom wrote.

“There’s been a gradual shift... for years Victor Frankenstein’s creation was known as the Monster, then critics seemed to identify him as a victim and called him the Creature. That fits more with students’ sensibilities today.”

Bunch of speculation as to the headline being serious. We can read the article instead of guessing.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/5732932/snowflake-students-dub-frakenstein-misunderstood-victim/

On one hand, Frankenstein's monster was a victim, but on the other, he was also a giant piece of shit.

Engaging with the slop by making a post about it is also succumbing to the clickbait, unfortunately.

The sun is just another garbage tabloid that gets plastered on the internet.

What's funny about this? He WAS a victim. He was the creation of pride and hubris. Only shallow judgement made him a "monster"

So far, there have been no comments on the parallels between Frankenstein and his creature and the Christian god and theirs. I think many people also assume the word creature has a negative connotation, but I would not be surprised if that stemmed from the effect this book had on society, and its use was mostly literal.

the sun makes the new york post look good, and that's an insult

And then there's this dude...

Remember, those people don't read. If they can read at all.

They have been taught that by their woke teachers around the world for more than a century, imagine that!