all 23 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 118 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The AI being hyped right now is not AI at all. It’s really important that we all acknowledge this, that the world is selling itself a multi-billion-dollar lemon: predictive text engines that have nothing intelligent about them. They’re giant sorting machines, which is why they’re so good at identifying patterns in scientific research, and could genuinely advance medicine in wonderful ways. But what they cannot do is think, and as such, it’s a collective mass-delusion that these systems have any use in our day-to-day lives beyond plagiarism.

Goddamn, a gaming outlet saying what the serious grown-up press should have been saying from the start!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I'm an old fart - I got my degree in CS in 1985, and I've been paying attention to the predictions and advancements in AI for a very long time. I have at least as much issue with the way people think and talk about it as the author, but probably less of an issue with it being called AI. Remember that for decades, the informal working definition of AI was "A computer doing anything that usually requires a human." So for ages, they said we'd have AI if a computer could read a page of printed text out loud in English. That seemed almost unattainable when it was first talked about, but now it's so trivial that no one would consider it AI.

    People have tried to make definitions that are crisper than that, but few if any of those definitions requires anything we'd call "thinking." The frustrating thing is that the general public talks all the time about AI as if it's conscious . Even when we're talking about its flaws, we use words like "hallucinating," which is something only thinking beings can do.

    To me, LLMs are the worst things because to so many people they seem like the are (or could be) thinking entities. They respond to questions in a lifelike manner and can construct (extrapolate?) somewhat novel responses. But they're also the least useful to us as a society. I'm much more interested in the Machine Learning applications for distilling gobs of data to develop new medicines or identify critical items in images that humans don't have the mental bandwidth for. But LLMs get all the press.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    No arguments to what you wrote.

    I'd add that llms are increasingly the only way I can find useful technical information on anything anymore.

    Of course this is solving a problem that shouldn't fucking exist in the first place, and I still need to take that information back to a search engine to verify it and do actual research, which may be the point.

    ......

    Search is so. Fucking. Broken.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    I honestly never look at the AI results because they're so flawed so often. I don't have an awful lot of problems finding answers to things with a standard search and then scrolling past any sources that are often crap. Worth noting, by the way, that search results, especially Google's, were way more accurate several years ago, before there were so many sponsored results and they had agendas to push. So technologically, it's a fixable situation, it's just the enshitificaiton problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Not that I'm taking a dig, but what are you looking for that only Ai can find it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's less about only being able to find it with ai but more about being able nail down definitions and understand the relationships between concepts well enough to know what to actually search for online.

    This applies to anything remotely technical. Search results produce hot fucking garbage and the only way to find what you're looking for these days is to know exactly what you're looking for before you search. And even then it's a crapshoot whether you'll surface anything useful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago

    “Yeah, let’s try it. [Korean-style steak sauce is] not something I’ve made before,” says Mancuso, remembering his script, “so I could definitely use the help.”

    Then at the end of the article they embed an Instagram video from 2023 of Mancuso making a Korean-style steak sauce. *chef’s kiss*

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago

    Try not to imagine what the money he's blown on AI could have been spent on that would actually benefit mankind.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Enjoyed this? Also watch Mark trying and failing to answer a video call on the thing.

    All in all, it's a shame.
    The 'texting' demo they did with Mark writing a text message via "pen motions" was pretty neat.
    It feels like Google's "GLASS" vision finally coming to fruition, problem is, we're not in 2013 anymore.
    A product like this demands high trust in the company behind it to work and Google, Facebook, etc, have evaporated any trust I had in them.
    It's a sad state of affairs, a product like this felt like the future back then. It used to be so exciting, nowadays I can't be excited for this stuff anymore... 👎

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    Why they clapping, and laughing. Fuck Zuck doesn't test these things before hand? All those billionaires of dollars and it makes a fool of himself. What fucking moron. Well like Ron White said, Can't fix stupid.

    How the fuck this dumbass get so rich?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Hey guys! Want a way to do everything you can do on your cell phone but 100 times worse and more expensive? Well check out this piece of shit!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    lol, this reminded me of the MS surface parody. "Instead of using one of today's more popular compact devices to get directions to where you're going, why not use a device the size of a small car to do the same job?"

    https://youtu.be/CZrr7AZ9nCY

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    It always seems weird to me that they didn’t market it for its true potential, as a D&D and board game medium.

    I built one myself with diffusive plastic, a short throw projector, and a PS3 camera, and it ruled.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago
    [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Do these guys even know how to do a rigged demo?

    Also, in case you'd rather just see:

    https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:p7ffxkcsq2xwt3t2mbk52puc/post/3lz344mxmb22a

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I've had my share of botched tech demos, so I can empathize. Steve Jobs, during an early iPhone demo legitimately blamed the Moscone Center wifi (I was there).

    But this was just bad demo planning at every level. I'm sorry, but I couldn't stop laughing.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    His demo got demoed?

  • source
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Wow, that's a terribly written article, or whatever type of text this is pretending to be.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • 12 comments in c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 24 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    So the takeaway from this is invest in a company that promises better WiFi?

    I'm confused. I know "Facebook AI who should I give my money to?"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I wonder how many people Zuck yelled at later that day?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Oh, it could have gone worse. It didn't burst into flames.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Move fast and break things. No fix, just break.

    Moron.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Oh this shit makes me so fucking happy. I can't stop laughing at this. https://youtu.be/I5_JrfvO4G8

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Hahaha, heeheee, guffaw even.

    What a total bonehead.

    I bet they did not even do a test run.

    Did no one tell them to pickup the phone receiver and yell into to get the modem going again? Oh ya it was the “wifi”.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Honestly, the "test run" thing is my first response too. One of the biggest names in tech doing a super hyped demo live and they didn't even do a dry run?

    Or maybe they did do a dry run, and it worked, but because of AI variability it didn't work this time. Which is even funnier.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    They couldn't because the whole point of AI is ability to reason. They rehearsed EVERYTHING they could without giving the impression the AI bit was also fake. And of course, that's the part that fail because the AI these assholes are selling to morons is a scam.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I think that's why there was the awkward dialog at the beginning and all the obvious labels. They were supposed to ask the AI to identify a recipe that could be made with these ingredients - an actually meaningful use for the setup they have there. But they couldn't get the linguistic slot machine to cooperate, so they tried to force in the context.

  • source
  • parent