No, no, that can't be right. Randy said the game was super optimal. 🤔
post
Gearbox has also issued a piece of advice to PC gamers that to me reads like an effort to prevent players from making knee-jerk reactions to the game's performance as soon as they’ve changed their settings: “Please note that any time you change any of your graphics settings, your shaders will need to recompile. Please keep playing for at least 15 minutes to see how your PC's performance has changed.”
Pretty sure if that's really happening, it's a unique problem
Maybe if you're changing just resolution, but for 99% of setting changes it has nothing to do with shaders.
What? Randy Bitchfork is devaluing the premium performance of his premium game so it'll run on dirty plebeian computers with their plebeian GTX 4080 graphics card and i9-12900 processors? faints
People complain about performance and then complain about a patch. I’m starting to think social media only cares about outrage.
But I already started making my own game engine!
All he had to say was "we are working on it, in the meantime, use some frame gen, or bump your res down. Our bad". But no, he had to be a dick about it.
I thought this was a “premium” game. Why should they optimize for the poors? /s
I really wish Randy would shut the fuck up, because it seems like the actual devs really care about this game.
People who spend every waking moment working on something end up caring about it. Being a game dev in the AAA industry is brutal. You only do it if you really like working on games. The pay sucks, the hours suck, and the benefits suck.
The only thing you really get to keep is the pride in your work when the game is released.
It's clear Randy did fuckall with this game, because he lacks any pride in what his devs have accomplished.
I just spent 5000€ on a new rig to join the premium gearbox gamer society and now this?
It’s so funny that this was their mindset when it doesn’t run well on my PC which cost close to $2,000.
Randy is so out of touch he thinks people with $2,000 available in discretionary spend are “the poors”.
I think they do think that though. Companies seem to have realized they can make more money with less sales by pricing the lowest bidding consumer group out of the market.
Okay, but the people playing on 5090s aren't interested in barely getting 60 fps.
There's no amount of hardware that shitty software can't piss down the drain.
Performance 'Our Top Priority,' Gearbox Says
Really? I thought we were to either suck it up or move on... I moved on
…but I thought performance was fine, why would something fine be their top priority? Pitchford couldn’t possibly have been talking out of his ass, could he?
Eh, I don't think the series would be as bad if it didn't have his coke-addled ass dictating which direction it should go.
what decisions has he been responsible for?
The movie.
Oh I forgot there was a movie
What now it's a priority? What about Pitchfords snobbish comments? Did their bottom line hurt?
Most people I know who are keen on the game are completely unaware of any of the the discourse surrounding it. It was probably minimal.
Something I've kinda come to accept about Gearbox is that Pitchford is an ass and sometimes they farm out products when they shouldn't (ACM bring the biggest example), but most of the devs actually working on the games really do care about the product and want it to be good.
That means they're removing Denuvo & Symbiote right? Right???
It's not just stutters but also just general poor performance in the open world, such that I get about half the frame rate I would expect to see on high settings without frame gen. I wouldn't be surprised if the optimizations here are like what happened with Assassin's Creed: Unity where there was a bunch of detail that got sanded off of the world map in places that a player should never actually see it anyway.
all 14 comments