top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 178 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Fucking bitch ass move by a bitch ass corporation capitulating to a bitch ass administration.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    The decision by Nexstar comes as the broadcast station is seeking FCC approval for its $6.2 billion mega deal to acquire Tegna, a deal that would make Nexstar by far the largest owner of local TV stations in the country.

    The FCC would have to raise the 40 percent ownership cap in order to let the deal advance.

    Quote from The Hollywood Reporter. Just like CBS with Colbert.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 98 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 87 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The three letter news channels are not to be trusted anymore.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    🌎 👨‍🚀 🔫 👩‍🚀

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I’d argue you could’ve trusted them MORE before the Fairness Doctrine was murdered. Certainly still needed to apply skepticism and discernment though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I’d argue you could’ve trusted them MORE before the Fairness Doctrine was murdered

    Red Scare politics would suggest they've always been untrustworthy. "Fairness" Doctrine only ever included two liberalized perspectives. Meet The Press wasn't bringing on Michael Parenti and Murray Bookchin to debate David Duke and Ayn Rand.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 83 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    This is why the fediverse matters. Kimmel or Colbert, right now they can turn to platforms like YT and will still be able to get the voice out.

    But guess what. The same corporatism that control ABC control google. You live on their platforms your message is dependent on their approval.

    The future is free; the future is federated.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] [S] 52 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    As an immediate illustration to your point apparently Reddit politics has apparently been removing this story left and right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Out of curiosity, I went and checked the front page of r/all. Of the current top 25 posts, these are the ones which pertain to the Kimmel situation followed by their respective subreddit:

    /1. news /2. askreddit /3. cringetiktoks /7. technology /9. nofilternews /10. politics /13. fauxmoi /14. facepalm /18. whitepeopletwitter /23. popculturechat

    The post on r/politics pertains to before the show was pulled, but it was posted after it was officially pulled. Some subreddits do delete repeat posts that are about the same story to keep the discussion all in one thread, so maybe that has happened with that subreddit?

    [Edit: added slashes to prevent auto-formatting from changing the numbers]

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 4 points 1 year ago

    I’ll try to find the one I navigated to but they kept getting closed for being “off topic”.

    Also I’d argue the FCC making a threat and ABC actually pulling the guy are 2 separate stories.

    I don’t think it’s some Reddit wide cabal as much as R/Politics sucking

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 187 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (32 children)

    So they've now gotten rid of Colbert and Kimmel, 2 of the most brutally honest guys going after trump. Interesting.

    Video of monologue: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-j3YdxNSzTk

  • source
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 98 points 1 year ago (12 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    And all the cocksuckers in the comment section saying "fwee speech has conseqwences uwu" deserve to be duct taped into a porta potty and set ablaze.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago* (9 children)

    Y'all should have known better than to say something so trite and fascism adjacent.

    That you're surprised it's being weaponized against you in turn is goddamn laughable, but you wanted your dumb little slogan that tried to explain a complex topic as stupidly as possible.

    Like just think for one goddamn second about how fascists are going to use the literal fucking meaning of your phrase.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    What is "my phrase" of which you speak?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Think

    For

    One

    Goddamn

    Second

    Before

    You

    Talk

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Maybe you should try fucking thinking about the context of this conversation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Or, and this is obviously a deep ask here, you could explain what the fuck you're on about.

    Explain yourself, or fuck off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Read your original comment to see what phrase I could possibly be referring to.

    It's not that hard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • No. I failed Mind Reading at Hogwarts; I'm not picking thru anything in an attempt to interpret whatever your issue was. Come on out like a big kid. Explain your issue. I shall engage further if you can explain where you're coming from.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 67 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    Sooo... I'm guessing the complaints are coming from people who didn't watch it? Because I can't put my finger on anything that was horrible or false or anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] -23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

    his mocking of Trump's grieving of that dude's death was low and distasteful regardless, to say the least.

    Edit (and keep downvoting me if you want):

    Trump is a narcissistic psycopath who is incapbable of symapthy that's why he is expressing his grief through emotionless shock. This is the way all psycopaths sincerely express their condolences. It does not mean you make fun of them or make fun of death of someone who is already dead.

    Charlie Kirk is meeting up with god in front of all the maimed kids of Gaza which he advocated for their slaughter and genocide. He deserves that and it's ironic how he was killed and the world is better without him.

    I want to say a million thing but I can't bring myself to make fun of his death or make fun of the grieving of his supporters or family. That is not in me regardless of how much I disagree, hate and wish harm upon these people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Trump isn't grieving Trump didn't know who the fuck he was. His team is using it for political reasons. In what religion would Charlie be in Heaven? Ah yes the American Christian religion which doesn't listen to anything in the Bible.

  • source
  • parent
  • But I mean, he didn't even compare Kirk's neck to fountain of Kool Aid, or make fun of the look on his face, mention how he was just about to lie yet again about gun violence before he died by gun violence, or anything.

    And it's clear you didn't even watch this anyway if you mention Trump grieving.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I've been saying that the billionaires and oligarchs — who own the majority of the S&P500 and political class — WANT fascism for the last 2 decades. They are behind it's political resurgence, globally; most have already publicly stated things that prove they are authoritarian sociopaths (Musk, Thiel, the Koch's, Ellison, Zuck, etc).

    This explains why Trump has never seen the invite or a prison cell, despite 100 clear as day felonies, why the Dem establishment has never done more than performative resistance, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They always do. When capitalism starts to falter and the public opinion starts to turn on the system the ownership class goes right to fascism to crush the population.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [+] 48 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago

    They're just getting started. Colbert was fired as a demand to allow the sale of CBS' to Larry Ellison, 2nd richest man, and a vicious MAGA. With Colbert out, the decks were cleared for the sale.

    CBS used to have the reputation of being the gold standard of broadcast news. Now it's just going to be one more mouthpiece in the Conservative Propaganda Machine.

  • source
  • [–] 75 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Fascism, folks. Time to resist

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • Okay, I bet Charlie will be off the air for longer though.

  • source
  • [–] 70 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Even this framing is dishonest - he didn't make comments about Charlie Kirk, he was mocking MAGA for rushing to weaponize his death. ABC shut down his show for a valid criticism of MAGA.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Elon musk, noted free speech absolutist, falls to his knees

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    "Why can't we put all the people that disagree with our speech in jail? Why?!"

    Free speech absolutist means they want to be able to say the horrible things they believe out loud so they can encourage others to act on those beliefs. At the same time, they believe its their "right" to continue to hold everyone in their life hostage and force them to tolerate their lies and hate speech.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 66 points 1 year ago* (13 children)
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Why were universities letting this shit bag talk to their students?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Because they are institutions that are trying to provide comprehensive discussion since the world is grey. We don’t have to like it, but that’s probably why they allow it. Plus, yes, they make money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    While they're at it, they should have an astrologist come debate the statistics professor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    "I understand your point, well ok, I don't really understand it, but that doesn't matter. Mercury is in retrograde so that explains everything. No need to bring numbers into this, unless we're consulting numerology, then we need them of course."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Canceled my D+ and Hulu subscriptions and wrote in other:

    “Capitulating to Trump’s version of fascist America and knee jerk reaction to Kimmel made me rethink why I should give you my money. I don’t even like or watch Kimmel, but you are allowing free speech to be violated. I don’t support free speech abolitionists.“

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I cancelled mine too. Clicked other but don't remember seeing a place to comment. Missed opportunity. Well done you, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Dear USA, fight for your rights. What's happening now reminds me of what happened to Baseem Youssef in Egypt: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-27671642

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    ABC confirmed fascist propaganda network. Good to know.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    He barely even remarked on it. He said nothing about Kirk himself.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I didn't know ABC could bend over.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I didn't know ABC still existed, or that Kimmel was on them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    Okay I know we're all pretty deep into the nerdweb here, but let's not lose the thread of reality here. ABC still pulls close to 5 million individual viewers every night, JUST on broadcast and cable rebroadcast. That ain't fuckin nothing; TV is still an important and influential medium.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›