top 35 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 112 points 1 year ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 55 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Damn, this developer is really hell bent on pissing off its fanbase, isn't it?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 75 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I quite like the singleplayer mod. Also the devs apparently support the russian invasion of Ukraine, so don't give them your money anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago*

    Fuck that Russian company! time to install the single player tarkov mod just because the devs don’t like it.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    Good thing I'll never be playing escape from tarkov again, otherwise I might be bothered

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago

    And not a single person was surprised

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    I regret buying it the first time.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Looked for a Tarkov alternative with pve option (because I don't need any more sodium in my diet) and found gray zone warfare. It's a pre alpha and is in a pretty playable state, plus it's an entire open world which is fantastic.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I played that but it was too sim for me, seems like fun if you want an unforgiving game.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    What? Tarkov is well known for how it coddles the player base and hand holds newbies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    The only thing Tarkov coddles is its developer Nikita. I know of numerous people who've tried it and said it's just TOO complex. I've played Gray Zone, and it's nowhere near as difficult and fully of bullshit as EFT.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 27 points 1 year ago

    They are just doing this to cash out, it costs them nothing to provide a Steam key.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    huh, I was interested in picking this up

    Guess not

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    I haven't read the article, but just going off the title, if that's accurate: isn't that how it'd be for any game? I'm not defending it but the only platform I've seen devs give Steam keys to players for ownership on has been on itch.io.

    People don't suddenly get rewarded cross-platform ownership just because they bought it on one platform. Same with Unrailed, had it come out on Switch first and Steam later, etc.; they must re-buy if they want it on Steam. Same with Slay the Spire: existing Steam owners don't suddenly gain Android access just because it released on Droid, etc.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    The system is still “PC” in this case, even if technically the platform is different. And since you have to log into your account with their service, they can easily confirm that you own the game.

    I don’t have to create an account to play Slay the Spire on Android.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The title is accurate, and I agree with you; there is no need for an outrage. I don't know a single game that would give free keys for another platform. It would be cool, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Was the same for ESO, if you bought it before it made its way to steam you would have to buy it again through steam if you want to play it through steam.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Doesn't mean it isn't scummy. In today's day and age, where you can link every platform with every other platform, they could have integrated their existing account system with Steam and make the game available to people that already own the game.

    But there is more money to squeeze out of their playerbase.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Play xonotic instead.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Why wouldn’t it?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    No. They don't "have to". Wake up, fellow poors. Stop giving your money away. If "buying" doesn't equal "ownership", et al...

  • source