For over a century, the automobile has represented freedom, power, and the thrill of mechanical mastery. The connection between driver, machine, and road defined what it meant to own and love a car. But in today’s digital era, a different trend is unfolding. Cars are no longer just machines designed to take us from point A to point B. Increasingly, they resemble something else entirely: smartphones on wheels.

top 97 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 89 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's nothing less than a war against property rights.

They are pushing software into cars because they see copyright, and more specifically the DMCA anti-circumvention clause, as an excuse to retain their control over your property after they sell it to you. Rentiership is 100% of their goal, and providing useful functionality is nothing but an afterthought at best.

"Subscriptions" to hardware you already own is entirely FRAUD and executives of companies that engage in it deserve long prison sentences.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yes, and car manufacturers are becoming SaaS vendors

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    The sad thing is 'smartphone on wheels' is a slur.

    Smartphones don't have to be soulless and uniform and enshittified and subscription based and completely inaccessible and straight up anti-consumer/designed to fail, but here we are.


    I really hope Slate takes off though (and they make a nimble hatchback for their next chassis). It feels like the antithesis of all this.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The simplicity of the Slate interior is fantastic. They developed a screenless touch screen that you can rotate without even looking at them. I wish I were in the market for this type of vehicle.

    Interior photo

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Kind of disappointing Bezos is involved though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago

    Cars have been giant smartphones {tracking and data collection gold mines} for years now

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    aand this is why I won't buy a car made after 2010.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    IMO cars peaked around 2015

    Interiors looked really nice and you had analog dials etc. Wish some small screens, just enough.

    Today it's just big plastic dashboard with cheap tablets stuck in them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The analog dials were an illusion. That information has been processed digitally for at least the last 25 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    I had a base model around that time frame. Good safety ratings for its time but the car isn't integrated with the touchscreen so while it's already a dumb-car, I could make it even more simple by tearing out the radio and installing one without a screen. Makes me happy to know I'm not obligated to fix it if the radio breaks because I drive maybe 30-40 miles a week and would rather keep my money than shell out for all the gimmicks.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Eh, my early 9th gen civic is nice, though I think they ruined it only like coupla years later with cell radios.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    This is why I ordered a Slate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (15 children)

    Imagine a car without cellular connectivity

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Archive link to an FAQ for the Slate electric trucklette that claims no sim cards and minimum digital bits. No clue if it will be a good vehicle so don't take this as an endorsement. https://archive.ph/PMKpC

    Anyone know other options?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Find a car that fits your needs and then pull the fuse powering the sim card before it leaves the lot. If it breaks, put the fuse back and don't buy it.

    My 2019 corolla lost the right speaker and mic access when I did that. I fixed the right speaker by crossing some wires, and the mic hasn't really been needed enough for me to dig deeper to fix it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You mean, like the car that I drive currently? It’s pretty tough to picture, honestly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Have they ever made an electric car that didn't have that fucking SHIT ?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    You can convert an older car to electric. As basic as it gets but with a new mode of power

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    When I ask car people about that they say (basically) "no, it won't fit".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Yes, there can be challenges about where to put the batteries, and some vehicles are certainly easier than others. But that hasn't stopped a LOT of people from doing it anyways.

    30 seconds of internet searching will show plenty of retrofits. One guy retrofitted a 1980s Delorean with a Chevy Bolt electric powertrain, and now it accelerates twice as fast as it ever did with gasoline.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Sadly yes and they’re mainly taking the worst aspects. Normal built in features like heated seats as subscriptions, dropping smartphone integration for their own far inferior dogshit UI and features, and so on.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Volkswagen is so bad at this! They have phone connectivity but they bog down the infotainment with they're own crap software. The GPS is so bad it slowes down the whole system. I will never use vw maps. Ever. Just stop!

    And Chevy just doesn't have android auto on or apple play on their lower trim levels. But they do compensate by integrating Google maps at least.

    Kia is the best though. Minimal proprietary software. Plug your phone in and android auto automatically comes up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    the automobile has represented freedom

    That's a part I never understood.

    Cara are fucking expensive, they're literally money drains. Unless you have that much money, you ainns having a car.

    In Europe, bot having a car generally nis perfectly fine, you still can go everywhere easily as that place hasn't been turned into a cars-only paradise

    In the US, and countries that modelled themselves after it, you're not going anywhere without a car. Public transit it shit at best and in many places completely absent. Want to try a bicycle? Good luck, you gotta mix in with the murder cars.

    Cars do not represent freedom, they're the opposite

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    In Europe, not having a car generally is perfectly fine

    In cities.

    For those living in the countryside, not really, as distances are huge and public transport is rare (think a single bus that stops at a bus station a km or two away and passes maybe once every 2h) or non-existent.

    That said, over 70% of people in Europe live in urban areas.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Compared to walking or riding a horse they are freedom. They cost a lot, but also enable a lot.

    i wish we had transit here, but that doesn't mean cars are not freedom. Even in europe most people drive.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Ads between gear changes in 3…2…1…

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 27 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Yes it’s why China was able to leapfrog and become a EV manufacturing giant. They were never able to compete in the traditional ICE vehicle market with the Europeans, Japanese and Americans. Since building an internal combustion engine that complies with the regulation, is fuel efficient and fast is really difficult for them since they lack the century of experience that the other manufacturers have. An electric engine is much less complex and since China has decades of experience building batteries, electronics and software, because they make the smartphones for almost every smartphone brand in the world, they were able to set up shop and catch up to foreign competitors very quickly in the EV market.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Since building an internal combustion engine that complies with the regulation, is fuel efficient and fast is really difficult for them since they lack the century of experience that the other manufacturers have.

    My 2c:

    You're right they are going to become the EV king, but its not because they lack experience making ICE engines. Chinese vehicles with ICE engines are being sold on the European market and have been sold there for a while now. They weren't able to out compete other manufacturers on the EU market because other brands have been well established and their lower prices were not significant enough. What I mean is: you aren't going to disrupt a well established and saturated market with the same product.

    The shift to EV presented an opportunity of equal ground on the EU market, in fact on worldwide markets. Domestic makers were not fast enough to adapt and so Tesla was able to gain a significant portion at the start. Other makers caught up soon but weren't able to offer EV cars for the same prices as they traditionally did ICE cars. Now you have an unsaturated market with highly priced products. Chinese companies can exploit that. They don't even have to disrupt any markets, they just need to enter them. Demand is there, supply is lackluster.

    Its also an opportunity for new companies to start up and start picking at the old guard of 50+ year old car manufacturers. This is where you're right. New companies don't need to develop an ICE because its complex and difficult, making an EV is easier. Its just ironic the old car companies weren't able to adapt. Was it their old ways? Bureaucracy? Oil investments? I don't know.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I don't think that's the reason. China makes tons of aftermarket replacement parts and even OEM parts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    They've been. Demand your privacy back

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (14 children)

    I don't currently drive since I live in a city with great public transit but if i was forced to get a car it wouldn't be made after 2006. I like buttons and don't want to spend $400 replacing my rear view mirror because its linked to my touch screen for no damn reason

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    But you will spend 1500 bucks replacing everything else on the car.

    Also cars have plenty of buttons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    $1500 put into a 2003 Honda Accord is COMPLETELY different than putting that into a 2016.

    And I want ALL buttons. No touch screen AT All

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    1500 put into a 2003 Honda Accord is COMPLETELY different than putting that into a 2016.

    Yeah you will do it every six months.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    I guess you have never dealt with the bullshit hassle of a 20 year old car…

    Why are you living in a dream world?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Old cars are work for sure, but if you are willing to learn it's not bad.

    I have a 2007 Mustang. I've replaced the entire front suspension, rear differential, alternator, and paid an upholsterer to replace the convertible top. I upgraded the radio and put in a 10inch touch screen with Wireless carplay and integrated backup camera. Next up is dropping the trans to replace the clutch plate, throw-out bearing, resurface the flywheel, and replace the rear main seal on the engine while I'm down there because the flywheel is rusty and accumulates a thin layer of rust every morning that makes a grinding noise for 30 seconds until it grinds off.

    It definitely doesn't just work like a new car, but since I do the work myself it also doesn't cost me much.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Sounds like a pretty good project car it sounds to me like that is your hobby.

    I bet you have a very well provisioned toolset and a pretty sweet garage and don’t even think about the time you spend on that thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I have a todo list that will keep me busy for then next 3000 years, and that is before rebuilding the transmission on my 1999 is added to the list. (note that I assume the medical advances needed for me to live 3000 years are on someone else's list as I have no clue...) Eventually I have to give up on something so I can do something else.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 8 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    My radio doesn't even have a screen 😅

    The only computer in my car is the radio, and that stays off most of the time. I'm honestly thrilled to not have so much tech in the car. Its nice to be able to fix nearly anything with some pliers, a multi-meter, and an adjustable spanner.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    No engine control module in that thing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Nope! Mid 70s MG, carbuereted. As far as I know it has a crank triggered ignition, ergo fully mechanical.

    Edit: autocorrect assumed I no longer had this vehicle

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Tuned to run slightly lean with an aftermarket catalytic convertor installed.

    I do my best not to destroy the environment while still maintaining a vehicle I can work on myself

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Lean burning increases mileage, but produces nitrous oxides.

    Rich burning produces carbon monoxide, which eventually converts to CO2 in the atmosphere.

    Unit for unit, NOx emissions are 265 times as damaging as CO/CO2.

    https://scied.ucar.edu/learning-zone/how-climate-works/some-greenhouse-gases-are-stronger-others

    To successfully convert NOx, catalytic converters need a stoichiometric or slightly rich fuel/air mixture to the engine.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catalytic_converter

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Guess i have work to do. Thank you 🙏

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Indeed.

    Unfortunately, no matter how well you tune your carburetor, just a change in atmospheric temperature is enough to throw off your mixture.

    The only feasible way to adjust it fast enough to keep up with atmospheric changes is with some kind of fuel injection, an ECM, and an O2 sensor to provide the feedback needed for closed-loop mixture control.

    Fortunately: https://speeduino.com/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I've actually got a speeduino conversion on the agenda, but the car needs a full plumb in place rewire first. Its been through like 6 owners before me, one of which let it get infested with rats so a ton of the wiring had been replaced (notice I didn't say repaired, or fixed)

    The thing is a mess under the hood, I'm planning to run conduits with access loops every few feet to keep the wiring nice and clean. The end goal is California Ready but tbh I don't expect it to ever meet emissions requirements that strict with a carb instead of EFI. I guess since I'll be doing a speeduino conversion it wouldn't be that much more work yo convert to EFI, or at least mod a turbo blowby hat to accept a diesel atomizer with which to jury rig a carb into a carbuer-efi hybrid.

    Idk, I'm spitballing at this point.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Software enables new revenue streams. Manufacturers can lock out features and force people to pay subscriptions. The industry wants to normalize that so they get bigger margins and a source of revenue that extends long after the initial sale. Motor vehicle as a service.

    I like controls that don't distract from driving. Computers without any internet connection aren't a problem. I don't mind all the buttons and switches being connected to a micro-controller. It saves a lot of wiring and complexity. While I don't like screens I can see how they are useful for some people. Ideally you can use a vehicle offline and with the screens off.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    You can turn a lot of this stuff off. Still. Most of the driver assistant stuff is optional still.

    In another few years? Probably not. They will probably change insurance policies to hold you liable if you drive without it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Combining two of the things I most hate. Makes sense.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    What becoming?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Bill Burr calls it "driving an iPad"

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    My car is basically an accessory that turns my phone into a car, yes.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago
    [+] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Yes, but why? Are they in place to protect the spinning rust when you hard drive the car? Or has it something to do with cracked Windows and a missing driver?

    I'm always being extra careful around those computers on wheels, since most of them have a built-in backdoor!

    Fuel for thought...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I made sure my last car I bought had no modem in it. This is going to get a lot harder for my next. I will be probably limited to the used vehicles market.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    They're trying to for sure. Thats why I insisted on no electric doors, windows, or locks when I bought my truck. The CD player built in got yanked for an aftermarket mp3 CD player . no digital displays indash either

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    6 comments in c/fuckcars@lemmy.world view that post