all 63 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

(It's starting to feel like Proton is going to end up being a hosted Nextcloud)

I already have encrypted video conferencing with Matrix, but I just tried Proton Meet (I'm a Visionary customer) and it was indeed a smooth experience starting up a meeting. I will likely use it whenever I need to videoconf with some random.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)
    [–] 26 points 1 year ago* (17 children)

    Linux application this time? Still waiting for native support on Proton Drive.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Still waiting for ProtonVPN support for Linux distributions other than Ubuntu/"Gnome Debian".

    The Flatpak and Arch (I know, unofficial versions) packages appear to be broken for quite some time, and Proton devs have closed a bug report for it as it's not a "supported platform".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    What's broken about them? I just installed the package from the AUR a couple of days ago and it seems to be working fine for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Not sure if it was an issue with the flatpak version or AUR but it would have only one successful launch. Once you'd restart the app or PC, it would not launch at all, or it would launch, show server list but throw errors when trying to connect to a VPN server.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    So I just tried to replicate this issues two ways:

    1. I disconnected from the VPN, shut down the app, then restarted it and reconnected. I was able to establish a connection and checking my IP and for DNS leaks both showed I had a solid connection.
    2. I rebooted the PC and when I was back on the desktop, I started up the app and it connected almost immediately after hitting the quick connect button. I tested again and it passed.

    Maybe they've since corrected the issues you were seeing?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    That's not great! Come to think of it, I don't think I've stopped the application or restarted the PC since I installed it a couple of days ago. I'm gonna test it after work today and see if it behaves similarly and I'll report back what I find.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    IIRC there is are community Flatpaks for most of their apps and they work fine.

    Like I have Proton Mail/Calendar, VPN and Pass all installed on my Bluefin workstation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Proton recommends not using the community built apps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Unfortunately I have no other option since I am using Bluefin (based on Fedora Silverblue, i.e. atomic distro) and they seem to refuse to build the Flatpak themselves

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You gotta do what you gotta do.

    My first Linux distro was Silverblue. I tried installing the vpn using instructions from protonapp without success. That was the beginning of my annoyance with Proton's Linux support.

    I had to move to Workstation so the Proton apps would install.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (14 children)

    At this point I think I need to recalculate the cost for VPN and secure email. I'm paying for those, potentially value add things like drive are languishing (although I was hopeful with the community rclone adapter) and they are using funds for a lot of stuff that is irrelevant.

    There is a use for proton meet but is it really want the broad customer base wants? It feels like their leadership has a vision and customer needs are being bypassed.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Yeah. I would love to use proton drive on projects with other people. But I can't argue for proton drive when it doesn't have basic spreadsheets and presentations.

    I also can't leave Google drive until proton has those.

    Proton even bought Standard Notes but rather than port those features over they keep standing up other products.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago* (8 children)

    I remember when people thought offering VPN was a distraction from improving their email features.
    This complaint is getting old.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    To someone who is/was interested in Proton's email service but not their VPN service this may still be a fair point though imo. I don't think it being a rehashed complaint here automatically invalidates it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    Not automatically, no.
    But when a company roles out lots of new products that not everyone uses but many do, without abandoning development in their existing products? Yah, that complain gets tired, and I feel I'm justified in dismissing it out of hand.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    It's old because it shows ignorance of the situation, and vast misunderstanding of how companies are run and things are made.

    I'm waiting on a lot of things from Proton, mostly around them hiring more Linux Devs so they can flesh out that platform.

    But that being said, they haven't said they aren't doing it, it just isn't happening on the timeline I want. So I'm good. If I'm ever not good with that I can choose to not renew.

    Other products and features doesn't take away from my wish list. If they have 500 devs on staff and none of them are Linux experts, then them working on other projects doesn't take anything away from me, it only adds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    We've had consistent proof that they have no interest in Linux support though. The VPN and mail bridge are the only apps that work well. Proton Pass is barely an app and doesn't really work well at all (no biometric or polkit-based unlock, for example).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I think that conclusion is up for interpretation though. I mean, you could be right, but I wouldn't call anything proof.

    They have not said, we don't want to support Linux. Or we never intend to support Linux. What they have said is that they lack Linux developers to flesh out their products on that platform.

    They need more Linux devs, plain and simple. They don't have them and I will admit that is clearly not their priority.

    The crux of the matter is their focus isn't on Linux. But not focusing on Linux is not the same as not supporting it.

    Their clear focus is on Enterprise Business, quality privacy access for those that need it (be it journalists or oppressed countries), and general user privacy last.

    While Linux users tend to be more private in nature, 100% of us are still smaller than a fraction of their focus. It may seem counter intuitive for them being a privacy company to lack support in the most private platform, but it would also seem counter intuitive that using them to get away from Google products still requires the Play store and Gapps for notifications.

    So I take it all with a grain of salt.

    Again, you might be right. They might not have any interest in Linux in the long term. But I don't see the evidence that proves that without a doubt. Them not lining up with my opinion of how they should do things isn't proof of anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    The evidence is that they talk about having too few Linux devs while not posting open positions for Linux devs. Plenty of Linux devs would be interested in working for them. I would absolutely be interested in working for Proton, for example. They just don't have any genuine interest. Understandably so because of how small the Linux market share is. But let's not lie to ourselves. I like Proton and will probably continue to pay for it for the foreseeable future, but I'm not going to delude myself into thinking they have any interest in Linux at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Yeah, I respect that position. I can completely understand the feeling and I'm only a shade away from it. My take is that it's low priority, yours is that its zero interest. I hope I'm right, and that one day they can shift gears and get more done. Maybe I'm just optimistic.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    A possible counter argument could be that other customers don't use the services you do use and in the end it all evens out, but you'd need to look at the data to know if that actually is true. Perhaps if the all-in package has become less interesting for you and you could downgrade your membership to only get premium vpn or mail.

    But that aside, i totally agree the vision of the leadership only makes sense if it is based on the needs of customers and I also doubt whether they are Protons main interest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    That is absolutely true and I've been quite happy with the VPN and email offerings. I spend most of my time in tech literate communities where the call for Linux drive support is loudest and I'm not tied to all the other spaces.

    For me the question really becomes if I can save by switching providers or switch to a provider whose path better aligns to where I want to go. Drive is something I've had my eye on for a while as a way to make my subscription more valuable, instead all the 'value add' offerings they promote are not worth anything to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    i for one welcome more options that aren't google meet and zoom

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Meanwhile Linux users are left lacking features. What is this, 4 brand new services from Proton in as many months. MullvadVPN, Tuta, and Addy are looking more and more attractive every time you skip over Linux.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm regretting both prepaying for so many years of services and having so many email domains.

    I think I'm going to self host a mail server next and see how good it is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I wish they would add a Sheets/Excel competitor to go with the Docs competitor they have in Proton Drive now. My needs for a spreadsheet application fall squarely into a crack of being so little that its not worth hosting something myself but large enough that it is a good value add for some hosted service I am already using or paying for.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    Proton? Nope. Jitsi.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Lol, proton trying hard to get more customers. Every service they offer can be replaced be free and open source alternatives, or much cheaper and arguably more sovereign services

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Thank goodness! Thank you, I didnt hear that part of the story.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    it's not that clear. if you are interested, go reddit and read the post and comments.

    https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtonMail/comments/1ng1apv/clarifying_recent_misinformation/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I thought it wasn't fake, just a typical "oops sorry the auto-system tagged it, but we re-enabled it now". Either way, hard to pin it on Proton at this point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    As long you don't ask what happens when they don't get criticised in the news for it next time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Maybe. I love to hate on Proton as much as the next person, but this particular blip gets a pass from me based on what I've read.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Yeah this incident was really blown out of proportion. They received an alert, disabled the account to review, then reenabled it when the alert was not applicable.

    People can legitimately dunk on proton for a number of things but they did what they were supposed to in this case.

    I suspect 99% of people still yelling about this don't even know what actually happened and they are commenting based on an inaccurate/inflammatory headline.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    A signal alternative based on signal protocol outside of surveillance pact "eyes" would be nice

  • source
  • 15 comments in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    What’s up with the animosity for Proton around here? Did I miss something? What did they do?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I don’t remember all the details but their CEO said some unprompted pro Trump things and the retraction was halfhearted. That, combined with a couple cases like freezing journalists accounts that may or may not have been compromised (thus permissible to freeze imo), harmed their reputation among this community.

    I’m not in the loop enough to be an expert so please correct me. Their solutions currently work for me as a rando nobody that wanted a fast VPN that wasn’t YouTuber shilled.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    They also just recently banned a journalist after a request from a questionable cyber security company that was being reported on. They ignored and refused to reinstate the account until the story started making the rounds on social media, then made a very poor attempt at ass covering excuses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I understand the distrust for Proton, but I can't help but notice that this could be a huge upgrade for folks fleeing from Microsoft and Google suites.

    Edit: But for anyone who wants to conference call with a clean conscience, check out Matrix.org.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The biggest issue I have with software like this is convincing others to switch from their trusted video call software to one that they’ve never heard before.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    What's next? Proton Date? When can I date local girls while they know their rejections will be end to end encrypted, only meant for my eyes?

    It seems like Proton started using end to end encryption as a buzz word, only to enhance their marketing.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Oh look another half finished product from proton 🤦‍♂️

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)