you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Thank goodness! Thank you, I didnt hear that part of the story.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    it's not that clear. if you are interested, go reddit and read the post and comments.

    https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtonMail/comments/1ng1apv/clarifying_recent_misinformation/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I thought it wasn't fake, just a typical "oops sorry the auto-system tagged it, but we re-enabled it now". Either way, hard to pin it on Proton at this point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    As long you don't ask what happens when they don't get criticised in the news for it next time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Maybe. I love to hate on Proton as much as the next person, but this particular blip gets a pass from me based on what I've read.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Yeah this incident was really blown out of proportion. They received an alert, disabled the account to review, then reenabled it when the alert was not applicable.

    People can legitimately dunk on proton for a number of things but they did what they were supposed to in this case.

    I suspect 99% of people still yelling about this don't even know what actually happened and they are commenting based on an inaccurate/inflammatory headline.

  • source
  • parent