Anyone know of anything fitting an Eeepc?

top 44 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 17 points 1 year ago*

Puppy, Porteus, antiX, Q4OS, Slax run on 32-bit x86 and are supposed to be under the 256 MiB RAM mark.
Zorin Lite and Xubuntu ~512MiB.
Mint, LXDE and Bunsenlabs ~1GiB.

YMMV

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago* (8 children)

    Antix,Debian ,arch i386 project

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    i wouldn't recommend debian since they've dropped 32 bit support in trixie, their latest release. the previous release, bookworm, still supports 32 bits archs, but it eol's less than a year from now

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

    This is not true. (Edit: nevermind, I was wrong)

    They're dropping support for i586 and below. 32-bit systems with i686+ processors will still run fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    https://www.debian.org/releases/trixie/release-notes/issues.html#reduced-support-for-i386

    From trixie, i386 is no longer supported as a regular architecture: there is no official kernel and no Debian installer for i386 systems

    [...]

    Users running i386 systems should not upgrade to trixie. Instead, Debian recommends either reinstalling them as amd64, where possible, or retiring the hardware.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Not all 32-bit systems are i386. For example, my 32-bit Debian thinkpad runs Trixie just fine. Because it's i686 which is still supported.

    So again, Debian 13 isn't dropping 32-bit support. Just i586 support and below.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Not all 32-bit systems are i386

    but the debian i386 architecture means all 32 bit x86 processors. there's no "i686" build of debian

    there are no i586 or i686 kernel or iso available, you can look for them. i386 packages only exist for compatibility reasons, so you can run 32 bit applications on amd64 machines. please read the release notes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    but the debian i386 architecture means all 32 bit x86 processors.

    https://wiki.debian.org/i386

    That was very confusing to me. I'm sure they have their reasons, but calling it something like x86 would've been more clear to me.

    The original x86 platform. Now requires "686" class CPU. Unsupported in trixie and newer except in chroots on amd64 hosts.

    https://wiki.debian.org/SupportedArchitectures

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    I'm sure they have their reasons

    maybe compatibility reasons. i guess they used to support i386 back in the day and didn't want to break the couple of systems that were installed on bo and have been upgrading ever since

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    slackware, netbsd, openbsd

    edit: i forgot tinycore, you gotta try that too

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    +1 for NetBSD it’s such a great OS for ressource limited platforms. Rough edges by today standards but it worth a try on OP’s PC.

    Edit : would you please post something like neofetch screenshot when your eeepc is up and running ? :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    This thread is making me nostalgic for Ubuntu Netbook Remix

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Since I doubt the latest and greatest drivers interest you, I suggest debian. Might as well profit from extreme stability and reliability

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Debian has dropped support for 32 bit in Debian 13.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Use debian 12 then, again, its not like you need the latest and gratest

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Debian. Just Debian. No drama.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    OpenSUSE has a 32-bit build.

    Running modern web browsers is no fun.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    My eepc is also 32 bit with 2gb of RAM. I did Debian 12 with LXDE from the net installer and it works really well.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    I've had good luck with Antix on very old machines.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    I loved my Eee PC so much.

    I’ve been watching and hoping for a modern ARM equivalent, but haven’t seen anything quite right so far.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Bunsenlab Linux..

    Though don't expect miracles, that cpu is too slow for the modern internet. It's not usable for web browsing on any OS.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I think it should be okay. I have a pentium M machine that did alright with web browsing on Bunsenlabs. Had 2 gb of ram. I used an original eeepc and an MSI u230 wind with the same cpu. The atom and pentium M are about the same

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    When? Currently 240p youtube will produce frame drops on these. Typical javascript laden web pages can take minutes to render. I guess it largely depends on the websites you plan to visit. Phoronix will work ok.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I also have a gpu in it (ATI mobility Radeon 9700) so there is that. Web browsing was slow but not impossible. I did use discord with my old pentium M machine. (only web bc 32 bit). YouTube did work but not well. I was using smplayer for YouTube. Also this was before everything went to av1 encoding and I haven't tried it since.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    MX runs fine, but applications such as browsers are very slow because of the old CPU 😐

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    @ everyone recommending debian: it no longer supports 32 bit x86 machines: https://www.debian.org/releases/trixie/release-notes/issues.html#reduced-support-for-i386

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Something with LXDE or XFCE Desktop Environment, that is usually the DE for low-spec distros.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    MenuetOS or KolibriOS

    Maybe Haiku if you're feeling fancy

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    One of the OG eeepc is what got me into Linux. The distro it shipped with was ass (it was a Linux variant) so I went hopping and discovered Puppy Linux and a bunch of others. Ended up sticking with !# (crunchbang) which later renamed to BunsenLabs and I still run it on most of my devices to this day.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago

    I ran Puppeee on my original which loaded completely to ram and only wrote to disk every 10 minutes or when prompted due to the early ssds very limited life span. It helped me get through folkhögskola and was small enough to let me easily work on the 1 hour 30 min bus ride to and from school. I think that model was called 4G and it was even tighter keyboard than my current due to åäö-keys being almost half width

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I'm not familiar with Eee PCs but I'm assuming you'd want something lightweight. Q4OS has a 32-bit version available.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Lets say I had 8 chromebooks 4gb ram idk CPU and their all working. What realistically could I do with them? Some lenovo some google.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Another issue others are not addressing is the memory limitations of 32bit software. I am facing it now with a large database that is stuck in a 32 bit world. You may have issues finding 32 bit builds of software as well.

  • source
  • Depending on the age of the EEE, you might run into problems because the old low end CPU doesn't support instruction set extensions that are assumed to be present by distros nowadays. I think it was SSE2...?

  • source
  • FreeBSD offers a 32 bit variant still via their i386 image.

    Expect a small learning curve if you've never used UNIX, but most things are similar enough that you'll be fine. If you're ok picking up the FreeBSD handbook.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago