all 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 40 points 1 year ago

Sadly not always. Perhaps 80 % of the papers I try to find are there and perhaps 60 % of the books.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I was going to comment that Library Genesis went offline earlier this year, but I'm very happy to see that I'm wrong and it seems to be back.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago* (12 children)

    How large is scihub , if you wanted to download the whole thing?

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] [S] 25 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    So about $800 in HDDs. Steep but reasonable for all the knowledge man has acquired so far.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    All of human knowledge is not encoded into academia.

    Academia is heavily western biased.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Then get digitizing. We have unicode and AI text extraction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Not every human knowledge is written ;)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I don't understand why you're getting downvoted. You're not wrong. Sci-Hub focuses on academic journal articles, which are a pretty novel phenomenon. The first journal was created in the 17th century, and journals didn't become the primary medium for publications until well into the 19th century. I wouldn't say academia is "biased" per se, but it's true that the academic publishing business is heavily dominated by western companies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    I think both statements are true - not all knowledge is recorded by academia, and academia is heavily western biased.

    What I suspect is that the down-votes are because the first user was using hyperbole to make a positive comment about our ability to archive these documents and their value. The response points out something that is evident - obviously academic papers do not hold all human knowledge - and shifts the conversation into a not so casual topic of western biases. This sudden shift of the conversation from friendly-casual to geopolitical with little motivation can make some users upset.

    OR, as the other person suggested, maybe the mention of 'western bias' is enough to trigger some.

  • source
  • parent