top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 106 points 1 year ago
[–] 47 points 1 year ago
[–] 85 points 1 year ago (30 children)

The reaction has been absurd, but their new logo was definitely awful.

  • source
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

    I don't think that the old logo is great either, and the update did improve on technical aspects. You don't want to have all that small text, for example. And generally, simpler logos are preferable.

    But...their shtick is a rustic feel. Whatever you can say about the original logo, it did evoke that. I have a hard time seeing the new one doing that.

    EDIT: I also think that this compares favorably to another controversial recent rebrand: Musk rebranding Twitter, which was generally seen as not a good idea; Twitter already had a strong brand identity. People weren't happy and Musk went right ahead with it regardless. At Cracker Barrel, the initial response was "calm down, it'll be okay", but they were willing to second-guess themselves, even though I expect that there were people there who were invested in the rebrand.

    EDIT2: They'd also done smaller, more incremental changes to the logo in the past, because the "Old Country Store" text had had its typeface changed at some point in the past.

    EDIT3: Here's a more-comprehensive history:

    https://dwglogo.com/cracker-barrel-logo/

    1000009253

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I do find it amusing that the “classic” logo everyone is pining for is from the “ancient” year of 1997…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Tbf as weird as it sounds, ‘97 is vintage now

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    On the long drive to and from vacation last week I noticed the 2024-25 picture used a lot and I thought wait they already have a version without the other stuff and it looks fine so why the hell are they changing it again when its perfectly fine the way it is? My biggest complaint of the newest one was just that it featured no border. It already looked weird, but without that border, it just didn't work at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Kinda wish the public had a similar outrage when Fruit of the Loom modernized their logo in 2000, lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Who gives a fuck? Let's focus on the fascist takeover happening in every city in the country, and the billionaires almost completely winning the war on the populace.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    How was it awful?

    Could you tell me what the heck this yellow blob shape is supposed to be?

    From a purely graphic design perspective, the classic logo is too busy and doesn't scale well. The only thing it has going for it is the weirdness of the shape and the distinct color combination. It's technically a really bad logo. You may not prefer the new logo but, technically, it's a whole lot better. It's far more adaptable to newer platforms while stilling being recognizable. Now, as far as being an effective representation of the brand and if that's a corporate concern, I don't know that I can comment on that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    In another post about this, someone posted a bunch of other fast food logos, and they all looked very much the same, especially in silhouette. They're all just a same-y blend of mediocrity, whereas the existing logo was at least unique.

    McDonald's probably has the best and most distinctive logo out of anyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Yellow blob is obviously a speech bubble.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I'm not conservative in the slightest and I thought the redesign was completely ass.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Yes, but did you go unhinged calling it "woke"? The logo was a poor fit and I could get behind it, but so many MAGAs losing it over calling a lame logo "woke"....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    I've never seen people freak out so hard over a LOGO change. Jesus, it's not like they changed the typeface to Comic Sans or Papyrus or some shit!

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Jaguar cars: am I a joke to you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Jaguar was less about the logo and more about that whole marketing campaign. It was like they were doing a cologne commercial and left out the car completely. The logo change was the least of it.

    When we did finally see the car, it looked like an AI generated concept, not an actual car. :(

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 34 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    Thank god! Now can we get back to the important issues? How's that WAR ON CHRISTMAS going?

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The war on Christmas CANNOT END until Christmas ceases its illegal occupation of November.

    We are once again calling on the Claus regime to return to their side of the borders outlined in the Black Friday agreement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    There are xmas decorations in stores right now. And it was very funny to hear the Halloween decorations making spooky noises at them. I hate this badly written episode of Star Trek!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I just want people to start complaining about "x-mas" again so I can explain very slowly what the Greek letter Chi is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Good luck with that. The explaining part, I mean.

    I've had xtians hound me on various forums for using their own abbreviation, LOL. Even after explaining it to them, they'd still get worked up into a poutrage, deny what I told them, which was obviously true, and, at least on Denver Post forums, run to the mods to try to get me banned and/or my posts taken down.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    So the war on Christmas is odd on a theological and economic level. The secular (pagan?) Side is driven by corporations not the woke left. A fact often ignored by the evangelical right.

    So what solution do they even want? A commercial with Jesus on the cross saying he thirts and having a Roman soldier pass him a chilled and refreshing coca cola?

    Maybe a nativity where one of the wisemen is like and we got something for Joseph too and hand him a power saw?

    Wtf

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It started because Starbucks had a disposable cup without the words Christmas on it. It was a generic Holiday cup they used through Nov-early Jan. Suddenly we are under attack! Very stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I think the anger over saying 'happy holidays' instead of 'merry christmas' predated that, because christians have found a way to get outraged over everything for a looong time. I was pretty happy just this week that dobson died, because focus on the family underpinned a lot of those sentiments that passed through the american christian sects.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I've already fired my first salvo. By now I would have had at least three or four gifts already purchased and ready for the Christmas season. I haven't even bothered. And I won't. It's going to be a lean Christmas and it's going to hurt the capitalist assholes who are fucking up our country.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago

    I will continue to not care at all about it. Release the Epstein files.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    Wait a minute. The logo is literally a cracker and a barrel 🤣. I'm surprised conservatives are ok being made fun of.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    Called it. They new coke'd that shit.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Just what we needed. Conservatives feeling even more empowered. Goddamnit.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Maybe this success will inspire them to redirect their attention from politics to corporate branding practices.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (23 children)

    Was it really conservative backlash? I don't think anyone liked it, lol.

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (15 children)

    Non-conservatives give a shit about cracker barrel?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I gotta meet up with the old people in my family somewhere. I'm not having them in my house are you crazy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    LOL, that's been the only reason I've ever set foot in one. People who were very much older in my extended family liked the place....and so for whatever reason, I kind of thought of the place like Grange halls - something the older bunch have an affinity for, but I don't quite understand how it fits into my life in the here and now. :/

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Have you tried literally anywhere else? Every few years my wife convinces me to try it again and it's always the worst. Are there really no local breakfast places around?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Some people out there are really reluctant to branch out and try anything different. There's a million places around me selling the same food but better, but some people just want to go to cracker barrel.

    Old people especially, but also some people with, for example, autism, ARFID, etc. can be really picky about where they'll eat, and sometimes it's just not worth the aggravation of trying to get them to try something new.

    Hell, I have some friends who aren't even particularly picky who can be reluctant to try out new places. Restaurants aren't cheap, I can understand being reluctant to spend money on food you're not sure you're going to like.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Restaurants aren’t cheap, I can understand being reluctant to spend money on food you’re not sure you’re going to like.

    That and sometimes you have to go to the same restaurant a few times until you find the dishes that are good there...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I don't know. I don't eat there often, but pretty much everything they make is good. I can't even think of another place that makes chicken and dumplings... For that style of food, I would always take a higher end one off restaurant in the Carolina. But for something ubiquitous, it is pretty much the only option, and it isn't as expensive as Shatley Springs or something.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Uhhh, there's a shit ton of Cracker Barrels in NY, going to Cracker Barrel for family meet ups and shit was a staple in my family and made precious childhood memories for me, and we're black as hell. Plenty of non conservatives love CB. There's a shit ton black people makes jokes online rn about missing the "segregation" vibes of CB.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I only learned about it when I saw headlines about the backlash that was costing them millions.

    My first reaction after figuring out it was not the Onion was....are they still in business? I honestly didn't know they were still operating. I looked on the map in the Denver area and the one I thought was in Littleton/Lakewood area either is a figment of my imagination, or they closed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [Other Party]’s general population is totally upset about something [Our Party] thinks is good or even doesn’t give a fuck about!

    We must be reactionary over the most trivial stupid shit and bicker and deflect from [List of Enormous Issues and Catastrophes], and create a new issue for everyone to point fingers about!

    /s

    Personally, I think it looks terrible and I’m a die-hard lefty/socialist/liberal whatever you wanna call me. I don’t eat there and don’t give a fuck about them, but this media attention over this “controversy” has pushed me to form an opinion on something I wouldn’t otherwise care about — and honestly if conservatives hate it, then fuck, I agree with them for once because it looks fuckin’ soulless and terrible lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I am so confused as to why anyone gives a fucking shit about this.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago

    No bigger snowflake than a MAGAt.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Huh. I guess crackers like representation too.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Lol.

    Boomer oriented company chooses to stay in business for a few more years until boomers are all gone.

    I went into a Cracker Barrel once. 90% elderly.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Who gives a shit about a logo??? Companies can do whatever the hell they want with their logos so shut up about it and start asking: WHERE'S THE EPSTEIN FILES???

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    86 comments in c/nottheonion@lemmy.world view that post