How about you call up the president and have him reverse the tariffs.
Jesus. This article is like getting through a recipe blog. The first third (at leas, I didn't make it further) is about the author's knowledge of pennies.
I can only assume, as a person with a functioning brain who has lived on planet earth for nearly 50 years, that the pennies are not in fact trash but perfectly legal tender. I was hoping to find a line in this story to contradict its initial bold claim but...
The initial draft of the story I filed for a popular New York City–based publication was 20,000 words long. (Sadly, all of the best parts everyone would have loved were cut by my psychotic editor, whose No. 1 passion in life was removing 13,000 perfect words from my first drafts; I’m not worried about him reading these words, because a low-class butcher like that doesn’t possess enough humanity to subscribe to The Atlantic—though, if you happen to know William, I would thank you not to send him a gift link to this article.) And what I learned was that there was no sane reason why.
This article should be title: Journalism is Trash.
Yes. It was. But you go ahead and cherry-pick the content that fits your narrative. I'm just trying to tell you you're wasting your time responding to me.
My statement was in regard to PBS not including a photo of the thing the story is about.
Not sure you're responding to the right person. Maybe get some sleep, boss.
I do agree with you. But on the other hand...
people not knowing things and then doing something when they find out get caught is... ?
Disappointing that the linked article doesn't include a photo of the tattoo. When a report lacks important relevant information, the reader has a choice to take it for its word or seek out supporting facts. So, when I searched for Planter Nazi Tattoo, there are plenty of articles taking the opposing tone - in that he knew what the tattoo was.
https://www.dailykos.com/story/2025/10/21/2349761/-Not-one-diary-or-mention-about-Graham-Platner-s-Nazi-tattoo-Really This sounds more like he has been aware of what the tattoo represented and he hasn't really cared about it until now. Which I personally find much more believable. Good on him for getting it covered up but, ehhh. Maybe don't believe every word a politician exhales.
I don't know this person or anything about Maine. I don't really care either. But journalism needs to be held accountable. I expect more from PBS / AP.
During an exchange in the Oval Office, Real America’s Voice correspondent Brian Glenn showed Trump a photo of a trans flag currently on display in Washington, DC, and claimed that “a lot of people are very threatened” by it.
Dear motherfucker, what are you going to do about those of us who feel threatened by the American Flag?
Reading this article, I have never in my nearly fifty years of life witnessed anything like this. Jackson is calling to detain all transgender people. Loomer is calling to designate transgender people terrorists.
These people - I'll say all conservatives - are so pathetic and dysfunctional that they're unable to observe reality and deal with it in a responsible manner. Instead, they choose to turn something difficult or uncomfortable into an enemy or a cancer and deal with things as an immature child would - just stomp on it.
If zines were delivered directly to all of humanity instantaneously and were an actual money maker financed by mega corporations, sure.
That enforces my point. Why should anyone care about some other person who, some may say, should have been spied on?
I think the reason why this may be something you're wondering about is because we have given podcasters a larger influence in recent years. Not to say that's bad, but it's new.
Personally, I don't consider podcasters or YouTubers, etc., trustworthy sources of information or honest dialog. I'm not sure that's something that even exists anyway now.
There's a much larger conversation to be had about where we spend our time and give our attention and why. The real news is boring so we turn to salacious clickbait that we often know has a bias to it. The more time we hand our emotions over to this content, then more it becomes part of our psyche. Sometimes we don't have a choice but I still know a ton of people who are entirely clueless about politics. So, some people are making choices, for better or worse.
I see Kirk's legacy the same as Rogan's and Trump's. These people are a reflection of our times. Something is very wrong in our world today and we've spent the last twenty five years shifting, metaphorically, from CBS Evening News to The National Enquirer.
This is the result of great freedom: a wild storm of ideas with equal opportunity to be expressed and heard. Not something that existed before the internet or having instant world wide communications in your hand or selling your information in order to maintain your attention with biased (mis/dis)information.
I just want to ask on behalf of people who don't care about this, "why should I care about this"?
Because every time I bring up how much we're being spied on by the government or Amazon or Google, et al, people just shrug it off. At best, they'll admit it's a problem - for people who should be worried about it. Meaning, "I've got nothing to hide". If nothing else, Americans lack (or choose to reject) the basic concept of a shared society. If there's a threat that the government is spying on people, we believe it's the "other" people, not "us".
Threats to our privacy is largely hypothetical for the majority of people. I'd even argue that the whole premise of privacy is no longer what it was just 15-20 years ago. I've even had people argue with me that they 'want' to be tracked so the ads they see are relevant to them.
So, I could see some Americans read this story and be in full support of this. They believe in a spy state as a means of protection. Ironically, these are also often the same people flying "Don't Tread On Me" flags.