post
I hate this argument. "You people can't exist in public because I might have to talk to my stupid kids".
No.
you people can't exist in public or stories because i made my kids stupid bigots, and seeing you might make them question that and make q lot more work for me if i want them to be as stupid and bigoted as i am
I know this, because my grandma said this shit to me about literally this asshole. He made my shitty racist grandma half correct about her shitty racism.
Edit: Fuck him with a three foot wide strap on that needs to be worn by two women who are making out in front of his grandkid.
Can confirm. My grandmother tried talking to me in the car once convincing me to be homophobic. She said they might "call me 'heterosexual'" Couldn't even find the right pejorative
About one thing she said out of racism about specifically him.
Also, if hes against queer shit, he cant choose his name. What's his real name?
Edit: downthread says its 'calvin broadus'. Mr. Broad<s needs to shut his stupid fucking mouth; no fasch cock for him to suck in that theater. Especially not in front of his fucking grandkids.
Calvin Broadus. Not so flashy now, eh Dogg?!
Also, if hes against queer shit, he cant choose his name.
I agree with you otherwise but I don't think this is correct.
It's not a question of being visible in public, it's just a question of proportion. Hollywood seems to need gays and lesbians in every movie now. Is it marketing to attract "minorities" ?
There are straight people in literally every movie. Do you have an issue with that?
Yeah, there's nothing wrong with people being gay as long as they do it in secret and "normal" people don't have to acknowledge it. /s
My comment refers to overrepresentation.
No such thing.
Around 5% of the population. So yes it's overrepresented
Let me repeat myself: there is no such thing as "overrepresentation". There isn't, and shouldn't be, a moral or legal law that states that TV and movie producers have to follow census data strictly in their casting. That would be stupid.
It seems to me that films are supposed to be as close to reality as possible to be credible.
You're thinking about "documentaries". There's this whole other universe of films commonly referred to as "fiction". Or are you upset that Hobbits are overrepresented in The Lord of the Rings, blue aliens in Avatar and people who can fly in Superman, too? Maybe there's too many British people in Downton Abbey and too few Vietnamese in West Side Story?
Just speaking about the most common movies not scify or fantasy.
In that case I've already explained why you're wrong.
Having a different opinion to yours doesn't necessarily mean it's wrong. In this case, it's you who lacks tolerance.
Yes, a cartoon lesbian couple is highly inappropriate for the grandson of a drug huffing, ho banging gangster.
While his take here is shitty, I think doing drugs and having sex with women for money is not something that warrants out right condemnation imo.
His involvement in murder and assault, and the sexual assault and battery accusations are much more damming and legit reasons to shit on him though.
it's not condemnation, it's pointing out hypocrisy.
If I had to choose between explaining how 2 women have a baby and explaining what "pimpin' a ho" and "187 on an undercover cop" means, I know what I'd prefer.
I don't know if hypocrisy is the right term. Maybe in an extremely broad sense but then it starts to lose its meaning.
the man has financed and produced lesbian pornos. i don't think it's that broad.
Okay but nobody said that. They said 'how dare somebody who likes drugs and has done sex work hate someobe marginalized!'
i'm reading it as a dig on things that are indicative of his general demeanour and the way he has historically wished to be perceived. it's not about smoking weed and banging hoes (both of which i must point out are illegal in most of the world still), it's about being someone who hoes weeds and bangs smoke, and then drawing the line at a queer couple. it's not "a person", it's specifically snoop.
in that situation, him also having produced pornos lines up.
And thats problematic in just... So many fucking ways.
Like i genuinely dont even know where to start, but maybe: it feels a little homophobic, and also you're accepting the puritanical cultural framework of what is and isn't transgressive, that makes a drag queen reading books to kids more outrageous than avpriest fucking them.
no? i'm talking about a single person. i'm not generalising in any way.
nowhere did i state that any of the things he's done are wrong or right, simply that he has inconsistent beliefs. my own beliefs did not come into it.
What you center in discourse is part of the message tho.
elaborate.
I cant tell if youre being obtuse and tedious or genuinely curious here
But have you stopped beating your wife?
i just find it so annoying when specific statements are generalized to turn an argument around. it's the typical internet argument of "oh you like pancakes? why do you hate waffles? don't you know more people like waffles? why are you shitting on them like this? you asshole"
Im against splash damage.
what's the splash damage from calling snoop a hypocrite?
Scroll up. This was explained. If you think it was not adequately explained; we do not need to speak.
what i see when i scroll up is you pivoting from "this specific guy is a hypocrite" to "someone saying this after having done that is a hypocrite" and condemning that. but those two things are not equivalent at all.
But there's nothing wrong with fucking or doing drigs, and the perspn 'pointing out hypocrisy' didn't mention that hes a rapist
Conservatives THINK there's something wrong with that shit though. He's acting like someone who thinks there's something wrong with that shit, while still trying to cash in on that image
And im saying we shouldnt validate that. Fuck them, they're wrong about basically everuthing, including being conservative.
Like the greek classics statuewank guys who dont want to see the original pain jobs or all the gay sex people had in front of them.
Like, if they can't compromise, cant consider us human, why pretend, why try to compromise with them? Just tell them its whatever compromise the left comes up with by ourselves, or the highway. I bet it would even work better politically.
Broadly it might not be worthy of condemnation, but in the context of "child appropriate" it would seem to be way less appropriate than what he is complaining about.
Just weed lol
"well baby snoop it's called adoption" as if they'd have a problem explaining little orphan Annie or Stuart little or any number of adopted children
Grandpa why are your eyes so red?
Grandson, listen close as I impart this important wisdom I've accumulated in my time
Smoke weed everyday.
My son just started third grade. It is actually super easy to answer questions like this if you're a kind person who allows others to keep their humanity if they are different, and if you actually cultivate a relationship with your child.
Explaining how two women parent a child? Wow, that must be tough my snoop guy. Better to just hide from the public like a little bitch, as you might say.
I mean, I've had to address things like the topic of death because of a grandparent dying young and a future sibling ending in a miscarriage. And the original due date recently passed too. oof.
But thank fucking god that in my family's weakened state, none of us were assaulted by the vile image of two women holding hands and kissing a baby on the head at the same time.
Check this out though Dogg: if you were sent back 50 years in time with white skin and no memory, within a week you'd be fighting to bring back segregation. Cunt.
Also, if hes anti queer, he needs to use his REAL name-im told calvin broadus.
He worked long and hard to be called
Simple
Nobody who is
Out
Of touch with all the
People who brought him fame and wealth
That really adds to the evidence that he's always been a sell out.
Its obvious in retrospect but now that he's a right wing grifter its hard to avoid now.
So your grandson has an understanding on the biology of reproduction, but is stumped by the idea of adoption? I think the kid might be dumb, big chief.
That movie is set way in the future and the baby looks like both of the mothers. I don't think it was an adoption, I think the assumption is that they somehow figured out a way to have 2 women have a baby together with both of their DNA in the future. I watched it with my kid n kinda thought huh, that's a bit of an odd choice, but my kids didn't ask, and frankly I didn't care. The movie was shit though, and this tiny, weird bit of plot was irrelevant to it sucking. The decision to replace the voice actor for Buzz was super annoying. He just sounded wrong and the movie was fucking space groundhog day but worse.
That movie is set way in the future and the baby looks like both of the mothers.
Sperm banks stock from a variety of ethnic backgrounds and etc to enable this; sometimes they use donor material from siblings on the non ... Directy involved partner for the same reason
Upvoting for awareness of what a snowflake Snoop is and in the hopes we can get past the “awww he and Martha Stewart are best buds” era.
“I don’t go to the movies to have conversations with my grandkids about the world and stuff. I go to ignore him for the day!”
Hero to zero, dude.
It's wild to me that someone who got rich selling songs to teens about fucking bitches, selling drugs and killing cops could keep a straight have (edit: face! Straight face!) while saying he's offended about anything.
the first sign was him chilling with trump and right wingers. he smoked so much weed it damaged his brain.
I feel like I've got whiplash over the general public's perception of Snoop over the last decade or so
Rofl what a snowflake. Like you don't want to tell your kids where babies come from? There aren't that many sources...
movie literally talks of time distortions
kids would be confused about a kiss
Sure
I'm sorry that a former rapper and gang-banger had to explain the concept of adoption to his grand-kid. Must have been traumatizing.
Snoop dog, “murder was the case that they gave me”, album called doggy style, straight up gangster, legendary pothead, criminalized and still became a successful decent person who has released affirmation songs for kids recently. Doesn’t understand gays.
He's really just starting his right winged grift phase. Happens to lots of rich folk who are starting to fade from the contemporary cultural zeitgeist.
Killing people is fine but you realize a ton of early hip-hop and West Coast rap was explicitly about not loving the homies, right? Even Superman didn't get a pass on Rapper's Delight...
top 98 comments