top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 84 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 76 points 1 year ago (24 children)

    I hate this argument. "You people can't exist in public because I might have to talk to my stupid kids".

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

    No.

    you people can't exist in public or stories because i made my kids stupid bigots, and seeing you might make them question that and make q lot more work for me if i want them to be as stupid and bigoted as i am

    I know this, because my grandma said this shit to me about literally this asshole. He made my shitty racist grandma half correct about her shitty racism.

    Edit: Fuck him with a three foot wide strap on that needs to be worn by two women who are making out in front of his grandkid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

    About one thing she said out of racism about specifically him.

    Also, if hes against queer shit, he cant choose his name. What's his real name?

    Edit: downthread says its 'calvin broadus'. Mr. Broad<s needs to shut his stupid fucking mouth; no fasch cock for him to suck in that theater. Especially not in front of his fucking grandkids.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    It's not a question of being visible in public, it's just a question of proportion. Hollywood seems to need gays and lesbians in every movie now. Is it marketing to attract "minorities" ?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Yeah, there's nothing wrong with people being gay as long as they do it in secret and "normal" people don't have to acknowledge it. /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    My comment refers to overrepresentation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Around 5% of the population. So yes it's overrepresented

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Let me repeat myself: there is no such thing as "overrepresentation". There isn't, and shouldn't be, a moral or legal law that states that TV and movie producers have to follow census data strictly in their casting. That would be stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    It seems to me that films are supposed to be as close to reality as possible to be credible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    You're thinking about "documentaries". There's this whole other universe of films commonly referred to as "fiction". Or are you upset that Hobbits are overrepresented in The Lord of the Rings, blue aliens in Avatar and people who can fly in Superman, too? Maybe there's too many British people in Downton Abbey and too few Vietnamese in West Side Story?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Just speaking about the most common movies not scify or fantasy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    In that case I've already explained why you're wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Having a different opinion to yours doesn't necessarily mean it's wrong. In this case, it's you who lacks tolerance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    You're complaining that too many people of the "wrong" kind are represented in media and I'm the one who lacks tolerance? Man, I thought maybe you were just ignorant but it turns out you're actually mentally handicapped.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 125 points 1 year ago (27 children)

    Yes, a cartoon lesbian couple is highly inappropriate for the grandson of a drug huffing, ho banging gangster.

  • source
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 1 year ago (23 children)

    While his take here is shitty, I think doing drugs and having sex with women for money is not something that warrants out right condemnation imo.

    His involvement in murder and assault, and the sexual assault and battery accusations are much more damming and legit reasons to shit on him though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 1 year ago (20 children)

    it's not condemnation, it's pointing out hypocrisy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (15 children)

    I don't know if hypocrisy is the right term. Maybe in an extremely broad sense but then it starts to lose its meaning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    the man has financed and produced lesbian pornos. i don't think it's that broad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (13 children)

    Okay but nobody said that. They said 'how dare somebody who likes drugs and has done sex work hate someobe marginalized!'

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (12 children)

    i'm reading it as a dig on things that are indicative of his general demeanour and the way he has historically wished to be perceived. it's not about smoking weed and banging hoes (both of which i must point out are illegal in most of the world still), it's about being someone who hoes weeds and bangs smoke, and then drawing the line at a queer couple. it's not "a person", it's specifically snoop.

    in that situation, him also having produced pornos lines up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago* (11 children)

    And thats problematic in just... So many fucking ways.

    Like i genuinely dont even know where to start, but maybe: it feels a little homophobic, and also you're accepting the puritanical cultural framework of what is and isn't transgressive, that makes a drag queen reading books to kids more outrageous than avpriest fucking them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (10 children)

    no? i'm talking about a single person. i'm not generalising in any way.

    nowhere did i state that any of the things he's done are wrong or right, simply that he has inconsistent beliefs. my own beliefs did not come into it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (9 children)

    What you center in discourse is part of the message tho.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I cant tell if youre being obtuse and tedious or genuinely curious here

    But have you stopped beating your wife?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)

    i just find it so annoying when specific statements are generalized to turn an argument around. it's the typical internet argument of "oh you like pancakes? why do you hate waffles? don't you know more people like waffles? why are you shitting on them like this? you asshole"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    what's the splash damage from calling snoop a hypocrite?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Scroll up. This was explained. If you think it was not adequately explained; we do not need to speak.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    what i see when i scroll up is you pivoting from "this specific guy is a hypocrite" to "someone saying this after having done that is a hypocrite" and condemning that. but those two things are not equivalent at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    But there's nothing wrong with fucking or doing drigs, and the perspn 'pointing out hypocrisy' didn't mention that hes a rapist

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Conservatives THINK there's something wrong with that shit though. He's acting like someone who thinks there's something wrong with that shit, while still trying to cash in on that image

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • And im saying we shouldnt validate that. Fuck them, they're wrong about basically everuthing, including being conservative.

    Like the greek classics statuewank guys who dont want to see the original pain jobs or all the gay sex people had in front of them.

    Like, if they can't compromise, cant consider us human, why pretend, why try to compromise with them? Just tell them its whatever compromise the left comes up with by ourselves, or the highway. I bet it would even work better politically.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Broadly it might not be worthy of condemnation, but in the context of "child appropriate" it would seem to be way less appropriate than what he is complaining about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 209 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    "well baby snoop it's called adoption" as if they'd have a problem explaining little orphan Annie or Stuart little or any number of adopted children

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Grandpa why are your eyes so red?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 39 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    My son just started third grade. It is actually super easy to answer questions like this if you're a kind person who allows others to keep their humanity if they are different, and if you actually cultivate a relationship with your child.

    Explaining how two women parent a child? Wow, that must be tough my snoop guy. Better to just hide from the public like a little bitch, as you might say.

    I mean, I've had to address things like the topic of death because of a grandparent dying young and a future sibling ending in a miscarriage. And the original due date recently passed too. oof.

    But thank fucking god that in my family's weakened state, none of us were assaulted by the vile image of two women holding hands and kissing a baby on the head at the same time.

    Check this out though Dogg: if you were sent back 50 years in time with white skin and no memory, within a week you'd be fighting to bring back segregation. Cunt.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Also, if hes anti queer, he needs to use his REAL name-im told calvin broadus.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That really adds to the evidence that he's always been a sell out.

    Its obvious in retrospect but now that he's a right wing grifter its hard to avoid now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    I always thought Dre and Snoop were badass since 2001, with music at least, I know they were pretty shitty back in the day. Then I saw Snoop in a music video with Katy Perry and have hated him since for being such a money grubbing sellout.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 159 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    So your grandson has an understanding on the biology of reproduction, but is stumped by the idea of adoption? I think the kid might be dumb, big chief.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    That movie is set way in the future and the baby looks like both of the mothers. I don't think it was an adoption, I think the assumption is that they somehow figured out a way to have 2 women have a baby together with both of their DNA in the future. I watched it with my kid n kinda thought huh, that's a bit of an odd choice, but my kids didn't ask, and frankly I didn't care. The movie was shit though, and this tiny, weird bit of plot was irrelevant to it sucking. The decision to replace the voice actor for Buzz was super annoying. He just sounded wrong and the movie was fucking space groundhog day but worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    That movie is set way in the future and the baby looks like both of the mothers.

    Sperm banks stock from a variety of ethnic backgrounds and etc to enable this; sometimes they use donor material from siblings on the non ... Directy involved partner for the same reason

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 97 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Upvoting for awareness of what a snowflake Snoop is and in the hopes we can get past the “awww he and Martha Stewart are best buds” era.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    “I don’t go to the movies to have conversations with my grandkids about the world and stuff. I go to ignore him for the day!”

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    It's wild to me that someone who got rich selling songs to teens about fucking bitches, selling drugs and killing cops could keep a straight have (edit: face! Straight face!) while saying he's offended about anything.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago

    Snoop has got to be the biggest sellout in the entire history of music.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    the first sign was him chilling with trump and right wingers. he smoked so much weed it damaged his brain.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago

    You are a sad, strange little man.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago

    Of all the things to fear for your child

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    I feel like I've got whiplash over the general public's perception of Snoop over the last decade or so

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago

    Rofl what a snowflake. Like you don't want to tell your kids where babies come from? There aren't that many sources...

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago

    movie literally talks of time distortions

    kids would be confused about a kiss

    Sure

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago

    I'm sorry that a former rapper and gang-banger had to explain the concept of adoption to his grand-kid. Must have been traumatizing.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    Snoop dog, “murder was the case that they gave me”, album called doggy style, straight up gangster, legendary pothead, criminalized and still became a successful decent person who has released affirmation songs for kids recently. Doesn’t understand gays.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago

    What a piece of shitpost

  • source
  • [–] 81 points 1 year ago

    What a piece of shit

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›