top 40 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 85 points 1 year ago

Good. Neuter the fascists.

  • source
  • [–] 59 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Please please PLEASE let this work!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You can quote me on this. Not only will this not work. They won't even actually implement anything to a degree that would even be able to make a difference.

    Source: Democrats saying things and not following through for my entire lifetime.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Once you start tearing up democratically elected seats, and I’m not saying don’t because fuck fascists, but once you do you gotta think that republic is on flimsy ground.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The House is supposed to provide proportional representation, per the US Constitution. It has not since the early 20th century. Instead, it gives significant increased representation to people in lower population states.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Madison's Grand Compromise was to give EXTRA representation to low population states (2 senators regardless of a States population), not proportional representation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    The only way to fight unconstitutional behavior, is with the same unconstitutional behavior.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I am not sure how even if the change wasn't still in favor of republicans, how this would "END TRUMP PRESIDENCY". Even if they flip senate too it's not like they can impeach and remove him

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Inshallah. I hope he delivers the permanent super majority.

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

    Let's say, for the sake of argument, California eliminates all Republican seats and Texas eliminates all Democratic seats... what would the new House look like?

    Texas -12D, +12R out of 38 total. (+1 vacancy)

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_representatives_from_Texas

    California -9R, +9D out of 52 total.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_representatives_from_California

    Net change? -3D, +3R.

    House composition goes from 219R / 212D / 4 Vacant to 222R / 209D / 4 Vacant.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representatives

    Newsom - Nice try, but no.

    Edit TIL - there are fewer Republican reps in California than there are Democratic reps in Texas!

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] 59 points 1 year ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago*

    Let’s say, for the sake of argument, California eliminates all Republican seats and Texas eliminates all Democratic seats…

    Texas will struggle to eliminate all Dem districts, simply because there are too many Dem voters. You're looking at a 1.5M spread of voters between R and D in Texas relative to a 3.2M spread in California.

    When a given district has roughly 600k people (of whom barely half reliably vote), it becomes incredibly difficult to crack the existing Dem population into subsets small enough to guarantee a 55/45 split for each Republican candidate. The only real alternative is to pack as many Dems into a single district as possible, in order to dilute the remainder. That's why the current Texas map only promises to flip 5 seats and leave 7 remaining.

    Even then, you're playing a dangerous game - a la 2006, 2008, 2012, and 2018 - in which a vibe shift costs you dozens of seats very quickly. The Republicans in 2008, for instance, lost every single House Seat in New England.

    California can easily gerrymander their Republican minority out of another five seats (maybe more with some clever math) because of the hard liberal swing the state has been on since the Bush Era.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    So... When are we going to stop pretending america is a democracy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Probably not before an obviously sham election happens or not being a registered Republican is functionally outlawed

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    This is stupid. Removing the voice of people is wrong no matter who does it. Fuck Newsom and Abbott.

    We need a new way to elect our representatives. The current method has clearly failed.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Removing the voice of people is wrong

    That's single-candidate districts for you. Put 40 Dems and 40 Republicans and 20 Swing Voters into a district and you're going to have a bare minimum of 40 unhappy voices.

    There are alternative methods for choosing elected representation. But they don't play well with a country as committed to segregation, disenfranchisement, and power consolidation as the modern Americanized democratic system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    So they just rollover and do nothing the? I don’t love it, but at some point we need to stop sitting around hoping we will play nice or do the right thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Anything other than changing how we select representatives is a shit sandwich. One choice just has less shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 27 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 66 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    We got line 2k troops in DC right now that could end Trump and the fascists. They just need to wake up and remember their oath to the constitution.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Sounds a lot like the plot of that film ‘civil war’

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    I feel like that film didn't really have a plot. Maybe I'm miss remembering.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Yeah, that movie sucked. The only almost good scene was the "What kind of American are you?" scene, which was entirely undermined by the fact that it ended with the guy choosing to kill the only genuine foreigners in the group instead of any of the Americans, regardless of what "kind" they were ??? Maybe I'm the one that completely missed the point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yeah, I remember being underwhelmed with the lack of a coherent plot.

    My armchair critique is; It didn't make any political prescriptions, or communicate any sincere analysis of real life shit. That's me being insufferable, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I think the only message I took away from it was some sort of commentary on war journalists and maybe by extension the people who watch their coverage for conflict voyeurism. The main lady called their purpose showing the world so they can make decisions, but you can tell that's not really sitting right in her head throughout the movie, and the other two are riding an adrenaline high like it's all just exciting.

    The only reason it would need to be set in America would be that if it was a war in Africa, we'd be even less inclined to see the detachment of the journalists as an issue to examine. There wasn't even all that much American on American action. The antagonists are either faceless or implied to be clinging to a lost cause on the wrong side.

    The most humanized antagonist... (spoiler).The most humanized antagonist might be the brief close up on the young female suicide bomber at the start of the movie.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    It did, but it wasn't what most people went in there for, so they didn't recognize it. It wasn't about one side or another, it was about the role of remaining neutral in a polarized situation. In the end, we still aren't sure if the president was Right or Left, but the media was clearly neutral.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    So yet more actions they could have taken before trump won but chose not to because ...

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago

    California has an indepenent committee that draws the maps. This action will require a statewide vote to temporarily override that committee's maps for this purpose. I don't think the vote would have succeeded before Trump won. Remains to be seen if the vote will succeed now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    California held out hope that America was a representative democracy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's amazing how many Americans seem to have wanted the Democrats to stage a coup to keep the Republicans from staging a coup.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Its not staging a coup, they could implement fair districting or ranked choice voting years ago but it would lead to people being able to support and run on policies that are more socialist then the democrats are allowed by their capitalist owners. See whats happening in NYC now due to ranked choice, that could be across the US but both parties are strongly against it.

    Both parties have this issue, its just that for the republicans they decided to embrace the far right instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Protecting their nation from falling into the hands of Traitors/ Criminals/Pedophiles/ Rapists/ Racists/ Morons isn't a "coup," it's obeying their paths of office to defend America "against all enemies, foreign and domestic." Those "domestic enemies?" That's MAGA.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago*

    MAGAs are so fucking stupid, it NEVER occurs to them that the Dems can wield these same weapons in return.

    The problem is, the Dems seldom do that. SCOTUS gave the president immunity superpowers, and we knew Trump would exploit the shit out of that, yet Biden didn't bother to take advantage of it, even though they knew that they were allowing an absolute proven Treasonous Criminal Pedophile Rapist to have another shot at the White House. He is literally America's biggest national security threat, and Biden should have treated as such, but he didn't. If he had, the MAGAs would have gone nuts, which would have been a good excuse to deal with them. That's how MAGAs think, Dems have to return it.

    Dems don't have to match the Treason and Corruption of the MAGAs to win, but they can play Hard Ball, which only forces everybody to play strictly by the rules, and includes the Dems playing by the exact same rules. If they can redistrict the only state that will make a difference for them, then the Dems can do the same thing in the 2 or 3 states that WILL make a difference for EVERYONE.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    TRUMP NEEDS TO HAVE HIS ORANGE FACE RUBBED IN THE SWAMP NEXT TO ALLIGATOR ALLEY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS ISSUE -WORLDS GREATEST COMMENTER-

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    My ass you will do! Revolution is the only solution, but the sheep's are sleeping long time now.
    Waiting for the next post of how you will overthrow Trump.

  • source
  • [+] -15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    IMO it is unwise to make such statements in this day and age... whisper them ok but don't shout it out.

    Same with wanting Obama to run a 3rd time if Trump does...
    The other day I saw a video titled "Bernie Sanders calls on students to rise up".

    Not a good thing to put those people in harms way by drawing attention from the wretched eyes.

    Don't get me wrong, I am not calling for silence, do protest, loudly, but it has to come from the people and don't single out targets for the oppressors to make easy examples of.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments