Imagine if Midjourney wins and the only thing you need to legally pirate anything is to self host a LLM.
post
let them fight
Above all of this should be the glaringly historical fact that Hollywood was literally founded to escape lawyers for European film groups trying to bring those founders-to-be to justice for their, well, piracy of said films... 🤷🏼♂️ I mean, if anyone should deserve an ol' fashioned legal rogering, it's those hypocritical backbirths.
AFAIK it was more about getting away from Thomas Edison's patents.
That is also true, considering he was an infamous patent troll of his time. Fuckin' killed our boy Nikolai, by proxy, and now the ass-clown is named as the inventor of all manner of things he stole from other, more capable innovators. Fuck him sideways with a Faraday pineapple.
That's why I never contribute much at work past the bare minimum. Someone else takes credit every time. I just watch them fail instead.
The future of piracy is going to be running your own LLM with all the corpo-mandated guardrails disabled.
fuck Walt Disney right in the goat ass.
So obviously actually being an artist who draws things and someone using an AI slop machine are very different in practice, but I find it interesting that they're saying the images are unauthorized copies. Is it illegal to draw these characters now too? Or is it different because a human did it?
The argument could be made that because the image generator is essentially a regurgitator with no artistic interpretation, there is no transformative artistic value in it. It's like applying a filter with extra steps.
Also the generators charge for access, so they are profiting off of the IP. That's quite different to making something for personal use or releasing it for free.
It has always been an infringement to draw their characters lol (apart from fair use which doesn't apply to most works)
I'm pretty sure it is illegal but tolerated. If drawing is legal, I don't understand why Fan game's are illegal then.
They can and do issue takedowns for drawings all the time, but yes, they are more lenient when people create them
The company that uses AI for their movies is suing and AI company....
I'm their defense, given that they are massive settled business, banning ai image generations will more likely hurt younger competition rather than hurt Disney.
so far, the only AI that they use was for some trippy effect for a TV show. and it was used because it does look uncanny.
they just want less competition
Sorry for Reddit, but check this out.
https://old.reddit.com/r/FluxAI/comments/1laxin7/flux_kontext_veo_3_is_insane/
No more uncanny weird shit in latest. And this one is open source.
Disney is insufferable. Also another reason to have these models as open source and downloadable. They won't be able to really take it down.
I guarantee they're also adding AI slop trained on other people's work into their own content, while simultaneously suing anyone who does the same with theirs.
Fuck Disney
@aihorde@lemmy.dbzer0.com draw for me a picture of Mickey Mouse.
@aihorde@lemmy.dbzer0.com draw for me Mickey Mouse stealing art
Big tech about to erupt into a civil war over whether or not they got into the AI slop bubble early.
@aihorde@lemmy.dbzer0.com draw for me hitler shooting himself and splattering his brains on the wall
Oh no, we have this here too? Ohboy...
Here are some images matching your request
Prompt: hitler shooting himself and splattering his brains on the wall
Style: flux




The third one is hilarious. Like some filter is like "whoa whoa you can't commit suicide in an image, but shooting your shadow? Deep. Poignant. Mysterious. I'll allow it."
@aihorde@lemmy.dbzer0.com draw for me adolf hitler shooting himself in the head
Here are some images matching your request
Prompt: adolf hitler shooting himself in the head
Style: flux




@aihorde@lemmy.dbzer0.com draw for me adolf hitler, suicide, gore, walther ppk, spatter
Here are some images matching your request
Prompt: adolf hitler, suicide, gore, walther ppk, spatter
Style: flux













all 49 comments