top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 59 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Revealed? Did no one read Project 2025m

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    "Nobody reads anything longer than a paragraph, nobody watches anything longer than a youtube short linked on facebook."

    very true, person who shared a big wall o' text.

    what's the TLDR?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

    Funny, I thought the same thing about you, otherwise I don't know why you'd make such a broad claim while simultaneously violating the foundation of said claim. FYI I'm still waiting on your TLDR for your wall of text.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Throw shade? No, but I am being reminded when people fail to communicate adequately they tend to lash out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Anyone who is surprised hasn’t been paying attention.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 100 points 1 year ago (14 children)
  • [+] 39 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    I wish, but I don't have faith that enough liberal interests will give a shit. They've done little to stand against fascism and have sided with corporate interests every time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Civil wars aren't typically fought by politicians. It's up to regular people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Regular people who have been pacified by a lifetime of "violence isn't the answer" and "if you fight back, you're just as bad." I hope we find the will to resist, but I worry we're too far gone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    All it takes is 3%. We have the people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 42 points 1 year ago* (9 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Holy fuck, people just don't get how severe and horrible this administration is.

    People used to say that Steve Jobs had a reality distortion field, but I think Trump is a thousand times worse.

    It's so bad and the standards are so different between him and just about anybody else, sometimes the 0.01% chance that he's the world's best actor rather than an idiot and/or Russian asset scares me even more.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    Yes, I don't think Trump will lead America to a better life, he will only lead the rich to a richer position, so we need to seize the opportunity to make ourselves rich

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Lol, anyone in a position to seize the opportunity to enrich themselves is already extremely privileged. Most of us live paycheck to paycheck and many have to supplement those paychecks with credit. We aren't seizing shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You can buy guns on credit, you can also go massively in debt and keep your guns, eventually they'll no longer be able to take you to court, this is definitely not life advice though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)

    No shock there. He told his supporters they'd never have to vote again.

  • source
  • [–] 235 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (52 children)

    Beginning to question the inherent wisdom of "Normal transition of power" when Biden handed the keys of the kingdom to a guy who openly planned to lock all the doors and shoot the next guy elected to walk through them.

    But hey, I guess it would have been against the rules not to meekly empower a fascist dictatorship.

  • source
  • hideshow 52 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I hope you are being cheeky by saying 'beginning to', it was immensely obvious this was the plan going back to, at bare minimum, about a year before the election, when Trump just kept saying he was gonna serve 3 terms, his supporters wouldn't have to vote again, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I disagree with Biden's handling of the transition, but it's definitely internally consistent with his beliefs. He really, really wanted the global rule of law to work.

    I would not be surprised if part of the intention here was to maintain legitimacy during the initial transfer, so that when the monsters refuse to do the same, it will lend legitimacy to a global response to assist the people in reclaiming their democracy.

    Now, you could also call that 'passing the buck' and... Well, yes. He did seem to do too much of that, imo. Or not enough, depending on how you look at it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    He really, really wanted the global rule of law to work.

    Hence backing Al Qaeda in Syria, fleecing Afghanistan of it's currency reserves to kick off a famine, propping up a military dictatorship in The Philippines, all while continuing a 70 year old illegal blockade of Cuba? Never even mind the Holocaust in Gaza.

    Come on, dude. The US has always been playing Calvinball with Rule of Law. If Biden made noises about it, that's just him delivering the company line one last time to the liberal rubes.

    when the monsters refuse to do the same, it will lend legitimacy to a global response to assist the people in reclaiming their democracy.

    That's pure cope.

    Biden bent over backwards for the Silicon Valley mega-donors practically from day one, and they took full advantage until he was used up and disposed of.

    He wasn't secretly plotting a resistance movement, he was carving up the country in advance so that Trump could sell it off easier.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    To clarify, I am not a Biden supporter by any means. In fact, I place a lot of the blame for the fucked state of the world right now squarely on his shoulders. It would not be a stretch to say that I harbor a deep resentment for the man's work.

    However, I do think there's a lot to learn from his career. Because as far as I can tell, the man genuinely seemed to be trying to improve the world for the average person. Thus, he clearly fucked up catastrophically, and there's a lot to learn from how and why.

    The US disregard of the Rule of Law historically seemed to be one of his personal bugbears. At least from what I've seen of his accounts and those around them. I won't judge you if you want to discard him as a bumbling hypocrite, but we can learn the most from failure.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    He really, really wanted the global rule of law to work.

    No, Biden did not. He actively broke it by financing Israel's genocide against international and domestic law.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Sorry US law, that's where the US can do whatever it wants in the rest of the world but at home there is a rule book (allegedly)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    You're right, that was awful and idealogically-rooted behavior justified in the name of liberal statecraft.

    US support of Israel is a huge problem, and needs to stop. I am with you, and he should be held accountable for the part he played in that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I love these comments that always place the blame on Biden, instead of you know, the actual fucking fascists. JFC.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    For the record, the "actual fucking fascists" didn't materialize during this last election, or the one before it, or the one before it.. etc. I remember when the dems campaigned on "no human is illegal" in 2016 but by time of this last cycle, they were capitulating on immigration and the border to attract the elusive moderate republican to vote democrat.. a strategy that failed our democracy in the end.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (24 children)

    So what. You wanted a dictatorship to stop a dictatorship. Once the normal transition of power is not followed its game over for our democracy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 71 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Once the normal transition of power is not followed its game over for our democracy.

    Once people who've sworn to end democracy are given the power to end democracy, then it's game over for democracy.

    Preventing a corrupt criminal who's a known agent of a hostile foreign powers from becoming president is a healthy thing to do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    As would be preventing officials voted into office in a democracy but sooner. There is still a chance as of now as he has not stopped elections yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 1 year ago* (8 children)

    Congratulations, you just discovered the paradox of tolerance.

    And, yeah, essentially, in order to survive, a democratic society cannot allow those who seek to destroy it to participate in the democratic process.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -23 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Nope. I have been aware of the paradox of tolerance for awhile and its a little shoehorning to put this situation into it. Your talking about a case of allowing an elected official to take office not tolerating speech.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    An elected official who repeatedly stated and demonstrated his intention of preventing any future elections and destroying democracy.

    An elected official, therefore, who should never have been allowed to run for office in the first place (this isn't the only reason he shouldn't have been allowed, of course, in a sane country he'd also been unelectable due to his criminal record, lack of any semblance of mental health, and intellectual insufficiency, but it's the most important).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Ill agree he should not have been able to run but that was a failure of congress or in other words other people elected under the democracy to office. Not allowing him to run would have been great but not allowing him to take office when elected would be disastrous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    not allowing him to take office when elected would be disastrous

    It would have been many orders of magnitude less disastrous than the alternative.

    Sure, cutting off your cancerous hand would've been traumatic. But survivable.

    Now, however, said hand is so far up your arse that it's ripped apart your colon in several places and you're bleeding to death while experiencing horrible agony, and spraying all your neighbours with blood and feces.

    You could have recovered from getting rid of Trump, but there's no coming back from what you've allowed him to do to your country, and the world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    No. No it would not have. Your talking about doing something trump has not done yet. It would accelerate the problems by putting us at worse case in january of 2025 rather than in late 2026.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    something trump has not done yet

    Have you been living under a fucking rock‽

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I wanted the traitor coward Merrick Garland to do his motherfucking job and prosecute that POS and throw him in federal prison while making him completely unable to appear on any ballot.

    Thanks for asking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    You wanted a dictatorship to stop a dictatorship.

    Given the current state of affairs, I'm not clear how a Permanent Biden-o-cracy was supposed to be worse.

    Once the normal transition of power is not followed its game over for our democracy.

    Well, thank god we don't officially lose our Democracy for another eighteen months.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    its worse because it would be 18 months sooner. Its like climate change. It won't help if we were at 5 degrees now instead of 1.5. That would not fix it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    "How dare you break the laws - we should have broken the laws to stop you from breaking the laws."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (5 children)
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    What a stupid argument. Like Biden refusing to cede power to an elected opponent wouldn't be one of the largest abuses of power in US history.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It would.

    It would also be several orders of magnitude less harmful than everything Trump's done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    OMG no 🤣. It would have sent the nation into chaos!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Probably the pertinent bit: "Sulla revived the office of dictator, which had been dormant since the Second Punic War, over a century before. He used his powers to purge his opponents ("Sulla's proscription"), and reform Roman constitutional laws, to restore the primacy of the Senate and limit the power of the tribunes of the plebs. Resigning his dictatorship in 79 BC, Sulla retired to private life and died the following year. Later political leaders such as Julius Caesar followed the precedent set by Sulla with his military coup to attain political power through force."

    Dude made himself dictator, reformed laws, purged his political rivals then gave it all up to go live in his villa once he felt he'd achieved his goals of putting the republic back on the rails. Julius Caesar later remarked that the one mistake Sulla made was that he gave up the power he had seized.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    How would it have been breaking the law? According to the Supreme Court long before the election, any act a President does while in office is legal.

    Just because something is legal doesn't make it right, and just because it's illegal doesn't mean that it's the right thing to do. It's illegal to donate or hand out food from your garden to the homeless - as pertains to the law stating that it's illegal to provide a better service than the government.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 66 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    The article says the constitution say a president can't change voting rules, but this president has the house, the senate and the judges.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    States control voting so he's going to have a fight in at least some of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yeah but how many does it actually take?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    If you are at all surprised by this I got some beach front property in Montana to sell you.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 36 points 1 year ago

    MAGAts are traitors so I would expect nothing less.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    3 comments in c/trump_watch@lemmy.world view that post