all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Half the comments on HN these days feel like tech-broligarch propaganda.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    All big companies have social media monitors to analyse posts about themselves, analyzing sentiment and then counter negative news with their vast trove of astroturfing bots. The social media is setup to be as opaque to the world as it can be, to be manipulated.

    There's always going to be someone outside or inside the company (considering how big some companies are) defending, then marketing moves them to the top. Deflect and divide opinions and shame naysayers.

    It's been going on since forever, now enhanced with AI.

  • source
  • parent
  • 21 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 24 points 1 year ago

    Every country should do this.

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    Welcome to xlsx vs ods hell

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Which is exactly what many have warned about for 20 years. The Microsoft lock-in is insane.
    It's better to get out sooner rather than later.
    But considering most of EU is planning similar transitions, I'd be surprised if they don't cooperate on making better import of MS formats in Libre Office.

    The Danish government is also planning to make guidelines to make a smooth transition easier. Which will be available for private companies too.

    Something that may make it easier is that it's been law for more than a decade, that ALL documents from public services must be made in open standards.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Shouldn't be too bad. It'll take a while, but you grab an example you have now in word, tweak it until it works in libreoffice and you're done. The biggest issue I've had was constant transitions between the two. If you just move to one it's a rough start moving, but once you're there you just edit as always. Word isn't even that great at keeping it's own formatting, so it won't be anything new except for learning a new program. it might get difficult once you get to links and embedding, I haven't tried that in libreoffice so I can't speak to whether it's harder or not.

    Beyond that, you should be pdf-ing any finalized documents anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Xlsx is actually an open standard, but only if you use strict mode, which Microsoft conveniently does not make the default option when saving. You have to choose it explicitly when saving.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_Open_XML

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    I know this phrase gets trouted out a lot (possibly to the point of being fatiguing to hear), especially when it comes to MS, but this is a textbook case of their Embrace, Extend, Extinguish mantra.

    Have an open standard (Embrace)... add a bunch of non-open components (Extend)... to fuck over compatibility with competitors and prevent them from gaining market share (Extinguish).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    That's what I meant. Microsoft created the Office Open XML format as an open standard, but they don't follow their own standard and make their "extended" version of the standard as the default.

    Other Office suites like Libre Office support this format via strict mode, which is not selected by default when you save these files using the Microsoft Office suite.

    Technically even Google does this with Chrome: Open standard JS but they also use custom components, sites that use these components break on other browsers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    More users will hopefully mean more people finding and reporting edge cases which will lead to better software. Open source is great because anyone can improve it and everyone has the changes if accepted by the developers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Good move! Yet at the same time they’re buying Palantir software for the police and turning DK into a surveillance state nightmare 🥲

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Anyone know what Linux distro? I assume Ubuntu...

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Most likely one of the commercial ones that offer support and contractual guarantees of security patches, uptime, service, helpdesk support, etc.

    So likely Ubuntu, SUSE, or RHEL.

    Any of which would be a very welcome change and a benefit to the Linux community compared to using Windows.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    I don't think so, because Ubuntu is also controlled by a private company, and Ubuntu has issues with open source, making everything they do dual license, meaning they can choose to switch away from open source to proprietary on everything developed within the Ubuntu framework.

    So choosing Ubuntu would be incredibly short sighted. Debian is a much stronger candidate. Or an in house distro based on Debian, until a common EU distro is ready, which is already planned.

  • source
  • parent
  • 19 comments in c/linux@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 46 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Again.

    Every few years we hear a nations gov say this. Them m$ makes a deal to good to be true. And it all resets.

    It's basically become an accounting trick for national govs.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    This time its politics and not economics. Its not because Microsoft is getting too expensive. Its because Denmark wants to break free from big tech and dependency or other (big) countries

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Microsoft will offer to build a big data warehouse there then.

    For m$ it is very much about not having a big gov org successfully moved over. As then corps may consider it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago*

    We already have more Datacenters than we should have considering the size of our country Including Microsoft.
    They like to settle here, because they can get cheap renewable energy, which they then use as part of their advertising propaganda to claim they are working for a greener environment, when in reality it's Denmark that has made the investments in the infrastructure for it since the 70's to make it possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I wonder how a corporate product deal would ever be cheaper than FOSS software. Bundled apps perhaps? And maybe central management? And maybe centralized or cloud-based storage and content management?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Tech support. Knowing you have available staff who understand how to fix issues. And will take responsibility

    These are always the questions that sell commercial software over os to big corporations.

    Anyone who has ever worked in a big corp recognises the arguments even if they disagree.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    wtf the cookies banner on that site is fucked

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Well it's the Danish ministry not the cookie ministry

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Is it known which distro they are using?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    A little while ago I met someone whose job is to worry about international affairs and they were worried about operating systems.

    After that I started worrying about every end user device in Ukraine shutting down until peace was negotiated.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Will the donut and muffin ministries follow suit?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 13 comments in c/technology@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    Article says they also switch to Linux, which is kind of an even bigger deal!

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago

    "We won't get any closer to the goal if we don't start."

    such a great line, yes, just take a step! Even if it's hard, you will learn something but if you don't try, you won't.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Good to see. LibreOffice is solid today. Was passable back in like 2012. Now it's pretty excellent, at least for most people. Ribbon interface like 5 years ago was pretty rough. Now I think it's pretty close to great. I thought OnlyOffice and WPS Office had a substantial visual edge but that was me comparing it to like 2020 LibreOffice. 2025 LibreOffice looks pretty good now that I wouldn't feel worries about newcomers looking at it as a relic of 2003 visual design

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Hopefully this also means monetary investment in open source, not just open source usage without a support contract or contributing back. Matrix is a great example of an open source project that is being used by governments but struggling to get paid because governments are employing their own support staff and making internal forks.

    But the more governments, agencies and individuals switch, there greater the chance they'll pay the developers and maintainers for support or features.

    Anti Commercial-AI license

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I wonder why they chose LibreOffice instead of Collabora?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    IIRC, Collabora is based off of LibreOffice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Yes it is… but it actually allows for collab features that LibreOffice doesn’t have.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Like what?

    If Collabora has extra features they do not think they need, relying on the lowest dependencies seems like the most reliable and fair choice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    LibreOffice is offline; each person can run the software in their own device to create and edit documents.

    It’s features are equivalent to 2010 Office. That’s not necessarily bad, but it’s not how people usually work today.

    Collabora lets you host documents on a central server and have multiple people edit at once, dynamically tracking changes and allowing full revision management. Or, you can keep your documents local and not host them if you don’t want to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Is it even legal?

    A popup saying that I need to pay to browse without tracking

  • source
  • 8 comments in c/buyeuropean@feddit.uk view that post
    [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    It kinda pisses me off that they used an ANSI keyboard for ths picture and not ISO. No true Scotsman Dane uses ANSI.

    EDIT: No true Scotsman either, come to think of it 🇪🇺⌨️

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Did they also replace the enter key with the Danish flag? Makes sense, they love Danish flags on everything m

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago
    2 comments in c/technology@lemmy.zip view that post
    [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    LibreOffice Calc can’t do everything Excel can do. But LibreOffice Calc + Pandas or R can! That is how I work.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Funny that a site giving me this message when trying to reject cookies writes about software freedom.

    "We offer you the option of rejecting individual data processing. If you have made a selection for all processing purposes, you can save it. Please note that consent to personalised advertising is always required for use without a Pur subscription."

    Trash website.

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/technologie@jlai.lu view that post